HOME HELP FEEDBACK TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SUBSCRIPTIONS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Biagi, E. Articles by Biondi, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Biagi, E. Articles by Biondi, A.

Chimeric T-cell receptors: new challenges for targeted immunotherapy in hematologic malignancies

"Centro di Ricerca Matilde Tettamanti", Department of Paediatrics, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Milan, Italy.

Correspondence: Ettore Biagi, Centro di Ricerca "M. Tettamanti", Clinica Pediatrica Università Milano-Bicocca, Via Pergolesi 33, 20052 Monza. E-mail: ettore.biagi{at}pediatriamonza.it

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT Use of CHTCR-expressing T... Applications of ChTCR in... Limitations and advances in... Concluding remarks: new... References

 
Chimeric T-cell receptors (ChTCR) are a fascinating technological step in the field of immunotherapy for orienting the activity of immune cells towards specific molecular targets expressed on the cell surface of various tumors, including hematologic malignancies. The main characteristics of ChTCR are their ability to redirect T-cell specificity and their killing/effector activity toward a selected target in a non-MHC-restricted manner, exploiting the antigen binding properties of monoclonal antibodies. ChTCR are, in fact, artificial T-cell receptors constituted by an antigen-recognizing antibody molecule linked to a T-cell triggering domain. Various hematologic malignancies represent optimal targets for the exploitation of ChTCR, because of the bright expression of specific antigens on the surface of tumor cells. Thus, CD19 and CD20 have been targeted for B-cell lymphoid tumors (acute lymphoblastic leukemia-ALL, lymphomas and chronic lymphocytic leukemia-CLL), CD33 for myeloid leukemia, and CD30 for lymphomas. Even though technical and safety progresses are still needed to improve the profile of gene transfer and protein expression of ChTCR, phase 1 trials will be carried out in the near future to demonstrate the feasibility of their clinical translation and, it is be hoped, give preliminary indications about their anti-tumor efficacy.

Key words: chimeric T-cell receptor, immunotherapy, hematologic malignancy.

Even though tumor immunotherapy is one of the most attractive and fascinating fields of modern medicine, clinical applications in humans have shown a limited number of significant responses and revealed many scientific and practical difficulties relating to the translation of apparently flawless in vitro or animal models to the setting of human cancers.^1–4

Comprehension of the mechanisms of tumor escape represents one of the most relevant acquisitions in immunology and has opened a new challenge for scientists and physicians.^5,6 Tumor cells, in fact, evade recognition and elimination by immune effectors in many ways: i) low or absent expression of tumor-specific antigens; ii) expression of antigens that are shared with normal cells at certain developmental stages, so that the immune system has become self-tolerant or anergic; iii) down-regulation of surface expression of MHC molecules; iv) defective pathways of antigen processing and presentation; v) absence of appropriate co-stimulation to deliver a complete activation stimulus to effector T cells; vi) the presence of inhibitory molecules actively secreted by the tumor itself or by the tumor microenvironment (such as interleukin-10 and transforming growth factor-ß);⁷ and vii) the expansion of naturally occurring or tumor-induced T cells with regulatory activity.^8,9

Besides being capable of efficiently overcoming these multiple mechanisms of immune escape, any application of immunotherapy must consider all the practical issues related to the production of immune cells for clinical use: i) the choice of the right antigen(s) to ensure use in a sufficiently wide category of patients; ii) the development of methods of manipulation, which should be consistently straightforward and not excessively time-consuming, in order to obtain large numbers of cells in a suitable framework; iii) the use of appropriate Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)-grade reagents and procedures which guarantee the exploitation of rigid rules of cell manipulation;¹⁰ iv) the consideration of safety issues related to the possible occurrence of genetic aberrations when using vectors for gene delivery.¹¹

Chimeric T-cell receptors (ChTCR) represent a valuable tool for overcoming the above mentioned obstacles and are certainly an attractive and promising line of medical research, whose clinical application in the near future may give new prospects to tumor immunotherapy.^12–16 The main characteristics of ChTCR are their ability to redirect T-cell specificity and their killing/effector activity toward a selected target in a non-MHC-restricted manner, exploiting the antigen-binding properties of monoclonal antibodies. ChTCR are, in fact, artificial T-cell receptors constituted by an antigen-recognizing antibody molecule linked to a T-cell triggering domain.

The scope of this review is not to describe the technical details concerning the construction of these artificial molecules (reviewed elsewhere¹³), but to illustrate their functional immune aspects and their current or potential impacts on immunotherapy for hematologic malignancies.

