Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
* Institute of Human Genetics, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
° Dept. of Hematology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Correspondence: David Rowe, Institute of Human Genetics, Central Parkway, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 3BZ United Kingdom. Phone: international +44.191.2418793. Fax: international +44.191.2418713. E-mail: david.rowe{at}ncl.ac.uk
|
|
|---|
Key words: leukemia, inv(16), MYH11, variant.
The pericentric inversion of chromosome 16 (inv(16)(p13q22)) and the related t(16;16)(p13;q22) are among the most common rearrangements in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). They are closely associated with AML type M4 with abnormal bone marrow eosinophils and a favourable clinical course.1
The inversion generates an in-frame chimeric fusion gene formed from 5' sequence from the core binding factor ß gene (CBFß) at 16q22 with 3' sequence from the myosin heavy chain gene (MYH11) at 16p132. Literature describes 10 possible CBFß-MYH11 transcripts (types A to J). Eight are in-frame and involve 2 CBFß breakpoints (at nt 495 or 399) and 8 MYH11 breakpoints (at nt 1921, 1528, 1201, 994, 1098, 1591, 2143 or 1306).3,4 Type A is the most frequent, being found in > 80% of cases and Types D and E in approximately 5%. Other transcript variants are rare.5
We describe a new CBFß-MYH11 transcript involving a novel MYH11 breakpoint within exon 32 (previously numbered exon 113) in a case of AML.
A 49-year old female presented with a 10 day history of purpura and a 24 hour history of gum bleeding. The full blood count revealed hemoglobin of 9.7g/dL, a white cell count of 50x109/ L, neutrophil count of 1x109 and a platelet count of 7x1012/L. Peripheral blood showed an excess of blasts and eosinophils. The bone marrow aspirate was grossly hypercellular with normal hematopoiesis replaced by a population of blasts, accounting for 47% of nucleated cells and eosinophils, and their precursors, accounting for 44% of nucleated cells. No Auer rods were seen although some blasts contained fine granules. Cytochemically, the blasts were positive for Sudan black and chloracetate esterase and 25% of nucleated marrow cells showed weak staining with non-specific esterase. Immunophenotyping showed positivity for myeloperoxidase, CD33, CD34, HLA-DR, CD117, CD13, CD64 and CD15, and B and T cell markers were negative. In addition, reticulin staining was diffusely increased at grade 3. Given this, a diagnosis of AMMLeo was made.
The patient was randomized on the MRC AML 15 trial to receive induction therapy with daunorubicin and ara-C (3+10). The neutrophil count recovered 15 days after finishing the first course of chemotherapy and the patient is currently in complete morphologic and genetic remission. Cytogenetic analysis of diagnostic bone marrow revealed a typical inv(16)(p13q22) as the sole abnormality and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) using a CBFß break-apart probe (Vysis, UK) showed a signal pattern consistent with a CBFß rearrangement with deletion of 3' sequence. This has been reported in some inv(16) cases with no apparent clinical impact.6,7 CBFß-MYH11 fusion transcript was confirmed by an established qualitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method.8 This generated an unexpected 550 bp product inconsistent with any of the recognised MYH11 or CBFß breakpoint variants. Direct sequencing showed a homogeneous product made up of an in-frame fusion transcript with a novel MYH11 breakpoint within exon 32 at nt 1795 (www.ensembl.org accession # OTTHUMT00000155641) plus the insertion of a TTTAATT sequence at the fusion point (Figure 1), with the typical CBFß breakpoint at nt 495. The homogeneous nature of the PCR product strongly suggested a genomic breakpoint variant rather than an alternatively spliced product.
|
View larger version (4K): [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Figure 1. Sequence of the novel CBFß-MYH11 transcript breakpoint region showing the insertion of additional bases at the fusion junction (in bold).
|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Figure 2. Genomic sequence of MYH11 exon 32 with putative heptamer and nonamer sites underlined. The corresponding sequences from the IgH locus (in italics) are aligned to them, with homologous bases in bold. The genomic breakpoint is indicated by an arrow.
|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||