Haematologica, Vol 93, Issue 1, 98-103 doi:10.3324/haematol.11582
Copyright © 2008 by Ferrata Storti Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Ruggeri et al. Additional Tables
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruggeri, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rodeghiero, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruggeri, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rodeghiero, F.

Platelet Disorders

Heterogeneity of terminology and clinical definitions in adult idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a critical appraisal from a systematic review of the literature

Marco Ruggeri, Stefania Fortuna, Francesco Rodeghiero

Division of Hematology, S. Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy

Correspondence: Francesco Rodeghiero, M.D., Division of Hematology, S. Bortolo Hospital Vicenza, 36100 Italy. E-mail: rodeghiero{at}hemato.ven.it

Clinical definitions and terminology vary greatly in clinical studies on idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). An objective assessment of this heterogeneity may be of interest, providing a basis for standardizing ITP terminology. A systematic review of the recent literature on ITP in adults was carried out. The following items were extracted from the articles for comparison: platelet count cut-off values to decide treatment and type of response; timing for evaluating the response to treatment; evaluation of bleeding symptoms; criteria to define initial, chronic and refractory forms. A total of 79 papers, among those published or referenced from 2000 to 2006, were considered eligible. No consensus among the different authors was found on several issues, including:platelet count for definition of ITP; grading of severity; definition of chronic ITP; platelet threshold to start treatment; platelet count to define response to treatment and timing for evaluating the response to therapy. There was only major consensus for the length of disease duration required to diagnose chronic ITP, the criteria for splenectomy and the definition of refractory ITP. Confusing terminology and an unacceptable heterogeneity of clinical definitions used for management decisions and to describe outcomes were evident in recent ITP literature. This makes it very difficult to compare different studies and to share data and clinical experiences. A standardization of terminology and definitions used in ITP is urgently needed.

Key words: idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, ITP, systematic review, diagnosis, therapy, terminology.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BloodHome page
F. Rodeghiero, R. Stasi, T. Gernsheimer, M. Michel, D. Provan, D. M. Arnold, J. B. Bussel, D. B. Cines, B. H. Chong, N. Cooper, et al.
Standardization of terminology, definitions and outcome criteria in immune thrombocytopenic purpura of adults and children: report from an international working group
Blood, March 12, 2009; 113(11): 2386 - 2393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]