	Use of CHTCR-expressing T cells for tumor immunotherapy

TOP ABSTRACT Use of CHTCR-expressing T... Applications of ChTCR in... Limitations and advances in... Concluding remarks: new... References

 
Adoption of virus-specific T cells (cytotoxic T-lymphocytes, CTL) has demonstrated that clinical applications of immunotherapy are feasible and effective when a strong antigen (or a pool of different antigens) is recognized by the immune effectors (the most successful attempts have involved Epstein-Barr virus [EBV] and cytomegalovirus[CMV]-specific CTL).^17–20 Unfortunately, in the context of tumors, the specific antigens are often weak, poorly expressed on the cell surface, or presented in an inappropriate or incomplete way, often accompanied by secretion of inhibitory T-cell factors. Moreover, most tumors can elude major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-restricted T-cell-mediated immune recognition.^5,6 For these reasons, enrichment and expansion of CTL targeting tumor-associated antigens are time-consuming and often ineffective, due to the low frequency of tumor-specific precursors in vivo.¹⁶

Gene manipulation by ChTCR offers the means, in a unique molecule, of augmenting the T-cell immune properties, so that T-cell reactivity can be artificially driven towards selected antigens and their survival, in a hostile tumor milieu, is strongly improved by the addition of endogenous growth factors and co-stimulation signals, or by blocking T-cell inhibitory or pro-apoptotic pathways.^12–16 Several artificial ChTCR have been devised in the last decade.²¹ These molecules are constructed to express a specific antigen-binding domain (the extracellular domain, consisting of the variable chains of a monoclonal antibody), linked together as a single chain Fv (scFv), and a signaling region (the intracellular domain), usually taken from the zeta-chain of the TCR/CD3 complex (Figure 1). When expressed by T cells, the chimeric receptor links up the targeted antigen and triggers the cytolytic cascade of T cells, thus consecutively inducing the killing of the target population.^22,23 The main advantage of this approach is that it relies on the construction of a universal receptor towards a selected single molecule, whose recognition is non-MHC-restricted and independent of antigen processing, thus bypassing all major mechanisms of tumor escape.

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 1. Schematic representation of ChTCR structure with different signaling domains. The signaling domain of ChTCR may be modified to include co-stimulatory signals that improve the activation of ChTCR-expressing cells. Two major classes of co-stimulatory molecules can be distinguished: the B7 receptor family including CD28 and ICOS, recruiting PI3Kinase,63 and the TNFR family, structurally different from the previous one, whose signaling is initiated through TRAF2 engagement.64

	Applications of ChTCR in the context of hematologic malignancies

TOP ABSTRACT Use of CHTCR-expressing T... Applications of ChTCR in... Limitations and advances in... Concluding remarks: new... References

ChTCR targeting CD19 certainly represents the best example of application of this strategy for hematologic tumors and also gives an interesting historical perspective of the evolution of this technology.^24,25 The first requirement to redirect T cells towards a selected tumor target is the identification of an appropriate molecule, which is selectively expressed on cancer cells. With regard to lymphoid tumors of B-cell origin, CD19 is an ideal target, since it is present on virtually all leukemia cells in almost all cases.^16,25 Among hematopoietic cells, CD19 is expressed only on cells belonging to the B-cell compartment. For this reasons, several groups have investigated its use in both in vitro and in vivo animal models.

Jensen, Cooper and colleagues (City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA) and Brentjens and colleagues (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA) were among the first to demonstrate the efficacy of CD19-positive target killing by redirected CD19-ChTCR-expressing T cells, corroborating the in vitro data with a NOD/SCID mice model.^25–29 The initial construct was composed of a CD19-specific single-chain immunoglobulin extracellular targeting domain, fused to a CD3-zeta intracellular signaling domain. It was shown that CD19-redirected CTL were capable of potently killing primary B-ALL blasts and also of producing Th1 cytokines and were consistently proliferating after recognition of the targeted molecule.^26,27 With the aim of translating this approach into a clinical strategy for relapsed B-ALL, Jensen’s group recently focused on umbilical cord-blood transplantation (UCBT), designing a method that complies with principles of current GMP for phase I clinical trials to ensure the identity, purity, potency and safety of the cellular product. UCBT-derived T cells were efficiently redirected towards the CD19⁺ tumor target cells (including B-ALL) by electroporation with a plasmid encoding the CD19-ChTCR, also containing a suicide gene (the herpes virus 1 thymidine kinase, HSV-1 TK, gene).²⁸ Cells were efficiently expanded in relevant numbers for clinical intervention and afterwards cryopreserved for quality controls. CD19-ChTCR-expressing UCBT-derived T cells were capable of CD19-specific killing activity and cytokine secretion in vitro, as well as inducing regression of CD19⁺ tumors in NOD/SCID mice, and being selectively eliminated in vivo after administration of gancyclovir.²⁸ This approach has recently been extended to autologous cell therapy for patients affected by follicular lymphoma, showing that ex vivo cell expansion from cryopreserved cell banks was sufficient to produce doses of between 5x10⁹ and 1x10¹⁰ engineered T cells for each cycle of production.²⁹ This manufacturing strategy is therefore suitable for producing gene-manipulated T cells for phase I clinical trials in the context of B-cell lymphoid malignancies.

