Haematologica, Vol 92, Issue 10, 1433-1434 doi:10.3324/haematol.11536
Copyright © 2007 by Ferrata Storti Foundation
A case of acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16)(p13q22) reveals a novel MYH11 breakpoint and a new CBFß-MYH11 transcript variant
David Rowe*,,
Lisa Strain*,
Chris Lowe*,
Gail Jones°
* Institute of Human Genetics, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
° Dept. of Hematology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Correspondence: David Rowe, Institute of Human Genetics, Central Parkway, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 3BZ United Kingdom. Phone: international +44.191.2418793. Fax: international +44.191.2418713. E-mail: david.rowe{at}ncl.ac.uk
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
We present a case of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with a cytogenetically typical inv(16)(p13q22), M4 morphology and eosinophilia. However, studies revealed a CBFß-MYH11 fusion transcript which did not correspond to any of the 10 known variants. Subsequent sequencing revealed a new in-frame transcript variant resulting from a novel MYH11 exon 32 breakpoint and a seven base insertion at the fusion point. The patient remains in complete remission following standard protocols. Prognostic implications cannot, therefore, be evaluated.
Key words: leukemia, inv(16), MYH11, variant.
The pericentric inversion of chromosome 16 (inv(16)(p13q22)) and the related t(16;16)(p13;q22) are among the most common rearrangements in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). They are closely associated with AML type M4 with abnormal bone marrow eosinophils and a favourable clinical course.1
The inversion generates an in-frame chimeric fusion gene formed from 5' sequence from the core binding factor ß gene (CBFß) at 16q22 with 3' sequence from the myosin heavy chain gene (MYH11) at 16p132. Literature describes 10 possible CBFß-MYH11 transcripts (types A to J). Eight are in-frame and involve 2 CBFß breakpoints (at nt 495 or 399) and 8 MYH11 breakpoints (at nt 1921, 1528, 1201, 994, 1098, 1591, 2143 or 1306).3,4 Type A is the most frequent, being found in > 80% of cases and Types D and E in approximately 5%. Other transcript variants are rare.5
We describe a new CBFß-MYH11 transcript involving a novel MYH11 breakpoint within exon 32 (previously numbered exon 113) in a case of AML.
A 49-year old female presented with a 10 day history of purpura and a 24 hour history of gum bleeding. The full blood count revealed hemoglobin of 9.7g/dL, a white cell count of 50x109/ L, neutrophil count of 1x109 and a platelet count of 7x1012/L. Peripheral blood showed an excess of blasts and eosinophils. The bone marrow aspirate was grossly hypercellular with normal hematopoiesis replaced by a population of blasts, accounting for 47% of nucleated cells and eosinophils, and their precursors, accounting for 44% of nucleated cells. No Auer rods were seen although some blasts contained fine granules. Cytochemically, the blasts were positive for Sudan black and chloracetate esterase and 25% of nucleated marrow cells showed weak staining with non-specific esterase. Immunophenotyping showed positivity for myeloperoxidase, CD33, CD34, HLA-DR, CD117, CD13, CD64 and CD15, and B and T cell markers were negative. In addition, reticulin staining was diffusely increased at grade 3. Given this, a diagnosis of AMMLeo was made.
The patient was randomized on the MRC AML 15 trial to receive induction therapy with daunorubicin and ara-C (3+10). The neutrophil count recovered 15 days after finishing the first course of chemotherapy and the patient is currently in complete morphologic and genetic remission. Cytogenetic analysis of diagnostic bone marrow revealed a typical inv(16)(p13q22) as the sole abnormality and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) using a CBFß break-apart probe (Vysis, UK) showed a signal pattern consistent with a CBFß rearrangement with deletion of 3' sequence. This has been reported in some inv(16) cases with no apparent clinical impact.6,7 CBFß-MYH11 fusion transcript was confirmed by an established qualitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method.8 This generated an unexpected 550 bp product inconsistent with any of the recognised MYH11 or CBFß breakpoint variants. Direct sequencing showed a homogeneous product made up of an in-frame fusion transcript with a novel MYH11 breakpoint within exon 32 at nt 1795 (www.ensembl.org accession # OTTHUMT00000155641) plus the insertion of a TTTAATT sequence at the fusion point (Figure 1), with the typical CBFß breakpoint at nt 495. The homogeneous nature of the PCR product strongly suggested a genomic breakpoint variant rather than an alternatively spliced product.
