Disorders of Hemostasis |
From Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6, UMR S 872, Paris, France (SD, SD, SA, A-MN, SVK, JB, SL-D); Université Paris Descartes, UMR S 872, Paris, France (SD, SD, SA, A-MN, SVK, JB, SL-D; INSERM, U872, Paris, France (SD, SD, SA, A-MN, SVK, JB, SL-D, LFB, Les Ulis, France (M-HA, SC, ZT)
Correspondence: Sébastien Lacroix-Desmazes, INSERM UMRS 681, Centre de recherche des Cordeliers, 15, rue de lEcole de Médecine, 75006, Paris, France. E-mail: sebastien.lacroix-des-mazes{at}umrs681.jussieu.fr
|
|
|---|
Key words: factor VIII, FVIII inhibitors, von Willebrand factor, animal model, hemophilia A.
Hemophilia A is a rare genetic hemorrhagic disorder that affects 1 in 5,000–10,000 males. It results from the absence of endogenous pro-coagulant factor VIII (FVIII).1 The management of bleeding episodes involves the intravenous administration of therapeutic FVIII to restore normal hemostasis. Sources of therapeutic FVIII are either pools of plasma from healthy donors or recombinant molecules produced by genetic engineering. In up to 35% of cases, the administration of exogenous FVIII to patients with hemophilia A leads to the development of anti-FVIII alloantibodies that inhibit the pro-coagulant activity of FVIII.2 The occurrence of anti-FVIII antibodies, therefore, prevents further use of FVIII and is a major therapeutic challenge. Several risk factors associated with the development of FVIII inhibitors have been identified.3,4 In particular, VWF has been proposed as a key chaperon molecule in reducing the immunogenicity of therapeutic FVIII in patients with hemophilia A. There is some evidence to suggest that the incidence of inhibitor development is lower when patients are treated with VWF-containing plasma-derived FVIII (pdFVIII) than when recombinant products without VWF are used.5 In fact, studies in a murine model of hemophilia A have indicated that the immunogenicity of FVIII is reduced in the presence of VWF.6
We used the well-established model of FVIII-deficient mice to compare the immunogenicity of therapeutic preparations of pdFVIII and recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) that were commercially available in France at the time of the study.
|
|
|---|
Mice
Mice were 7–10 week-old inbred 129/- (H-2Db background) exon 16 FVIII-deficient males and females (a gift from Prof Kazazian, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia). Animals were handled in agreement with local ethical authorities (Comité régional déthique p3/2005/002). Mice were treated by retro-orbital intravenous injection of 5 IU/ml FVIII in PBS at day 0, 14, 21 and 28. Blood was drawn by retro-orbital bleeding 5 days after the administration of FVIII. De-complemented plasma was kept at –20°C until use. Groups of 5–8 mice were used in each set of experiments.
Titration of anti-FVIII and anti-VWF IgG
ELISA plates (Nunc) were coated with rFVIII (2 µg/mL, Recombinate®) or with VWF (2 µg/mL, Wilfactin®) overnight at 4°C, and blocked with PBS-1% BSA. Serum dilutions were then incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Bound IgG was revealed using a HRP-coupled monoclonal anti-mouse IgG and substrate. The mouse monoclonal anti-FVIII IgG mAb6 (a gift from Prof. J.M. Saint-Remy, KUL, Belgium) and anti-VWF IgG Ac418 (a gift from Dr. J.P. Girma, INSERM U777, Bicêtre, France) were used as standards. Results are shown as optical densities in arbitrary units.
Titration of FVIII inhibitors
Decomplemented plasma was incubated with a standard human plasma (Dade-Behring) for 2 hrs. at 37°C. The residual pro-coagulant FVIII activity was measured using a chromogenic assay following the manufacturers recommendations (Dade-Behring). Bethesda titers, expressed in Bethesda units (BU)/mL, were calculated as described.7 Bethesda titers are defined as the reciprocal of the dilution of plasma that produces 50% residual FVIII activity.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Figure 1. Anti-FVIII IgG in FVIII-deficient mice. FVIII-deficient mice were treated by intravenous administration of 1 IU human FVIII for therapeutic use. The FVIII preparations used were Helixate® (HEL), Advate® (ADV), Refacto® (REF), Factane® (FAC). Control mice were treated with PBS. After 4 administrations, mice were bled and the presence of anti-FVIII IgG in the serum was investigated by ELISA (panel A) or by chromogenic assay (panel B). Anti-FVIII IgG titers, defined as the inverse of the serum dilution yielding 50% of binding to FVIII, are shown on panel A for each mouse in arbitrary units (open circles). FVIII inhibitory titers, expressed as BU/ml (7), are shown on panel B (each mouse as an open circle). Means within groups of mice are shown as thick horizontal lines. The significance of the differences was assessed using the Mann-Whitney non-parametric test. Inset: raw data depicting the mean anti-FVIII IgG titers expressed for each group of mice in optical density (HEL: open squares, 6 mice; ADV: closed squares, 7 mice; REF: open triangles, 7 mice; FAC: open circles, 7 mice; PBS: closed circles, 6 mice). Data are from 1 of 2 independent experiments.