Brenner’s group at the Center of Cell and Gene Therapy (CAGT, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA) has also widely investigated the immune properties and possible clinical applications of CD19-redirected T cells, developing methods of large scale clinical-grade production of retroviral vectors containing the CD19-ChTCR for stable integration into transduced T cells.^{12–16,30–32} The most relevant findings obtained by this group are: i) the demonstration that the CD3- signaling domain is not sufficient per se to guarantee complete and prolonged activation of manipulated T cells and that the integration of the signal transduction domain of the co-stimulatory molecule CD28 enhances the proliferative properties of the gene-modified T cells; ii) the fact that dual-specific T cells offer an improved chance of obtaining a larger in vivo expansion of engineered T cells and a long-lasting maintenance of a CD19-redirected T-cell memory pool. In particular, they used EBV-specific CTL. In fact, EBV infection is very common in humans and triggers the generation of high levels of EBV-specific CD4⁺ T helper and CD8⁺ cytotoxic T cells. Dual-specific T cells recognize EBV-infected cells through their conventional native T-cell receptor and the leukemia CD19⁺ target through the artificial ChTCR. Using this stratagem, the engagement of the native TCR in vivo by recurrent EBV infections is capable of constantly stimulating the ChTCR – redirected T cells, assuring appropriate activation of all pathways of T-cell stimulation, thereby also maintaining the lytic activity of the CD19-specific artificial T-cell receptor.

Instead of manipulating conventional T cells, Campana and colleagues (St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA) have explored the use of natural killer (NK) cells.^33,34 NK may improve the therapeutic potential of allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation, but numerous published data have demonstrated that their efficacy is strongly diminished by the presence of various inhibitory HLA types. The authors therefore transduced the CD56⁺CD3^– NK cells with a chimeric receptor directed against CD19. Relevant numbers of NK cells can be obtained in a relatively short time by culturing peripheral blood mononuclear cells with K562 cells expressing the NK-stimulatory molecules 4-1BB ligand and interleukin 15. Anti-CD19 ChTCR-expressing NK cells have a markedly enhanced capacity to kill B-ALL blasts. This model also corroborates the necessity to add a co-stimulatory signal to the CD3- domain. Addition of 4-1BB is, in fact, followed by increased cell activation, with subsequent secretion of interleukin-2 and interferon-.

Using the same retroviral vector kindly provided by Campana and colleagues, our group has recently investigated the efficacy of the CD19-ChTCR in the context of B-cell malignancies, transducing ex vivo expanded cytotokine induced killer (CIK) cells, which are enriched in CD3⁺CD56⁺ CD1d-unrestricted NK-T cells.³⁵ Such cells present peculiar characteristics that render them an attractive target for leukemia immunotherapy, since they have the intrinsic capability of reaching leukemia-infiltrated tissues, primarily the bone marrow. Our results show that CD19-ChTCR-expressing CIK cells not only become capable of efficiently killing otherwise resistant B-ALL cells, but also present high expression levels of adhesion molecules (CD49d and CD11a) and chemokine receptors (CXCR4, CCR6 and CCR7). They also show robust in vitro chemotactic activity towards their corresponding ligands, prominent adhesion and transmigration across endothelium and metalloproteases-dependent invasion of basement membrane in response to CXCL12. All this reflects their potential capability to migrate into sites of B-ALL accumulation and therefore supports the hypothesis that CD19-ChTCR-redirected CIK cells are an interesting tool for B-ALL immunotherapy.³⁵ Moreover, from the stand point of application, CIK cells are attractive because of the reproducible and straightforward method for their generation and expansion, which only requires GMP-grade cytokines. Thus, large numbers of cells can be rapidly expanded in a closed system with minimal manipulation.

Like CD19, the CD20 antigen has also been chosen to target B-cell lymphoid malignancies by ChTCR.^36,37 The use of the monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody rituximab induces remissions in approximately 60% of patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma; however, most patients eventually relapse despite continued expression of CD20 on lymphoma cells. A cellular immunotherapy strategy targeting CD20⁺ cells by ChTRC may provide a more effective mechanism for eliminating lymphoma cells than anti-CD20 antibodies. As for the CD19-ChTCR, Jensen and colleagues electroporated peripheral blood mononuclear cells with a plasmid containing a CD20-specific scFvFc: ChTCR. CD8⁺ CTL clones were generated and showed specific killing capacity towards CD20⁺ target cells, including primary tumor cells from patients affected by follicular lymphoma, small lymphocytic lymphoma, splenic marginal zone lymphoma, diffuse large B cell lymphoma, and CLL.³⁷ Cell numbers were adequate for clinical use. In view of these findings, a phase I clinical trial for relapsed follicular lymphoma is being initiated by Jensen’s group.

