Haematologica, Vol 92, Issue 6, 838-841 doi:10.3324/haematol.10955
Copyright © 2007 by Ferrata Storti Foundation
Heiko Konig ,
Nicolai Härtel ,
Beate Schultheis ,
Michael Schatz ,
Christian Lorentz ,
Junia V. Melo ,
Rüdiger Hehlmann ,
Andreas Hochhaus ,
Paul La Rosée
The development of resistance to imatinib mesylate may partly depend on high Bcr-Abl-expression levels. Arsenic trioxide (ATO) has Bcr-Abl suppressing activity in vitro. Here we investigated means to improve ATO activity in CML by modulating cellular glutathione (GSH), a key regulator of ATO-activity in malignant disease. Our studies demonstrate that depletion of cellular glutathione using dl-buthionine-[S,R]-sulfoximine (BSO) enhances ATO activity against CML cells. GSH-depletion promotes enhanced Bcr-Abl specific activity of ATO through avid repression of Bcr-Abl protein levels and total cellular Bcr-Abl activity. These data provide a rationale for the clinical development of optimized ATO-based regimens through incorporation of GSH-modulators in CML treatment.
Cellular material and cell culture
Cell line experiments were performed using the established imatinib-sensitive AR230-s and KCL22-s, and their imatinib-resistant counterparts AR230-r, and KCL22-r.11 In AR230-r, and KCL22-r cells, imatinib-resistance (defined as unaffected viability in the presence of 1 µM imatinib) was originally induced through continuous culture of cells in the presence of imatinib (1 µM). In AR230-r cells, imatinib resistance was traced to Bcr-Abl overexpression, whereas no specific resistance mechanism was detected in KCL22-r cells.11 Also, known ATO-sensitive cell lines (K562, NB4) were used as controls.5,8 All cell lines were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 2% L-glutamine (Gibco BRL), 1% penicillin-streptomycin and heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco BRL, Wiesbaden, Germany). Primary cells were obtained from peripheral blood specimens of four patients with blast crisis CML resistant to imatinib. Informed consent was obtained from all patients according to the declaration of Helsinki. Cell culture was performed in 5% CO2/95% O2 air, in a 37°C fully humidified incubator.
GSHhigh CML cells show innate resistance against ATO, which can be overcome by GSH-depletion
In pilot experiments, the antiproliferative activity of ATO was determined in a panel of CML cell lines sensitive or resistant to the Bcr-Abl-inhibitor imatinib and correlated to the cellular GSH levels (only selected data are shown, Table 1). Intracellular GSH measurements were performed after pre-treatment with BSO (100 µM) for 12 hours, and after continued treatment for 24 hours and 48 hours with BSO (100 µM) and/or ATO (1 µM), respectively. While the CML cell line K562 shows ATO-sensitivity similar to the highly sensitive promyelocytic NB4 cells, AR230-s/r, and KCL-s/r are intrinsically resistant against ATO with IC50-values beyond 2 µM. This concentration represents the upper margin of the clinically useful range.14 The most sensitive NB4 cells express low GSH levels (14.7±3.9 nmoL/mg), while highly resistant AR230-r cells show a fourfold increased GSH-content. Depletion of cellular GSH by treatment with BSO (Figure 1A) shows no cytotoxicity in trypan blue viability assays (Figure 1B) using AR230-s/r, and KCL22-s/r cells. However, the combination of ATO with BSO is synergistic leading to a rapid loss of cell viability within 24 hrs (Figure 1B).
Therefore, similar to PML/RAR
positive leukemia,8,15 high intracellular GSH is a determinant of ATO-sensitivity in BCR-ABL expressing cells. Consistent with viability data, 24 hours co-treatment with 1 µM ATO and 100 µM BSO leads to a 3- (AR230-r, KCL22-s, KCL22-r) to 6-fold (AR230-s) increase in the fraction of apoptotic annexinV-positive (Ann+)/PI-negative (PI-) cells when compared to untreated controls (Figure 1C). By contrast, a moderate or no increase in apoptotic cells was observed in all 4 cell lines when treated with 1 µM ATO or 100 µM BSO alone.
