Disorders of Iron Metabolism |
1 Department of Clinical Chemistry, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
2 Pharmaceutical Sciences Division, Kings College London, London, UK
3 Department of Clinical Chemistry, Imperial College HealthCare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
4 Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Internal Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
5 Laboratory of Molecular Biology & Immunobiotechnology, Department of Biochemistry, Hellenic Pasteur Institute, Athens, Greece
6 Intrinsic Life Sciences, La Jolla, CA, USA
7 Division of Advanced Medicine, Medical Research Institute/Division of Nephrology, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan
8 CRUK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
9 Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, LA, USA
10 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Correspondence: Dorine W. Swinkels, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. E-Mail: D.Swinkels{at}akc.umcn.nl
The recently discovered iron regulatory peptide hormone hepcidin holds promise as a novel biomarker in iron metabolism disorders. To date, various mass spectrometry and immunochemical methods have been developed for its quantification in plasma and urine. Differences in methodology and analytical performance hinder the comparability of data. As a first step towards method harmonization, several hepcidin assays were compared. Worldwide eight laboratories participated in a urinary and plasma round robin in which hepcidin was analyzed. For both urine and plasma: (i) the absolute hepcidin concentrations differed widely between methods, (ii) the between-sample variation and the analytical variation of the methods are similar. Importantly, the analytical variation as percentage of the total variance is low for all methods, indicating their suitability to distinguish hepcidin levels of different samples. Spearman correlations between methods were generally high. The round robin results inform the scientific and medical community on the status and agreement of the current hepcidin methods. Ongoing initiatives should facilitate standardization by exchanging calibrators and representative samples.
Key words: hepcidin, iron, quality control.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Bergamaschi and L. Villani Serum hepcidin: a novel diagnostic tool in disorders of iron metabolism Haematologica, December 1, 2009; 94(12): 1631 - 1633. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||