As for B-origin malignancies, myeloid leukemias can also be targeted by a ChTCR towards the myeloid antigen CD33. Recently published in vitro data showed that human NK cells can be efficiently manipulated by electroporation, transferring a humanized chimeric immunoglobulin T-cell receptor to CD33. CD33-ChTCR-expressing NK cells specifically lysed the acute myeloid leukemia cell line KG1.³⁸

Finally, an attractive molecule for targeting Hodgkin’s lymphoma tumor cells is the CD30 antigen. In fact, Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells express high amounts of the cell surface antigen CD30. Hombach and colleagues used a retroviral vector containing a ChTCR gene encoding for an extracellular domain consisting of the single-chain antibody fragment HRS3-scFv with specificity for the CD30 antigen. Specific binding of the CD30-ChTCR resulted in cytolytic MHC-unrestricted reactivity against CD30⁺ tumor cells in vitro, thus offering an attractive model for adoptive cellular immunotherapy to be used in the context of resistant Hodgkin’s disease.^39,40

Even though many different molecules have been explored for human hematologic malignancies and clinical trials are ongoing or about to commence, unfortunately no data are yet available in the setting of human hematologic malignancies. However, ChTCR have been used in the setting of patients infected by immunodeficiency virus (HIV). In HIV patients, T cells have been transduced to express a ChTCR containing the extracellular domain of human CD4 which is capable of linking up the viral gp120 protein in order to recognize and eliminate HIV-infected cells. Although ChTCR-transduced T cells were functionally active in vitro and homed to the HIV-infected tissues, the anti-viral efficacy of manipulated cells was negligible.^41,42 In the field of tumor immunotherapy, the use of engineered T cells expressing artificial TCR specific for tumor-associated antigens has recently given promising and exciting results in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Even though the technology is slightly different from that used for chimeric monoclonal antibody-derived artificial receptors, the concept remains the same.⁴³ Patients affected by metastatic melanoma were treated with autologous T cells expressing an anti-MART-1 artificial TCR. Two patients treated out of 15 showed sustained levels of circulating engineered T cells following objective regression of hepatic and pulmonary metastatic lesions.⁴⁴

	Limitations and advances in designing ChTCR

TOP ABSTRACT Use of CHTCR-expressing T... Applications of ChTCR in... Limitations and advances in... Concluding remarks: new... References

 
Besides showing and corroborating the strength of ChTCR technology, the available in vitro and in vivo data also highlight the presence of specific drawbacks, which must be investigated in order to find solutions that ensure better in vivo results in the human cancer setting, whilst limiting any possible side effect.

Limitations of ChTCR involve both clinical and technical issues. As far as concerns clinical limitations, the currently used ChTCR lack sufficient specifity for exclusive tumor antigens. This aspect is particularly evident for the CD19 antigen, whose targeting will be accompanied by elimination of normal B cells constitutively expressing this B-lymphoid associated surface molecule. The use of anti-CD19 ChTCR-redirected T cells in human subjects will, therefore, likely determine a depression of humoral antibody-mediated immunity, which would put any treated cancer patient at further risk and necessitate continuous supplementation of immunoglobulins.¹⁶ Similar considerations are valid for the CD33 antigen, whose expression is extended to various stages of myeloid-lineage differentiation. Therefore, its targeting could potentially be followed by the killing of bone marrow neutrophil progenitors, with increased risk of bacterial and fungal infections. For these reasons, new lines of research are already exploring more tumor-specific surface antigens, with virtually absent expression on normal tissues.¹⁶

As far as concerns the technical weaknesses of current ChTCR, different factors must be taken in account, as summarized in Table 1. The first issue that could easily explain the limited survival of injected ChTCR-expressing cells is the presence of foreign molecules in the chimera (mostly mouse proteins), which induce an immune host response.^14,15 New generation ChTCR will contain entirely humanized proteins, thus avoiding any recognition by the immune system.⁴⁵ If this limitation seems likely to be resolved rapidly by technical improvements already available, the definition of the correct activation cascade that must be included in the ChTCR structure to have a full and long-lasting activation of manipulated T cells is more complex. It seems clear, in fact, that the activation following engagement of naïve TCR gives rise to a more complex and powerful activation of T cells, which cannot be totally provided by the existing ChTCR.⁴⁶ In line with these considerations, the role of co-stimulation appears to be crucial. Second generation ChTCR all contain a more complex signaling domain, which contains different endo-domains with co-stimulatory capacity (CD28, ICOS, CD134 or CD137) (Figure 1).^12–16 Such improved molecules induce a better activation of manipulated target cells, with a higher rate of proliferation, higher level of secretion of interleukin-2 and prolonged survival. The signaling characteristics of ChTCR can be further improved by linking in cis more than one co-stimulatory domain or a combination of co-stimulatory and coreceptor domains to the TCR- chain. Linking the CD28 with the OX40 domain has been shown to greatly enhance the functions of ChTCR-transduced cells with markedly increased proliferation, cytokine release and effector function.³² Moreover the combination of chain together with co-receptor (lck) and co-stimulatory (CD28) signals in a single receptor has been demonstrated to maximize ChTCR sensitivity and potency.^47,48

