Haematologica, Vol 92, Issue 7, 970-973 doi:10.3324/haematol.11172
Copyright © 2007 by Ferrata Storti Foundation
Martin C. Müller ,
Giuseppe Saglio ,
Feng Lin ,
Heike Pfeifer ,
Richard D. Press ,
Raymond R. Tubbs ,
Peter Paschka ,
Enrico Gottardi ,
Steven G. O’Brien ,
Oliver G. Ottmann ,
Hubertus Stockinger ,
Lothar Wieczorek ,
Kirsten Merx ,
Heiko König ,
Uwe Schwindel ,
Rüdiger Hehlmann ,
Andreas Hochhaus
Due to the lack of comparability of BCR-ABL mRNA quantification results generated by various methodologies in different laboratories, an international multicenter trial was started with the participation of six laboratories (platforms: LightCyclerTM, LC, n=3; TaqManTM, TM, n=3). One hundred and eighty-six PB samples derived from healthy donors were spiked with serial dilutions (1:20 to 1:2x106) of b2a2, b3a2 or e1a2 BCR-ABL positive white blood cells (WBC) from leukemic patients. After PAXgeneTM stabilization, blinding, freezing and distribution, standardized RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, PCR protocols and data evaluation were carried out. There was no significant difference in the results achieved using LC and TM technologies, but a considerable overall variation (CV=0.74 for ratios BCR-ABL/ABL). Up to a dilution of 1:1,000, 27/30 of the 2.5 mL samples tested positive. For higher dilutions, a PB volume of 5 or 10 ml was required to improve sensitivity. The study showed the feasibility of RQ-PCR standardization independent of the PCR machine used.
Patients and healthy controls
PB samples of two CML patients (67 year old male, b2a2=e13a2BCR-ABL transcript positive; 62 year old female, b3a2=e14a2BCR-ABL transcript positive) and one patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, 28 year old male, e1a2BCR-ABL transcript positive) with high tumor load (100% Ph positive metaphases in cytogenetics) were used for PB spiking from healthy donors (two male donors, age 29 and 30 years) after informed consent was obtained.
RNA extraction
After thawing, samples were incubated for two hours at room temperature and RNA extraction was performed in all laboratories following the protocol of the PAXgene Blood RNA KitTM. The concentrations of RNA eluates obtained from 2.5 ml PB (40 µL) were directly assessed photometrically and introduced to cDNA synthesis. Pooling of samples (5 and 10 ml PB) required ethanol precipitation following standard protocols.
Efficiency of RNA extraction
After extraction, RNA concentration was measured by UV spectrophotometry using 5 µL out of 40 µL each. B2a2BCR-ABL samples showed median RNA concentrations of 136 µg/mL (n=48), 161 µg/mL (n=24), and 360 µg/mL (n=24) using one tube (2.5 mL PB), two tubes (5 ml PB), and four tubes (10 mL PB) respectively. B3a2BCR-ABL samples revealed 128 µg/mL (n=24) and 490 µg/mL (n=24) after RNA extraction of one or four tubes respectively. Median RNA concentrations in e1a2 samples were 110 µg/mL (n=24) and 531 µg/mL (n=18) using one or four tubes respectively. For all transcript types, four tube extraction revealed significantly higher RNA concentrations compared to one tube extraction (p<0.0001).
Authors’ Contributions
Copyright © 2007 by Ferrata Storti Foundation
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia |
An international study to standardize the detection and quantitation of BCR-ABL transcripts from stabilized peripheral blood preparations by quantitative RT-PCR
From the III. Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany (MM, PP, KM, HK, US, RH, AH); Azienda Ospedaliera S. Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Italy (GS, EG); School of Clinical and Laboratory Sciences, University of Newcastle, UK (FL); II. Medizinische Klinik, Universität Frankfurt, Germany (HP, OGO); Dept. of Pathology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland OR, USA (RDP); Dept. of Clinical Pathology, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA (RRT); Roche Diagnostics, Penzberg, Germany (HS)
Correspondence: Martin C. Müller, III. Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Wiesbadener Str. 7-11, 68305 Mannheim, Germany. E-mail: mueller{at}uni-hd.de
ABSTRACT
 TOP ABSTRACT Design and MethodsResults and DiscussionReferences |
|---|
Due to the lack of comparability of BCR-ABL mRNA quantification results generated by various methodologies in different laboratories, an international multicenter trial was started with the participation of six laboratories (platforms: LightCyclerTM, LC, n=3; TaqManTM, TM, n=3). One hundred and eighty-six PB samples derived from healthy donors were spiked with serial dilutions (1:20 to 1:2x106) of b2a2, b3a2 or e1a2 BCR-ABL positive white blood cells (WBC) from leukemic patients. After PAXgeneTM stabilization, blinding, freezing and distribution, standardized RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, PCR protocols and data evaluation were carried out. There was no significant difference in the results achieved using LC and TM technologies, but a considerable overall variation (CV=0.74 for ratios BCR-ABL/ABL). Up to a dilution of 1:1,000, 27/30 of the 2.5 mL samples tested positive. For higher dilutions, a PB volume of 5 or 10 ml was required to improve sensitivity. The study showed the feasibility of RQ-PCR standardization independent of the PCR machine used.
