Haematologica
HOME HELP FEEDBACK TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SUBSCRIPTIONS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mihou, D
Right arrow Articles by Zervas, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mihou, D
Right arrow Articles by Zervas, K
Haematologica, Vol 91, Issue 8, 1149-1150
Copyright © 2006 by Ferrata Storti Foundation

Comparative Study

Evaluation of five staging systems in 470 patients with multiple myeloma

D Mihou, I Katodritou, and K Zervas

We evaluated the prognostic significance of five staging systems in 470 consecutive, previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma diagnosed between 1989 and 2006. The five staging systems were those proposed by Durie and Salmon, Bataille et al., the South West Oncology Group, Weber et al. and the International Staging System. This last proved to be superior to the others.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SUBSCRIPTIONS
Copyright © 2006 by the Ferrata Storti Foundation.