In conclusion, our data support the development of arsenicals in combination with GSH-depleters to combat abundant Bcr-Abl expression as a mechanism of imatinib resistance.
we are indebted to Dr. Christel Weiss (Department of Biostatistics) for critical analysis of the data and statistical analysis. We thank Cell Therapeutics Inc. (Seattle) for providing ATO (TrisenoxTM)
Authors’ Contributions
Copyright © 2007 by Ferrata Storti Foundation
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia |
Enhanced Bcr-Abl-specific antileukemic activity of arsenic trioxide through glutathione-depletion in imatinib-resistant cells
From the III. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany (HK, NH, BS, MS, CL, RH, AH, PLR); Department of Hematology, Imperial College & Hammersmith Hospital London, United Kingdom (JVM)
Correspondence: Paul La Rosée, Klinikum Mannheim gGmbH, III. Medizinische Klinik Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 7, D- 68167 Mannheim, Germany. E-mail: paul.larosee{at}med3.ma.uniheidelberg.de
ABSTRACT
 TOP ABSTRACT Design and MethodsResults and DiscussionReferences |
|---|
The development of resistance to imatinib mesylate may partly depend on high Bcr-Abl-expression levels. Arsenic trioxide (ATO) has Bcr-Abl suppressing activity in vitro. Here we investigated means to improve ATO activity in CML by modulating cellular glutathione (GSH), a key regulator of ATO-activity in malignant disease. Our studies demonstrate that depletion of cellular glutathione using dl-buthionine-[S,R]-sulfoximine (BSO) enhances ATO activity against CML cells. GSH-depletion promotes enhanced Bcr-Abl specific activity of ATO through avid repression of Bcr-Abl protein levels and total cellular Bcr-Abl activity. These data provide a rationale for the clinical development of optimized ATO-based regimens through incorporation of GSH-modulators in CML treatment.
Key words: CML, Bcr-Abl, arsenic, glutathione, Imatinib, resistance.
In chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), mechanisms of resistance to imatinib mesylate (Glivec), a selective Bcr-Abl kinase inhibitor, have been traced to Bcr-Abl reactivation, most frequently by mutations in the kinase domain of Bcr-Abl,1 or to BCR-ABL amplification.2 Bcr-Abl overexpression not only directly modulates sensitivity to imatinib,3 it may also indirectly influence treatment response by influencing the rate of mutation development in the kinase domain.4 We previously demonstrated the ability of arsenic trioxide (As2O3, ATO, TrisenoxTM, Cell Therapeutics, Seattle, USA) to make imatinib resistant cell lines and primary cells susceptible to imatinib-induced growth inhibition and apoptosis.5 Furthermore, we were able to confirm previous reports6 that ATO-induced downregulation of Bcr-Abl protein expression leads to reduced total cellular Bcr-Abl activity in imatinib-resistant cell lines that are characterized by Bcr-Abl dependent resistance.5 Nimmanapalli et al. have traced the mechanism of ATO-dependent Bcr-Abl-suppression to specific inhibition of translation.7 Given the inverse relationship between glutathione-levels and the antileukemic activity of ATO,8,9 we asked whether ATO-activity could be increased by modulation of cellular glutathione (GSH). The effects of GSH-modulation on the antileukemic activity of ATO in CML were studied using dl-buthionine-[S,R]-sulfoximine (BSO), a specific and irreversible inhibitior of the rate limiting enzyme in GSH-biosynthesis 
-glutamylcysteine synthetase.10
Design and Methods
|
TOPABSTRACTDesign and MethodsResults and DiscussionReferences |
|---|
Cellular material and cell culture
Cell line experiments were performed using the established imatinib-sensitive AR230-s and KCL22-s, and their imatinib-resistant counterparts AR230-r, and KCL22-r.11 In AR230-r, and KCL22-r cells, imatinib-resistance (defined as unaffected viability in the presence of 1 µM imatinib) was originally induced through continuous culture of cells in the presence of imatinib (1 µM). In AR230-r cells, imatinib resistance was traced to Bcr-Abl overexpression, whereas no specific resistance mechanism was detected in KCL22-r cells.11 Also, known ATO-sensitive cell lines (K562, NB4) were used as controls.5,8 All cell lines were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 2% L-glutamine (Gibco BRL), 1% penicillin-streptomycin and heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco BRL, Wiesbaden, Germany). Primary cells were obtained from peripheral blood specimens of four patients with blast crisis CML resistant to imatinib. Informed consent was obtained from all patients according to the declaration of Helsinki. Cell culture was performed in 5% CO2/95% O2 air, in a 37°C fully humidified incubator.
