Chronic Myeloid Leukemia |
From the III. Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany (MM, PP, KM, HK, US, RH, AH); Azienda Ospedaliera S. Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Italy (GS, EG); School of Clinical and Laboratory Sciences, University of Newcastle, UK (FL); II. Medizinische Klinik, Universität Frankfurt, Germany (HP, OGO); Dept. of Pathology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland OR, USA (RDP); Dept. of Clinical Pathology, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA (RRT); Roche Diagnostics, Penzberg, Germany (HS)
Correspondence: Martin C. Müller, III. Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Wiesbadener Str. 7-11, 68305 Mannheim, Germany. E-mail: mueller{at}uni-hd.de
Due to the lack of comparability of BCR-ABL mRNA quantification results generated by various methodologies in different laboratories, an international multicenter trial was started with the participation of six laboratories (platforms: LightCyclerTM, LC, n=3; TaqManTM, TM, n=3). One hundred and eighty-six PB samples derived from healthy donors were spiked with serial dilutions (1:20 to 1:2x106) of b2a2, b3a2 or e1a2 BCR-ABL positive white blood cells (WBC) from leukemic patients. After PAXgeneTM stabilization, blinding, freezing and distribution, standardized RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, PCR protocols and data evaluation were carried out. There was no significant difference in the results achieved using LC and TM technologies, but a considerable overall variation (CV=0.74 for ratios BCR-ABL/ABL). Up to a dilution of 1:1,000, 27/30 of the 2.5 mL samples tested positive. For higher dilutions, a PB volume of 5 or 10 ml was required to improve sensitivity. The study showed the feasibility of RQ-PCR standardization independent of the PCR machine used.
Key words: standardization, quantitative PCR, BCR-ABL, chronic myelogenous leukemia.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Rosti, F. Palandri, F. Castagnetti, M. Breccia, L. Levato, G. Gugliotta, A. Capucci, M. Cedrone, C. Fava, T. Intermesoli, et al. Nilotinib for the frontline treatment of Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia Blood, December 3, 2009; 114(24): 4933 - 4938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. Kim, L. Sriharsha, W. Xu, S. Kamel-Reid, X. Liu, K. Siminovitch, H. A. Messner, and J. H. Lipton Clinical Relevance of a Pharmacogenetic Approach Using Multiple Candidate Genes to Predict Response and Resistance to Imatinib Therapy in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2009; 15(14): 4750 - 4758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Baccarani, G. Rosti, F. Castagnetti, I. Haznedaroglu, K. Porkka, E. Abruzzese, G. Alimena, H. Ehrencrona, H. Hjorth-Hansen, V. Kairisto, et al. Comparison of imatinib 400 mg and 800 mg daily in the front-line treatment of high-risk, Philadelphia-positive chronic myeloid leukemia: a European LeukemiaNet Study Blood, May 7, 2009; 113(19): 4497 - 4504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Baccarani, F. Pane, and G. Saglio Monitoring treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia Haematologica, February 1, 2008; 93(2): 161 - 169. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||