One of the most delicate and discussed topics of any gene transfer approach remains the theoretical chance of inducing oncogenic mutations after DNA integration of the vector. In 2002 Alain Fischer’s group reported the occurrence of two cases of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in two children previously treated with gene-manipulated stem cells for correction of their X-linked SCID immunodeficiency.^53–55 In both cases an inappropriate activation of LMO-2 transcription factor was detected due to proximal insertion of the missing immune gene by the retroviral vector. As thoroughly discussed by Dotti et al. in their review,¹⁶ even though this serious adverse event triggered a sort of innate fear for any approach using any viral vector for the correction of any kind of human disease in the entire scientific community, nevertheless this was the only serious event that has occurred so far in more than 40 human trials that have used integrating vectors, and may likely be explained by the peculiarity of the targeted disease (the SCID immunodeficiency) and the type of cells which were genetically manipulated (hematopoietic stem cells).^56,57 In fact, considerable amounts of stem cells were manipulated with the aim of guaranteeing the correction of the immune deficit. Moreover, the transduced T cells, expressing the inserted gene, had a proliferative advantage over the unmanipulated cells. On the other hand, in all the trials that adopted gene transfer of mature T lymphocytes, no malignant transformation has ever been observed, primarily because such mature cells have a limited proliferative capacity and have already reached a stage of terminal differentiation. Obviously, this does not mean that safety considerations regarding the use of integrating vectors are not important, especially when considering (such as for transduced ChTCR-cells) that gene transfer of co-stimulatory molecules or growth-promoting molecules may improve the survival and increase the proliferation rate of gene-manipulated T cells. This automatically implies that efficient systems of suicide genes are welcome, because they constitute a back-up protection tool, which may be used in the case of unwanted proliferation.⁵⁸

	Concluding remarks: new challenges for the near future

TOP ABSTRACT Use of CHTCR-expressing T... Applications of ChTCR in... Limitations and advances in... Concluding remarks: new... References

 
The above-mentioned considerations on redirecting cytotoxic T cells towards leukemia/lymphoma-associated antigens show clearly how fascinating ChTCR technology is, but also demonstrate that complex obstacles still bar the way to an effective therapy in the context of leukemias. Only a collaborative multi-center study can provide the opportunity to study the mechanisms underlying the actual limitations of this approach (both in vitro and in vivo) and to translate this kind of therapy from bench to bed-side in the context of phase 1 trials for acute lymphoid and myeloid leukemias and lymphomas. A consortium has been recently founded thanks to funds from the European Community (STREP, Specific Targeted Research or Innovation Project, Sixth Framework Programme), which connects different centers, physicians and researchers from all over Europe. The name of the project is Childhope (www.childhope.eu). The main goal of this collaborative study is to make human T cells that express ChTCR specific for the CD19 and the CD33 antigens, for lymphoid and myeloid malignancies, respectively. These vectors will be used to transduce different types of cell targets (dual-specific EBV-CTL, CIK cells, - T cells), with the aim of comparing their in vitro and in vivo efficacy and finally choosing the more potent and persistent stimulation on the artificial receptor towards the selected tumor antigen. After an initial phase, whose only scope will be to validate the potency of the manipulated cells in vitro and in vivo in animal models, the consortium will assess the safety and potency of the ChTCR-expressing T cells specific for CD19 or CD33 in phase I studies conducted in children with relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoid leukemias, non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas, or acute myeloid leukemias, respectively. With the aim of improving the safety profile of gene transfer, the consortium will evaluate alternative methods of T-cell gene transfer, such as large-scale electroporation of T cells with mRNA (as a means to transduce T cells transiently),⁵⁹ in comparison with self-inactivating vectors (SIN), which are characterized by a different pattern of DNA integration able to give a better safety profile.⁶⁰ Moreover, always with the aim of maintaining a high efficiency, but concomitantly guaranteeing a way to control any possible in vivo unwanted T-cell proliferation, a suicide gene system will be adopted and different combinations will be tested. In particular, attention will be focused on the chRec-iCasp9 suicide system, whose efficiency has been recently demonstrated.⁶¹

In conclusion, even though the clinical facts of leukemia immunotherapy are few and many difficulties stand in the way of translating any experimental approach into clinical intervention,⁶² the ChTCR strategy represents an attractive targeted weapon against leukemias. Technical and safety improvements are still required, and phase 1 trials will be carried out in the near future to show the feasibility of their clinical translation and, it is to be hoped, give preliminary indications about their anti-tumor efficacy.