Drugs
As2O3 stock solution (Trisenox 1mg/mL, approximately 5 mM) was stored at room temperature. L-buthionine sulfoximine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was freshly prepared for each experiment as a 10 mM solution in water and filtered sterilized. It was added to the cells at the clinically relevant concentration of 100 µM.12 A 10 mmol/L stock solution of imatinib mesylate (Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) was prepared in sterile phosphate-buffered saline and stored at –20°C.
Proliferation assay (MTS assay)
Cellular growth was evaluated using the MTS Cell Titer 96 Aqueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Quantification of intracellular glutathione (GSH)
Intracellular GSH content was determined using the Glutathione Assay Kit (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To adjust cellular GSH to total cellular protein, pelleted cells were lysed in 1N NaOH and protein content was analyzed using the Bradford method.
Western blot
Western blot analysis was performed as previously described,13 using anti-abl (8E9, BD Pharmingen, Heidelberg, Germany) and anti-pTyr (4G10, Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY) antibodies. Equal protein loading was ensured by blotting for actin with the Actin (Ab-1) kit (Oncogene, Boston, MA, USA).
Apoptosis assay
Detection of apoptotic cells was performed using Annexin V-FLUOS staining kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Stained cells were analyzed by flow cytometry on a FACSscan run on the CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson, Oxford, UK).
Data analysis
Statistical analysis was performed to assess significant differences between treatment conditions using the t-test on the SAS software (SAS release 8.02).
Results and Discussion
|
TOPABSTRACTDesign and MethodsResults and DiscussionReferences |
|---|
GSHhigh CML cells show innate resistance against ATO, which can be overcome by GSH-depletion
In pilot experiments, the antiproliferative activity of ATO was determined in a panel of CML cell lines sensitive or resistant to the Bcr-Abl-inhibitor imatinib and correlated to the cellular GSH levels (only selected data are shown, Table 1). Intracellular GSH measurements were performed after pre-treatment with BSO (100 µM) for 12 hours, and after continued treatment for 24 hours and 48 hours with BSO (100 µM) and/or ATO (1 µM), respectively. While the CML cell line K562 shows ATO-sensitivity similar to the highly sensitive promyelocytic NB4 cells, AR230-s/r, and KCL-s/r are intrinsically resistant against ATO with IC50-values beyond 2 µM. This concentration represents the upper margin of the clinically useful range.14 The most sensitive NB4 cells express low GSH levels (14.7±3.9 nmoL/mg), while highly resistant AR230-r cells show a fourfold increased GSH-content. Depletion of cellular GSH by treatment with BSO (Figure 1A) shows no cytotoxicity in trypan blue viability assays (Figure 1B) using AR230-s/r, and KCL22-s/r cells. However, the combination of ATO with BSO is synergistic leading to a rapid loss of cell viability within 24 hrs (Figure 1B).
|
View this table: [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Table 1. Antiproliferative activity of ATO in relation to cellular GSH.
