Multiple Myeloma |
1Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group (HOVON), The Netherlands and 2German GMMG
Correspondence: H.M. Lokhorst, Dept. of Hematology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail: h.lokhorst{at}umcutrecht.nl
In the prospective phase 3 HOVON-50/GMMG-HD3 trial, patients randomized to TAD (thalidomide, doxorubicin, dexamethasone) had a significantly higher response rate (at least PR) after induction compared with patients randomized to VAD (vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone, 72% vs. 54%, p<0.001). Complete remission (CR) and very good partial remission (VGPR) were also higher after TAD. After High Dose melphalan 200mg/m2 response was comparable in both arms, 76% and 79% respectively. However, CR plus VGPR were significantly higher in the patients randomized to TAD (49% vs. 32%, p<0.001). CTC grade 3–4 adverse events were similar in both arms.
Key words: thalidomide, untreated multiple myeloma.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Ludwig, M. Beksac, J. Blade, M. Boccadoro, J. Cavenagh, M. Cavo, M. Dimopoulos, J. Drach, H. Einsele, T. Facon, et al. Current Multiple Myeloma Treatment Strategies with Novel Agents: A European Perspective Oncologist, January 1, 2010; 15(1): 6 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Stewart, P. G. Richardson, and J. F. San-Miguel How I treat multiple myeloma in younger patients Blood, December 24, 2009; 114(27): 5436 - 5443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-L. Harousseau, H. Avet-Loiseau, M. Attal, C. Charbonnel, F. Garban, C. Hulin, M. Michallet, T. Facon, L. Garderet, G. Marit, et al. Achievement of at Least Very Good Partial Response Is a Simple and Robust Prognostic Factor in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Treated With High-Dose Therapy: Long-Term Analysis of the IFM 99-02 and 99-04 Trials J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2009; 27(34): 5720 - 5726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Kumar, J. R. Mikhael, F. K. Buadi, D. Dingli, A. Dispenzieri, R. Fonseca, M. A. Gertz, P. R. Greipp, S. R. Hayman, R. A. Kyle, et al. Management of Newly Diagnosed Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma: updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) Consensus Guidelines Mayo Clin. Proc., December 1, 2009; 84(12): 1095 - 1110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-L. Harousseau, M. Attal, and H. Avet-Loiseau The role of complete response in multiple myeloma Blood, October 8, 2009; 114(15): 3139 - 3146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K Kettle, K. L Finkbiner, S. E Klenke, R. D Baker, D. W Henry, and C. B Williams Initial therapy in multiple myeloma: investigating the new treatment paradigm Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, September 1, 2009; 15(3): 131 - 141. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kumar, S. Giralt, E. A. Stadtmauer, J. L. Harousseau, A. Palumbo, W. Bensinger, R. L. Comenzo, S. Lentzsch, N. Munshi, R. Niesvizky, et al. Mobilization in myeloma revisited: IMWG consensus perspectives on stem cell collection following initial therapy with thalidomide-, lenalidomide-, or bortezomib-containing regimens Blood, August 27, 2009; 114(9): 1729 - 1735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. San-Miguel and M.-V. Mateos How to treat a newly diagnosed young patient with multiple myeloma Hematology, January 1, 2009; 2009(1): 555 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. San-Miguel, J.-L. Harousseau, D. Joshua, and K. C. Anderson Individualizing Treatment of Patients With Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 26(16): 2761 - 2766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-L. Harousseau Induction Therapy in Multiple Myeloma Hematology, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 306 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||