	Footnotes

 
Author Contributions

EB and VM analysed the literature and wrote the manuscript; ED, GMPGA and AB were responsible for critical revision of the text.

Conflict of Interest

The authors reported no potential conflictrs of interest.

Funding: the present work was supported by AIRC, FIRC and MIUR PRIN 2005 2005065223_002.

Received for publication October 4, 2006. Accepted for publication January 26, 2007.

	References

TOP ABSTRACT Use of CHTCR-expressing T... Applications of ChTCR in... Limitations and advances in... Concluding remarks: new... References

 

1. Bordignon C, Carlo-Stella C, Colombo MP, De Vincentiis A, Lanata L, Lemoli RM, et al. Cell therapy: achievements and perspectives. Haematologica 1999;84:1110-49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Biagi E, Rousseau RF, Yvon E, Vigouroux S, Dotti G, Brenner MK. Cancer vaccines: dream, reality, or nightmare? Clin Exp Med 2002;2:109-18.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
3. Gattinoni L, Powell DJ Jr, Rosenberg SA, Restifo NP. Adoptive immunotherapy for cancer: building on success. Nat Rev Immunol 2006;6:383-93.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
4. Waldmann TA. Immunotherapy: past, present and future. Nat Med 2003;9:269-77.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
5. Campoli M, Ferrone S, Zea AH, Rodriguez PC, Ochoa AC. Mechanisms of tumor evasion. Cancer Treat Res 2005;123:61-88.[Medline]
6. Mapara MY, Sykes M. Tolerance and cancer: mechanisms of tumor evasion and strategies for breaking tolerance. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:1136-51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Taylor A, Verhagen J, Blaser K, Akdis M, Akdis CA. Mechanisms of immune suppression by interleukin-10 and transforming growth factor-beta: the role of T regulatory cells. Immunology 2006;117:433-42.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
8. Zou W. Regulatory T cells, tumour immunity and immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol 2006;6:295-307.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
9. Wang RF. Functional control of regulatory T cells and cancer immunotherapy. Semin Cancer Biol 2006;16:106-14.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
10. Giordano R, Lazzari L, Rebulla P. Clinical grade cell manipulation. Vox Sang 2004;87:65-72.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
11. Nienhuis AW, Dunbar CE, Sorrentino BP. Genotoxicity of retro-viral integration in hematopoietic cells. Mol Ther 2006;13:1031-49.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
12. Pule M, Bollard CM, Heslop HE. Genetically engineered T-cells for adoptive immunotherapy. Curr Opin Mol Ther 2002;4:467-75.[ISI][Medline]
13. Pule M, Finney H, Lawson A. Artificial T-cell receptors. Cytotherapy 2003;5:211-26.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
14. Rossig C, Brenner MK. Chimeric T-cell receptors for the targeting of cancer cells. Acta Haematol 2003;110:154-9.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
15. Rossig C, Brenner MK. Genetic modification of T lymphocytes for adoptive immunotherapy. Mol Ther 2004;10:5-18.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
16. Dotti G, Heslop HE. Current status of genetic modification of T cells for cancer treatment. Cytotherapy 2005;7:262-72.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
17. Heslop HE, Ng CY, Li C, Smith CA, Loftin SK, Krance RA, et al. Long-term restoration of immunity against Epstein-Barr virus infection by adoptive transfer of gene-modified virus-specific T lymphocytes. Nat Med 1996;2:551-5.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
18. Rooney CM, Smith CA, Ng CY, Loftin SK, Sixbey JW, Gan Y, et al. Infusion of cytotoxic T cells for the prevention and treatment of Epstein-Barr virus-induced lymphoma in allogeneic transplant recipients. Blood 1998;92:1549-55.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Peggs KS, Verfuerth S, Pizzey A, Khan N, Guiver M, Moss PA, et al. Adoptive cellular therapy for early cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation with virus-specific T-cell lines. Lancet 2003;362:1375-7.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
20. Einsele H, Roosnek E, Rufer N, Sinzger C, Riegler S, Loffler J, et al. Infusion of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T cells for the treatment of CMV infection not responding to antiviral chemotherapy. Blood 2002;99:3916-22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Riviere I, Sadelain M, Brentjens RJ. Novel strategies for cancer therapy: the potential of genetically modified T lymphocytes. Curr Hematol Rep 2004;3:290-7.[Medline]
22. Eshhar Z, Waks T, Gross G, Schindler DG. Specific activation and targeting of cytotoxic lymphocytes through chimeric single chains consisting of antibody-binding domains and the gamma or zeta subunits of the immunoglobulin and T-cell receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90:720-4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Friedmann-Morvinski D, Bendavid A, Waks T, Schindler D, Eshhar Z. Redirected primary T cells harboring a chimeric receptor require co-stimulation for their antigen-specific activation. Blood 2005;105:3087-93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Brentjens RJ. Novel approaches to immunotherapy for B-cell malignancies. Curr Hematol Rep 2005;4:64-72.[Medline]