|
 View larger version (17K): [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Figure 1. Depletion of cellular GSH in GSHHigh cells by treatment with BSO translates in enhanced growth inhibition in proliferation assays. (A) Intracellular GSH (in nmoL/mg total cellular protein, y-axis) after 12 hours pre-treatment with 100 µM BSO and subsequent exposure to 1 µM ATO and/or continued treatment with 100 µM BSO for 24 hours. Values are given as means of at least 3 experiments ± standard deviation for AR230-s, AR230-r, KCL22-s and KCL22-r cells. Trypan blue viability count of the respective cell lines every 24 h for two consecutive days (x-axis) (B). Combination treatment (p) was compared to single agent treatment or no treatment at all. Data are graphed as viable cells x105/mL (y-axis). Synergistic induction of apoptosis in GSHHigh cell lines by combined treatment with ATO/BSO (C). Mean percentage of apoptotic cells (y-axis) after ATO-treatment with and without 100 µM BSO. Columns represent compiled data derived from three independent experiments ± standard deviation. *: p< 0.05; **: p<0.001; ***: p<0.0001. Synergistic Bcr-Abl protein suppression by combination treatment with ATO/BSO. (D) Representative immunoblot of at least 3 independent experiments for detection of tyrosine phosphorylated Bcr-Abl (pBcr-Abl), total cellular Bcr-Abl and Actin in imatinib-resistant AR230-r cells (left). Results of densitometric analysis of immunoblots derived from whole cell lysates of AR230-r and KCL22-r cells (right). Bcr-Abl (white) and tyrosine phosphorylated Bcr-Abl (black) were normalized to Actin expression levels as loading control. Data are calculated as percent change of optical density (y-axis) vs control (untreated). Statistical analysis reveals significant (p<0.05) downregulation of total Bcr-Abl and pBcr-Abl as soon as 24 hours after exposure to combined treatment.
|
positive leukemia,8,15 high intracellular GSH is a determinant of ATO-sensitivity in BCR-ABL expressing cells. Consistent with viability data, 24 hours co-treatment with 1 µM ATO and 100 µM BSO leads to a 3- (AR230-r, KCL22-s, KCL22-r) to 6-fold (AR230-s) increase in the fraction of apoptotic annexinV-positive (Ann+)/PI-negative (PI-) cells when compared to untreated controls (Figure 1C). By contrast, a moderate or no increase in apoptotic cells was observed in all 4 cell lines when treated with 1 µM ATO or 100 µM BSO alone.
Combined treatment with ATO and BSO leads to rapid downregulation of Bcr-Abl protein levels
At 1–2 µM, ATO has previously been shown to down-regulate ectopically expressed or endogenous Bcr-Abl in cell lines and primary CML cells via translational mechanisms after 48 hours treatment.7,13 Therefore, the impact of BSO co-treatment on the Bcr-Abl-specific activity of ATO in AR230-r and KCL22-r cells was investigated. Treatment with 1 µM ATO and 100 µM BSO for 24 hours results in downregulation of Bcr-Abl protein and autophosphorylation levels when compared to untreated controls (Figure 1D). Enhanced Bcr-Abl suppression is associated with enhanced inhibition of proliferation (Figure 1B) and induction of cell death by apoptosis (Figure 1C). The nearly complete abrogation of Bcr-Abl protein expression observed in the Bcr-Abl overexpressing AR230-r cells, is particularly important for clinical resistance or refractoriness to imatinib. Bcr-Abl-amplification is a known mechanism of resistance in patients treated with imatinib.2,16 In cell lines, the expression level of Bcr-Abl determines the sensitivity to imatinib17 but also determines the rate of development of resistance eventually triggered by kinase domain mutations of Bcr-Abl.4 Kinase domain mutations are the most frequently detected resistance mechanism in patients.18 A reduced development of resistance can be expected when imatinib is combined with agents that have the potential to suppress Bcr-Abl protein expression. Bcr-Abl protein suppressors such as ATO/BSO may therefore serve as a starting point in the search for agents that can reduce the incidence of imatinib resistance by modulating Bcr-Abl expression. Finally, high expression levels of Bcr-Abl in CML stem cells19 is thought to impart imatinib resistance in the leukemogenic stem cell compartment, which cannot be overcome even by high affinity second generation inhibitors such dasatinib.19 Nimmanapalli et al.7 have already demonstrated the Bcr-Abl-suppressing activity of ATO in CD34+ CML cells. However, the drug concentration of 2 µM used is at the upper end of the clinically useful range. Also, ATO alone is not able to induce apoptosis in nonproliferating CD34+ progenitors.20 Therefore, combined treatment with BSO may strengthen ATO activity against the stem cell compartment while allowing less toxic drug concentrations of ATO. However, further experiments are needed to support this hypothesis.