Van Reijden et al.9 reported the insertion of short, apparently random sequences at the genomic fusion points in 2 out of 24 cases9 together with possible immunoglobulin heavy chain locus (IgH) V(D)J recombinase recognition sites adjacent to many of the genomic MYH11 breakpoints. Their conclusion was that V(D)J recombinase-mediated recombination may be responsible for some CBFß-MYH11 rearrangements. As we also found an inserted junctional sequence, the published germline MYH11 exon 32 sequence was examined and revealed both heptamer and nonamer upstream sequences with >70% homology to known sequences from the human IgH locus10 (Figure 2). Furthermore, they were separated by a 23 bp interval in keeping with the organisation of V(D)J rearrangement events.10 It should be underlined that the evidence is interesting but largely conjectural and further studies would be needed to fully clarify any mechanism.
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 2. Genomic sequence of MYH11 exon 32 with putative heptamer and nonamer sites underlined. The corresponding sequences from the IgH locus (in italics) are aligned to them, with homologous bases in bold. The genomic breakpoint is indicated by an arrow.
|
|
Although the case we describe expressed a new variant CBFß-MYH11 transcript, the patient presented with a typical AML M4eo clinical picture and a typical inv(16) as a sole abnormality. Response to therapy was good and the patient entered and remains in full clinical and cytogenetic remission. The study by Schnittger et al.10 suggested that rare variant CBFß-MYH11 cases may be biologically distinct from typical inv(16) AML but this appears not to be the case. Longer follow-up will be needed before we can draw any conclusions on the impact of this particular transcript variant.
|
References
|
|---|
- Larson RA, William SF, Le Beau MM. Acute myelomonocytic leukemia with abnormal eosinophils and inv(16) and t(16;16) has a favorable prognosis. Blood 1986;68:1242-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Liu P, Tarle SA, Hajra A, Claxton DF, Marlton P, Freedman M, et al. Fusion between transcription factor CBFß/PEPB2ß and a myosin heavy chain in acute myeloid leukaemia. Science 1993;261:1041-4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Van Dongen JJM, Macintyre EA, Gabert JA, Dealabesse E, Rossi V, Saglio G, et al. Standardized RT-PCR analysis of fusion gene transcripts from chromosome aberrations in acute leukemia for detection of minimal residual disease. Leukemia 1999;13:1901-28.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Grardel N, Roumier C, Soenen V, Lai JL, Plantier I, Gheveart C, et al. Acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) with inv(16)(p13q22) and the rare I type CBFß-MYH11 transcript: report of two new cases. Leukemia 2002;16:150-6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Schnittger S, Bacher U, Haferlach C, Kern W, Haferlach T. Rare CBFB-MYH11 fusion transcripts in AML with inv(16)/t(16;16) are associated with therapy-related AML M4eo, atypical cytomorphology, atypical immunophenotype, atypical additional chromosome rearrangements and low white blood cell count: a study of 162 patients. Leukemia 2007;21:725-31.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Batanian JR, Huang Y, Fallon R. Deletion of 3'-CBFB gene in association with an inversion (16)(p13q22) and a loss of the Y chromosome in a 2-year-old child with acute myelogenous leukemia-M4. Cancer Gene Cytogenet 2000;121:216-9.[CrossRef]
- Bacher U, Schnittger S, Kern W, Hiddeman W, Haferlach T, Schoch C. The incidence of submicroscopic deletions in reciprocal translocations is similar in acute myeloid leukemia, BCR-ABL positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and chronic myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 2005;90:558-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Shurtleff SA, Meyers S, Hiebert SW, Raimondi SC, Head DR, Willman CL, et al. Heterogeneity in CBFß/MYH11 fusion messages encoded by the inv(16)(p13q22) and the t(16;16)(p13;q22) in acute myelogenous leukemia. Blood 1995;12:3695-703.
- Van Reijden BA, Dauwerse HG, Giles RH, Jagmohan-Changur S, Wijmenga C, Liu PP, et al. Genomic acute leukemia-associated inv(16)(p13q22) breakpoints are tightly clustered. Oncogene 1999;18:543-50.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Gellert M. V(D)J recombination gets a break. Trends Genet 1992;8:408-12.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
TOP
ABSTRACT
References