25. Brentjens RJ, Latouche JB, Santos E, Marti F, Gong MC, Lyddane C, et al. Eradication of systemic B-cell tumors by genetically targeted human T lymphocytes co-stimulated by CD80 and interleukin-15. Nat Med 2003;9:279-86.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
26. Cooper LJ, Topp MS, Serrano LM, Gonzalez S, Chang WC, Naranjo A, et al. T-cell clones can be rendered specific for CD19: toward the selective augmentation of the graft-versus-B-lineage leukemia effect. Blood 2003;101:1637-44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Cooper LJ, Al-Kadhimi Z, Serrano LM, Pfeiffer T, Olivares S, Castro A, et al. Enhanced antilymphoma efficacy of CD19-redirected influenza MP1-specific CTLs by co-transfer of T cells modified to present influenza MP1. Blood 2005;105:1622-31.
28. Serrano LM, Pfeiffer T, Olivares S, Numbenjapon T, Bennitt J, Kim D, et al. Differentiation of naive cord-blood T. Blood 2006;107:2643-52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Cooper LJ, Ausubel L, Gutierrez M, Stephan S, Shakeley R, Olivares S, et al. Manufacturing of gene-modified cytotoxic T lymphocytes for autologous cellular therapy or lymphoma. Cytotherapy 2006;8:105-17.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
30. Roessig C, Scherer SP, Baer A, Vormoor J, Rooney CM, Brenner MK, Juergens H. Targeting CD19 with genetically modified EBV-specific human T lymphocytes. Ann Hematol 2002;81 Suppl_2: S42-3.[ISI][Medline]
31. Rossig C, Bar A, Pscherer S, Altvater B, Pule M, Rooney CM, et al. Target antigen expression on a professional antigen-presenting cell induces superior proliferative antitumor T-cell responses via chimeric T-cell receptors. J Immunother 2006;29:21-31.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
32. Pule MA, Straathof KC, Dotti G, Heslop HE, Rooney CM, Brenner MK. A chimeric T cell antigen receptor that augments cytokine release and supports clonal expansion of primary human T cells. Mol Ther 2005;12:933-41.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
33. Imai C, Mihara K, Andreansky M, Nicholson IC, Pui CH, Geiger TL, et al. Chimeric receptors with 4-1BB signaling capacity provoke potent cytotoxicity against acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 2004;18:676-84.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
34. Imai C, Iwamoto S, Campana D. Genetic modification of primary natural killer cells overcomes inhibitory signals and induces specific killing of leukemic cells. Blood 2005;106:376-83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Marin V, Dander E, Biagi E, Introna M, Fazio G, Biondi A, et al. Characterization of in vitro migratory properties of anti-CD19 chimeric receptor-redirected CIK cells for their potential use in B-ALL immunotherapy. Exp Hematol 2006;34:1218-28.[CrossRef]
36. Jensen MC, Cooper LJ, Wu AM, Forman SJ, Raubitschek A. Cytotherapy 2003;5:131-8.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
37. Wang J, Press OW, Lindgren CG, Greenberg P, Riddell S, Qian X, et al. Cellular immunotherapy for follicular lymphoma using genetically modified CD20-specific CD8⁺ cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Mol Ther 2004;9:577-86.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
38. Schirrmann T, Pecher G. Specific targeting of CD33⁺leukemia cells by a natural killer cell line modified with a chimeric receptor. Leuk Res 2005;29:301-6.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
39. Hombach A, Heuser C, Sircar R, Tillmann T, Diehl V, Pohl C, et al. Characterization of a chimeric T-cell receptor with specificity for the Hodgkin’s lymphoma-associated CD30 antigen. J Immunother 1999;22:473-80.[ISI][Medline]
40. Hombach A, Muche JM, Gerken M, Gellrich S, Heuser C, Pohl C, et al. T cells engrafted with a recombinant anti-CD30 receptor target autologous CD30⁺cutaneous lymphoma cells. Gene Ther 2001;8:891-5.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
41. Mitsuyasu RT, Anton PA, Deeks SG, Scadden DT, Connick E, Downs MT, et al. Prolonged survival and tissue trafficking following adoptive transfer of CD4 gene-modified autologous CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells in human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects. Blood 2000;96:785-93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Deeks SG, Wagner B, Anton PA, Mitsuyasu RT, Scadden DT, Huang C, et al. A phase II randomized study of HIV-specific T-cell gene therapy in subjects with undetectable plasma viremia on combination antiretroviral therapy. Mol Ther 2002;5:788-97.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
