Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
1 Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School of Ribeirao Preto, Brazil;
2 Molecular Biology Laboratory, HEMOPE, Brazil;
3 Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Hospital Amaral Carvalho, Brazil
4 Hematology Service, University of Minas Gerais, Brazil;
5 Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, HCPA, Brazil;
6 Hematology Service, Santa Casa de São Paulo, Brazil;
7 Fundação Pio XII de Barretos, Brazil;
8 Hematology Service; HCPR, Brazil;
9 Clínica de Hematologia de Ribeirão Preto, Brazil;
10 Department of Hematology and Hemotherapy, UNIFESP, Brazil;
11 Oncominas, Brazil;
12 Hemocentro, State University of Campinas, Brazil;
13 International Outreach Program, St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
Correspondence: Eduardo Magalhães Rego, Laboratório de Hematologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Bandeirantes 3900, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14048900, Brazil. Phone: international +55.16.36022888. Fax: international +55.16.36336695. E-mail: emrego{at}hcrp.fmrp.usp.br
|
|
|---|
Key words: acute promyelocytic leukemia, ATRA, developing countries, Brazil.
There is sufficient evidence in literature to support the belief that all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and concomitant anthracycline-based chemotherapy should be the treatment of choice for newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL).1,2 In Brazil, APL accounts for more than 20% of acute myelogenous leukemias (AMLs),3 a higher incidence than that reported in developed countries. Nevertheless, despite the fact that anthracyclines and ATRA are widely available, the results with standard treatment are not known.
We retrospectively analyzed medical chart data of 157 APL patients treated from January 2003 to March 2006 at 12 Brazilian institutions. The diagnosis was based on detection of the t(15;17) chromosomal translocation by cytogenetic analysis or of PML/RAR
rearrangement by RT-PCR analysis. Laboratory diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) was based on changes in activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, fibrinogen degradation products (FDPs), and/or D-dimers. Central nervous system, pulmonary, or gastrointestinal hemorrhages were considered a severe bleeding. Patients were classified according to the risk of relapse on the basis of WBC and platelet counts (PLT) at diagnosis: low risk, WBC
10x109/L and PLT > 40x109/L; intermediate risk, WBC
10x109/L and PLT
40x109/L; and high risk, WBC > 10x109/L.4
Survival analysis was carried out for 134 patients who received anthracyclines (daunorubicin or idarubicin) plus ATRA in induction, ATRA and anthracyclines (daunorubicin, idarubicin, mitoxantrone or pharmarubicin) with or without citarabine in consolidation, and long term low dose chemotherapy in maintenance as proposed by Fenaux et al.5 Blood bank support was available in all the centers, however, not all of them adopted prophylactic transfusions based on fibrinogen concentrations. Early mortality was defined as death within 14 days of diagnosis. Survival rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared using the log-rank test. Differences among the risk groups regarding frequencies of bleeding and DIC at diagnosis, and mortality rates were compared using the
2 test. APL patients represented 28.2% of AML cases in the analyzed population. This is consistent with the previously reported higher frequency in patients with Latino ancestry.6,7 The median WBC counts (Table 1) was higher than those reported in literature.4,5 Consequently, the frequency of high-risk patients was significantly higher than that reported by PETHEMA and GIMEMA4 (36.9 vs 22.6%, p=0.009). Although the time taken to reach specialized care was not accessed, studies on other hematological malignances suggest that this factor may be associated with the frequency of high tumor burden. The incidence of severe bleeding did not differ from that previously reported8 but was associated with high mortality. DIC, severe bleeding and early mortality were more frequent in the high-risk group (p=0.015, p=0.001 and p<0.001 respectively) (Table 1). PML-RAR
isoform distribution did not differ from that described in nonlatino populations.9 This is in contrast to the reported excess of the BCR1 subtype in Mexican Mestizos.10
|
View this table: [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Table 1. Clinical and laboratory features and causes of mortality.
|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Figure 1. Overall survival of APL patients treated with ATRA in combination with anthracyclines in Brazil. A. Analysis of all patients. B. Analysis excluding patients who died during induction.
|
|
|
|---|
fusion gene. Br J Haematol 2003;122:563-70.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
fusion gene in Mexican Mestizo patients with promyelocytic leukemia are different from those in Caucasians. Leuk Lymphoma 2004;45:1365-8.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. S. Tallman and J. K. Altman How I treat acute promyelocytic leukemia Blood, December 10, 2009; 114(25): 5126 - 5135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||