Haematologica
HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SUBSCRIPTIONS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 2 September 2008
(Haematologica 2008, 10.3324/haematol.13285)
Copyright © 2008 by Ferrata Storti Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Moreau et al.- Supplementary Appendix
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moreau, P.
Right arrow Articles by Harousseau, J.-L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moreau, P.
Right arrow Articles by Harousseau, J.-L.

Brief Report

Prospective comparison of subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma

Philippe Moreau1, Valerie Coiteux2, Cyrille Hulin3, Xavier Leleu2, Helgi van de Velde4, Milin Acharya5, Jean-Luc Harousseau1

1 University Hospital, Nantes, France;
2 University Hospital, Lille, France;
3 University Hospital, Nancy, France;
4 Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium and
5 Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C., Raritan, NJ, USA

Correspondence: Philippe Moreau, MD, Department of Hematology, University Hospital, Hôtel-Dieu, Place Ricordeau, 44093, Nantes cedex 01, France. E-mail:philippe.moreau{at}chu-nantes.fr

ABSTRACT

This phase I study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00291538) compared pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and assessed safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) administration of bortezomib. Relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients were randomized to receive bortezomib by standard IV bolus (n=12) or SC injection (n=12) at the recommended dose and schedule (1.3 mg/m2, days 1, 4, 8, 11; eight 21-day cycles). Plasma bortezomib concentration and percent 20S proteasome inhibition were measured at multiple time points on days 1 and 11, cycle 1. Systemic bortezomib exposure was similar between arms. As expected, mean maximum plasma concentration was lower and took longer to reach following SC administration. Overall 20S proteasome inhibition was similar between arms. Safety profile and response rate for the SC arm did not appear inferior to the IV arm, with good local tolerance of SC injection. Based on these exploratory findings, SC administration offers an alternative option to IV injection.

Key words: multiple myeloma, bortezomib, subcutaneous administration.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SUBSCRIPTIONS
Copyright © 2008 by the Ferrata Storti Foundation.