Key words: standardization, quantitative PCR, BCR-ABL, chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Molecular monitoring by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) is a valuable technique in many fields of medicine. In contrast to microbiologic applications, such as the quantification of human immunodeficiency virus load,1 there is a lack of standardized procedures and reference materials in leukemia surveillance. Because of the wide range of techniques used, it is difficult to compare results obtained from different laboratories. The most important variables between sample collection and final result are: (i) different volumes and cell counts of peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) samples, different cell separation protocols such as the FicollTM procedure or red cell lysis; (ii) various transit times from blood collection until processing (with time-dependent RNA degradation);2 (iii) different RNA extraction methods such as cesium chloride (CsCl) ultra centrifugation for high volumes of PB versus silica membrane based methods like the RNeasy MiniTM kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and PAXgeneTM (PreAnalytiX, Hombrechtikon, Switzerland) with lower input capacity; (iv) heterogeneity of protocols for cDNA synthesis using specific or random hexamer priming and various RT enzymes; (v) different detection instrument platforms, e.g. TaqMan with hydrolysis probes, and LightCycler with hybridization probes; (vi) the use of different reference genes to compare BCR-ABL ratios to an internal control gene; (vii) different comparators for quantification, e.g. the comparison with serial plasmid dilutions or, alternatively, the use of an RNA calibrator as reference point for both target and reference genes. There are two ways to overcome the lack of comparability: a rigorous standardization of procedures or external calibration of results obtained with different methodologies. The first such standardization method has been applied in this trial, and the latter has been proposed by Hughes et al.3 The focus of this study is on quantification of BCR-ABL mRNA transcripts. These levels have been shown to be a reliable surrogate parameter for progression free survival after treatment with interferon 
or imatinib and after allogeneic stem cell transplantation4–8 in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). An international multicenter trial involving six laboratories from the United States of America (n=2), the United Kingdom (n=1), Italy (n=1), and Germany (n=2) was started with the aim of comparing results using a common procedure on two different platforms (LC and TM). We aimed to (i) demonstrate the feasibility of standardizing procedures; (ii) compare qualitative and quantitative MRD results from different platforms; (iii) determine the optimal PB volume for the clinically relevant detection of low tumor burden, and (iv) to confirm the applicability of total ABL and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) as reference genes to calculate relative response levels.
Design and Methods
|
TOPABSTRACTDesign and MethodsResults and DiscussionReferences |
|---|
Patients and healthy controls
PB samples of two CML patients (67 year old male, b2a2=e13a2BCR-ABL transcript positive; 62 year old female, b3a2=e14a2BCR-ABL transcript positive) and one patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, 28 year old male, e1a2BCR-ABL transcript positive) with high tumor load (100% Ph positive metaphases in cytogenetics) were used for PB spiking from healthy donors (two male donors, age 29 and 30 years) after informed consent was obtained.
Sample preparation
PB samples of BCR-ABL positive patients were incubated with NH4Cl solution to lyse red blood cells and washed in phosphate buffered saline. After manually counting the white blood cell (WBC) stock solutions with leukocyte concentrations corresponding to the healthy donors, WBC counts were prepared for each BCR-ABL transcript type. A total of 1,020 mL freshly drawn healthy donors’ PB was used for the preparation of serial dilutions (1:20 to 1:2x106) using b2a2, b3a2 and e1a2 BCR-ABL positive WBC within three hours after phlebotomy. After including 108 negative controls without the addition of BCR-ABL positive cells, a total of 408 aliquots of 2.5 ml were injected into PAXgeneTM tubes containing stabilizing agent, blinded and frozen at –20°C until shipment to the participating laboratories. Multiple samples of the same dilutions were prepared to compare sensitivity when using low (2.5 mL, one tube), intermediate (5 mL, two tubes), or high volume (10 mL, four tubes) PB (Table 1).
|
View this table: [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Table 1. Results of BCR-ABL/ABL and BCR-ABL/G6PD ratios separated by transcript type and dilution (d.l.: detection limit, representing samples being tested BCR-ABL positive only by a minority of laboratories).
|
After thawing, samples were incubated for two hours at room temperature and RNA extraction was performed in all laboratories following the protocol of the PAXgene Blood RNA KitTM. The concentrations of RNA eluates obtained from 2.5 ml PB (40 µL) were directly assessed photometrically and introduced to cDNA synthesis. Pooling of samples (5 and 10 ml PB) required ethanol precipitation following standard protocols.
cDNA synthesis
RNA (35 µL, corresponding to a median amount of 4.5 µg in samples derived from one tube, 5.6 µg in samples derived from two tubes, and 15.3 µg in samples derived from four tubes) was transcribed into cDNA following a LightCycler t(9;22) Quantification KitTM (Roche) protocol using random hexamer priming and AMV reverse transcriptase.