BSO enhances the cytotoxic activity of ATO in primary CML cells
Based on the evidence that BSO enhances the cytotoxic activity of ATO in immortalized CML cell lines, MNC derived from 4 patients with imatinib resistant CML in blast crisis were analyzed in proliferation assays (Figure 2). One µM ATO applied as a single agent, does not decrease viability similar to the results seen with the AR230-s/r, and KCL22-s/r cell lines. In primary cells, BSO alone shows some antileukemic activity consistent with earlier reports.21 However, combined treatment with 1 µM ATO and 100 µM BSO leads to maximum decrease in cell viability in all four patient samples compared to single agent treatment.
 View larger version (10K): [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Figure 2. Enhanced antileukemic activity by combination treatment with ATO/BSO in primary blasts of imatinib-resistant CML patients. Trypan blue viability count of PB MNCs derived from four CML patients in blast crisis resistant to imatinib. Viability was analyzed after 1, 2 and 3 days (x-axis) of in vitro exposure to ATO and/or BSO in liquid media (RPMI1640 + 10% FBS). Data are graphed as viable cells x105/mL (y-axis).
|
Acknowledgments
we are indebted to Dr. Christel Weiss (Department of Biostatistics) for critical analysis of the data and statistical analysis. We thank Cell Therapeutics Inc. (Seattle) for providing ATO (TrisenoxTM)
Footnotes
Authors’ Contributions
HK: performed experiments, wrote manuscript draft; NH: performed primary cell experiments; BS: revised manuscript draft, performed Western studies; MS: treated patients, provided sample material, revised manuscript draft; CL: treated patients, provided sample material, revised manuscript draft; JM: created imatinib resistant cell lines, revised manuscript; RH: supervised study, revised manuscript; AH: supervised study, revised manuscript; PLR: designed study, wrote the manuscript.
The authors reported no potential conflicts of interest.
Funding: PLR is funded by the Max-Eder program of the Deutsche Krebshilfe.
Received for publication October 26, 2006. Accepted for publication April 12, 2007.