43. Mommaas B, van Halteren AG, Pool J, van der Veken L, Wieles B, Heemskerk MH, et al. Adult and cord blood T cells can acquire HA-1 specificity through HA-1 T-cell receptor gene transfer. Haematologica 2005;90:1415-21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Morgan RA, Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR, Hughes MS, Yang JC, Sherry RM, et al. Cancer regression in patients after transfer of genetically engineered lymphocytes. Science 2006;314:126-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Hombach A, Schneider C, Sent D, Koch D, Willemsen RA, et al. An entirely humanized CD3 zeta-chain signaling receptor that directs peripheral blood T cells to specific lysis of carcinoembryonic antigen-positive tumor cells. Int J Cancer 2000;88:115-20.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
46. Finney HM, Lawson AD, Bebbington CR, Weir AN. Chimeric receptors providing both primary and costimulatory signaling in T cells from a single gene product. J Immunol 1998;161:2791-7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Fitzer-Attas CJ, Schindler DG, Waks T, Eshhar Z. Harnessing Syk family tyrosine kinases as signaling domains for chimeric single chain of the variable domain receptors: optimal design for T cell activation. J Immunol 1998;160:145-54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Geiger TL, Nguyen P, Leitenberg D, Flavell RA. Integrated src kinase and costimulatory activity enhances signal transduction through single-chain chimeric receptors in T lymphocytes. Blood 2001;98:2364-71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Heemskerk MH, Hagedoorn RS, van der Hoorn MA, van der Veken LT, Hoogeboom M, Kester MG, et al. Efficiency of T cell receptor expression in dual specific T cells is controlled by the intrinsic qualities of the TCR chains within the TCR-CD3 complex. Blood 2007;109:235-43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Taylor GS, Haigh TA, Gudgeon NH, Phelps RJ, Lee SP, Steven NM, et al. Dual stimulation of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)-specific CD4⁺- and CD8⁺-T-cell responses by a chimeric antigen construct: potential therapeutic vaccine for EBV-positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Virol 2004;78:768-78.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Rossig C, Bollard CM, Nuchtern JG, Rooney CM, Brenner MK. Epstein-Barr virus-specific human T lymphocytes expressing antitumor chimeric T-cell receptors: potential for improved immunotherapy. Blood 2002;99:2009-16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Heemskerk MH, Hoogeboom M, Hagedoorn R, Kester MG, Willemze R, Falkenburg JH. Reprogramming of virus-specific T cells into leukemia-reactive T cells using T cell receptor gene transfer. J Exp Med 2004;199:885-94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Hacein-Bey-Abina S, von Kalle C, Schmidt M, Le Deist F, Wulffraat N, McIntyre E, et al. A serious adverse event after successful gene therapy for X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. N Engl J Med 2003;348:255-6.[Free Full Text]
54. Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Von Kalle C, Schmidt M, McCormack MP, Wulffraat N, Leboulch P, et al. LMO2-associated clonal T cell proliferation in two patients after gene therapy for SCID-X1. Science 2003;302:415-19.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Dave UP, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG. Gene therapy insertional mutagenesis insights. Science 2004;303:33.[CrossRef][ISI]
56. Kohn DB, Sadelain M, Dunbar C, Bodine D, Kiem HP, Candotti F, et al. American Society of Gene Therapy (ASGT) ad hoc subcommittee on retroviral-mediated gene transfer to hematopoietic stem cells. Mol Ther 2003;8:180-7.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
57. Kohn DB, Sadelain M, Glorioso JC. Occurrence of leukaemia following gene therapy of X-linked SCID. Nat Rev Cancer 2003;3:477-88.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
58. Qasim W, Gaspar HB, Thrasher AJ. T cell suicide gene therapy to aid haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Curr Gene Ther 2005;5:121-32.[ISI][Medline]
59. Li LH, Shivakumar R, Feller S, Allen C, Weiss JM, Dzekunov S, et al. Highly efficient, large volume flow electroporation. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2002;1:341-50.[Medline]
60. Ellis J. Silencing and variegation of gammaretrovirus and lentivirus vectors. Hum Gene Ther 2005;16:1241-6.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
61. Straathof KC, Pule MA, Yotnda P, Dotti G, Vanin EF, Brenner MK, et al. An inducible caspase 9 safety switch for T-cell therapy. Blood 2005;105:4247-54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
62. Introna M, Barbui AM, Golay J, Rambaldi A. Innovative cell-based therapies in onco-hematology: what are the clinical facts? Haematologica 2004;89:1253-60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
63. Rudd CE, Schneider H. Unifying concepts in CD28, ICOS and CTLA4 co-receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol 2003;3:544-56.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
64. Watts TH. TNF/TNFR family members in co-stimulation of T cell responses. Annu Rev Immunol 2005;23:23-68.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Biagi, E. Articles by Biondi, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Biagi, E. Articles by Biondi, A.