|
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Figure 2. Titers of anti-VWF IgG in FVIII-deficient mice. FVIII-deficient mice were treated by intravenous administration of 1 IU human FVIII for therapeutic use, as explained in Figure 1. The FVIII preparations used were HEL (open squares, 8 mice), ADV (closed squares, 7 mice), REF (open triangles, 8 mice), FAC (open circles, 8 mice). Control mice were treated with PBS (closed circles, 5 mice). After 4 administrations, mice were bled. The presence of anti-VWF IgG was investigated in the plasma by ELISA. The data depict the IgG titers in arbitrary units (mean ± SD).
|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Figure 3. Protective effect of VWF. FVIII-deficient mice were treated by intravenous administration of 1 IU human FVIII. FVIII was injected alone (ADV: closed squares, 6 mice; FAC: open circles, 7 mice) or following 30 mins. pre-incubation in the presence of 0.2 IU pdVWF (ADV+WIL: open squares, 5 mice) at room temperature. Control mice received VWF alone (WIL: closed circles, 4 mice). After 4 administrations, mice were bled. The presence of anti-FVIII IgG was investigated in the plasma by ELISA. The data depict the IgG titers in arbitrary units (mean ± SEM). Differences were assessed using an ANOVA and the Fishers PLSD post-hoc test ( : p<0.01; *:p<0.0001).
|
Three different therapeutic preparations were used to provide rFVIII: Helixate®, a full length FVIII molecule produced in baby hamster kidney (BHK) cell line; Advate®, a full length FVIII produced in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line; and Refacto®, a rFVIII, the B domain of which has been eliminated, produced in the CHO cell line. The three preparations of rFVIII induced similar levels of anti-FVIII IgG suggesting that the presence or absence of the B domain is not critical for the immunogenicity of FVIII in FVIII-deficient mice. Factane® was used as a source of pdFVIII. The administration of Factane® induced titers of anti-FVIII IgG that were 3.8–6.5- fold lower than that induced by the three rFVIII preparations. Therefore, the administration of pdFVIII induced lower titers of inhibitors than that of rFVIII.
A role for VWF in reducing FVIII immunogenicity has been previously suggested. The pre-incubation of rFVIII with VWF at molar ratios identical to that found in Factane® resulted in a significant decrease in the titers of anti-FVIII IgG induced by the intravenous administration of FVIII. This observation reflects previous findings in FVIII-deficient mice.6 The VWF used in our studies is a plasma-derived preparation that contains trace amounts of FVIII (0.05% on a mole-to-mole basis). Interestingly, the administration of pdVWF alone induced detectable levels of anti-FVIII IgG, indicating that a molar excess of VWF does not completely suppress FVIII immunogenicity. In vitro experiments have recently suggested that, unlike plasma-derived products, rFVIII concentrates derived from both CHO and BHK cell lines contain a fraction of FVIII:Ag molecules (approximately 20%) which is unable to associate with VWF.9 Our results demonstrate that the in vitro pre-incubation of rFVIII with VWF reduced its immunogenicity to the level achieved with pdFVIII. These data suggest that the immunogenicity of rFVIII is not due exclusively to the reduced ability of rFVIII to bind to VWF, but that other mechanisms must be implicated. Molecular mechanisms that account for the protective effect of VWF on FVIII immunogenicity must still, therefore, be defined.
We have recently demonstrated that VWF protects in a dose-dependent manner FVIII from being endocytosed by human dendritic cells in vitro, thus reducing its presentation to cellular effectors of the immune system.10 Whether similar mechanisms are pertinent in vivo remains to be confirmed. In contrast to previously published work,5 a recent clinical study has reported that VWF-containing pdFVIII does not give a lower risk of developing inhibitory antibodies than rFVIII.11 This discrepancy may be due to the heterogeneity of the different pdFVIII products used to treat the patients included in the study in relation to their VWF content. Indeed, the molar ratio of VWF to FVIII in the different plasma-derived FVIII preparations ranges from 0 in the case of Monoclate® or Hemophil-M® to 174:1 in the case of Haemate-P® (according to the manufacturers communication).
Altogether, our data confirm that pdFVIII induces lower levels of anti-FVIII IgG than rFVIII, and confirm VWF as a key molecule in reducing the immunogenicity of therapeutic FVIII. The role of alternative immunomodulatory molecules such as transforming growth factor-beta 1 in reducing FVIII immunogenicity should, however, be considered.12–14 As randomized clinical trials are difficult to implement in PUPs with hemophilia A, these results from comparative animal studies become particularly relevant.
SuD and A-MN are recipients of fellowships from Fondation pour le Recherche Médicale (FRM) and from Conseil Régional dIle-de-France (Paris, France) respectively.
SaD, SA, SuD, SC, ZT, SLD; performing the experiments : SaD, SuD, ANM, SVK, JB, SLD; analysis and interpretation of data : SaD, SA, ANM, SVK, JB, SLD; drafting the article: SuD, MHA, SVK, SLD; critical revision for important intellectual content : SA, MHA, SC, ZT; final approval of the version to be published: SaD, SA, SuD, ANM, SVK, MHA, SC, ZT, SL.
The authors reported no potential conflicts of interest.
Funding: this work was supported by Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, by Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, by Université Pierre et Marie Curie, by a grant from Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR–05–MRAR–030).
Received for publication February 26, 2007. Accepted for publication May 22, 2007.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Dasgupta, J. Bayry, S. Andre, J. D. Dimitrov, S. V. Kaveri, and S. Lacroix-Desmazes Auditing Protein Therapeutics Management by Professional APCs: Toward Prevention of Immune Responses against Therapeutic Proteins J. Immunol., August 1, 2008; 181(3): 1609 - 1615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||