References
|
TOPABSTRACTDesign and MethodsResults and DiscussionReferences |
|---|
- Shah N, Nicoll J, Nagar B, Gorre M, Paquette R, Kuriyan J, et al. Multiple BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations confer polyclonal resistance to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib (STI571) in chronic phase and blast crisis chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer Cell 2002;2:117.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Hochhaus A, Kreil S, Corbin AS, La Rosée P, Muller MC, Lahaye T, et al. Molecular and chromosomal mechanisms of resistance to imatinib (STI571) therapy. Leukemia 2002;16:2190-6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- le Coutre P, Tassi E, Varella-Garcia M, Barni R, Mologni L, Cabrita G, et al. Induction of resistance to the Abelson inhibitor STI571 in human leukemic cells through gene amplification. Blood 2000;95:1758-1766.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Barnes DJ, Palaiologou D, Panousopoulou E, Schultheis B, Yong AS, Wong A, et al. Bcr-Abl expression levels determine the rate of development of resistance to imatinib mesylate in chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer Res 2005;65:8912-9.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - La Rosée P, Johnson K, Corbin AS, Stoffregen EP, Moseson EM, Willis S, et al. In vitro efficacy of combined treatment depends on the underlying mechanism of resistance in imatinib-resistant Bcr-Abl-positive cell lines. Blood 2004;103:208-15.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Perkins C, Kim CN, Fang G, Bhalla KN. Arsenic induces apoptosis of multidrug-resistant human myeloid leukemia cells that express Bcr-Abl or overexpress MDR, MRP, Bcl-2, or Bcl-x(L). Blood 2000;95:1014-22.[Medline]
- Nimmanapalli R, Bali P, O'Bryan E, Fuino L, Guo F, Wu J, et al. Arsenic trioxide inhibits translation of mRNA of bcr-abl, resulting in attenuation of Bcr-Abl levels and apoptosis of human leukemia cells. Cancer Res 2003;63:7950-8.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Dai J, Weinberg RS, Waxman S, Jing Y. Malignant cells can be sensitized to undergo growth inhibition and apoptosis by arsenic trioxide through modulation of the glutathione redox system. Blood 1999;93:268-77.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Bachleitner-Hofmann T, Gisslinger B, Grumbeck E, Gisslinger H. Arsenic trioxide and ascorbic acid: synergy with potential implications for the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia? Br J Haematol 2001;112:783-6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Meister A. Glutathione metabolism and its selective modification. J Biol Chem 1988;263:17205-8.
[Free Full Text] - Mahon FX, Deininger MW, Schultheis B, Chabrol J, Reiffers J, Goldman JM, et al. Selection and characterization of BCR-ABL positive cell lines with differential sensitivity to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571: diverse mechanisms of resistance. Blood 2000;96:1070-9.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Bailey HH. L-S,R-buthionine sulfoximine: historical development and clinical issues. Chem Biol Interact 1998;111–112:239-54.
- La Rosee P, Johnson K, O'Dwyer ME, Druker BJ. In vitro studies of the combination of imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) and arsenic trioxide (Trisenox) in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Exp Hematol 2002;30:729-37.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Shen ZX, Chen GQ, Ni JH, Li XS, Xiong SM, Qiu QY, et al. Use of arsenic trioxide (As2O3) in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL): II. Clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics in relapsed patients. Blood 1997;89:3354-60.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Davison K, Cote S, Mader S, Miller WH. Glutathione depletion overcomes resistance to arsenic trioxide in arsenic-resistant cell lines. Leukemia 2003;17:931-40.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Gorre ME, Mohammed M, Ellwood K, Hsu N, Paquette R, Rao PN, et al. Clinical resistance to STI-571 cancer therapy caused by BCR-ABL gene mutation or amplification. Science 2001;293:876-80.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Keeshan K, Mills KI, Cotter TG, McKenna SL. Elevated Bcr-Abl expression levels are sufficient for a haematopoietic cell line to acquire a drug-resistant phenotype. Leukemia 2001;15:1823-33.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Hochhaus A, La Rosée P. Imatinib therapy in chronic myelogenous leukemia: strategies to avoid and overcome resistance. Leukemia 2004;18:1321-31.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Copland M, Hamilton A, Elrick LJ, Baird JW, Allan EK, Jordanides N, et al. Dasatinib (BMS-354825) targets an earlier progenitor population than imatinib in primary CML but does not eliminate the quiescent fraction. Blood 2006;107:4532-9.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Holtz MS, Forman SJ, Bhatia R. Non-proliferating CML CD34+ progenitors are resistant to apoptosis induced by a wide range of proapoptotic stimuli. Leukemia 2005;19:1034-41.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Hedley DW, McCulloch EA, Minden MD, Chow S, Curtis J. Antileukemic action of buthionine sulfoximine: evidence for an intrinsic death mechanism based on oxidative stress. Leukemia 1998;12:1545-52.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||