Haematologica EWOG-MDS website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SUBSCRIPTIONS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abildgaard, N
Right arrow Articles by Heickendorff, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abildgaard, N
Right arrow Articles by Heickendorff, L
Haematologica, Vol 89, Issue 5, 567-577
Copyright © 2004 by Ferrata Storti Foundation


Evaluation Studies

Sequential analysis of biochemical markers of bone resorption and bone densitometry in multiple myeloma

N Abildgaard, K Brixen, EF Eriksen, JE Kristensen, JL Nielsen, and L Heickendorff

Department of Haematology, Aarhus University Hospital, Amtssygehuset, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. niels.abild@dadlnet.dk

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Bone lesions often occur in multiple myeloma (MM), but no tests have proven useful in identifying patients with increased risk. Bone marker assays and bone densitometry are non-invasive methods that can be used repeatedly at low cost. This study was performed to evaluate these methods in predicting bone events in MM patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty newly diagnosed MM patients were enrolled. Serum C-terminal telopeptide (ICTP) and urinary N-terminal telopeptide (NTx) of collagen I were measured for assessment of bone resorption, and serum C-terminal (PICP) and N-terminal (PINP) propeptides of procollagen I, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and osteocalcin were measured to estimate bone formation. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) was used to assess bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine, hip, and whole body. Serum and urine samples were collected every 6 weeks, DEXA-scans performed every 3 months, and skeletal radiographs were done every 6 months as well as when indicated. RESULTS: Serum ICTP and urinary NTx were predictive of progressive bone events. Markers of bone formation, bone mineral density assessments, and M component measurements were less informative. In Cox analysis, ICTP showed the highest predictive value, but should be replaced with NTx in patients with nephropathy. Pretreatment low lumbar BMD was predictive of early vertebral fractures. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Sequential DEXA-scans showed heterogeneous local BMD changes, and our data do not support routine use of sequential DEXA-scans. However, lumbar DEXA-scans at diagnosis can identify patients with increased risk of early vertebral collapses. Sequential analyses of serum ICTP and urinary NTx are useful for monitoring bone damage.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
E. Terpos and M.-A. Dimopoulos
Myeloma bone disease: pathophysiology and management
Ann. Onc., August 1, 2005; 16(8): 1223 - 1231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SUBSCRIPTIONS
Copyright © 2004 by the Ferrata Storti Foundation.