Quantitative real time RT-PCR on LightCycler platforms
In all samples (n=186; n=31 per center), quantitative real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) for BCR-ABL, total ABL, and G6PD mRNA transcripts were performed in duplicates (186 sample PCR reactions and 96 control PCR reactions) using a modified LightCycler t(9;22) Quantification KitTM and the LightCycler 1.0 apparatus (Roche). cDNA calibrator served as positive control for BCR-ABL, total ABL, and G6PD. This version of the Roche kit was supplemented by an ABL detection mix to compare ABL and G6PD within this study. PCR conditions conformed to the kit protocol.
Quantitative real time RT-PCR on TaqMan platforms
Primers, probes and PCR conditions employed on TaqMan platforms (ABI PRISMTM 7700) were used according to the Europe Against Cancer (EAC) protocol.9 All samples (n=31) were examined in duplicates for BCR-ABL, total ABL, and G6PD (186 sample PCR reactions and 54 control PCR reactions).
Calculation of the results
Roche Relative Quantification SoftwareTM10 was used centrally to determine BCR-ABL, total ABL, and G6PD transcript concentrations and to calculate the BCR-ABL/total ABL and BCR-ABL/G6PD ratios. The coefficient files, reflecting the amplification characteristics of the RNA calibrator provided with the Roche t(9;22) kit which might change from lot to lot, were taken for evaluating the LightCycler data. Coefficient files of the TaqMan data were calculated using TaqMan PCR for BCR-ABL, total ABL, and G6PD of dilution series of the calibrator RNA of the kit. Each BCR-ABL/control gene ratio was calculated from the mean of duplicate measurements of BCR-ABL and control genes.
Statistical methods
Correlation coefficients were calculated according to Spearman’s rank test. Comparison of molecular results and RNA yields were performed using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests. All tests were calculated using the GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
Results and Discussion
|
TOPABSTRACTDesign and MethodsResults and DiscussionReferences |
|---|
Efficiency of RNA extraction
After extraction, RNA concentration was measured by UV spectrophotometry using 5 µL out of 40 µL each. B2a2BCR-ABL samples showed median RNA concentrations of 136 µg/mL (n=48), 161 µg/mL (n=24), and 360 µg/mL (n=24) using one tube (2.5 mL PB), two tubes (5 ml PB), and four tubes (10 mL PB) respectively. B3a2BCR-ABL samples revealed 128 µg/mL (n=24) and 490 µg/mL (n=24) after RNA extraction of one or four tubes respectively. Median RNA concentrations in e1a2 samples were 110 µg/mL (n=24) and 531 µg/mL (n=18) using one or four tubes respectively. For all transcript types, four tube extraction revealed significantly higher RNA concentrations compared to one tube extraction (p<0.0001).
Correlation of BCR-ABL/ABL and BCR-ABL/G6PD ratios
After decoding and evaluating the raw data there was an excellent correlation between the BCR-ABL/ABL and BCR-ABL/G6PD ratios (r=0.96, p<0.0001, Figure 1A, online supplement) independent of the platform used. This agrees with previously reported clinical data.11–13
Correlation of BCR-ABL ratios in LC vs TM platforms
BCR-ABL/ABL and BCR-ABL/G6PD ratios correlated well comparing LC results with TM results (n=53, r=0.85, p<0.0001, Figure 1B, online supplement). and r=0.82, p<0.0001, respectively). Overall, mean TM ratios were approximately three times higher than LC ratios (p<0.0001) when using ABL and showed no difference when using G6PD as housekeeping gene (p=0.25). Differences in the amplification efficiency of target and control genes may be the reason for this. The introduction of laboratory-specific conversion factors adopted for an external calibrator could provide a solution.
BCR-ABL/ABL ratios: individual results of six laboratories
Individual results from six participating laboratories are shown in Figure 2A (online supplement) (b2a2BCR-ABL), Figure 2B online supplement) (b3a2BCR-ABL), and Figure 2C online supplement) (e1a2BCR-ABL). Samples with low BCR-ABL burden showed a wider variation of results with inconsistent detection of BCR-ABL. The coefficients of variation (CV) for samples tested positive were comparable for BCR-ABL/ABL (CV=0.74) and BCR-ABL/G6PD ratios (CV=0.76). There is a linear relationship between the grade of dilution of the samples and the BCR-ABL/ABL ratios (r2=0.9831, 0.9888 and 0.9909 for b2a2, b3a2 and e1a2 dilutions respectively).
Sensitivity and specificity
BCR-ABL was detected in 100 out of 138 positive samples evaluating BCR-ABL relative to ABL (72.5%) and in 96 out of 138 relative to G6PD (69.6%). None of the laboratories revealed the presence of BCR-ABL in the 48 blinded negative controls, indicating a 100% specificity. Overall sensitivity is difficult to interpret since patient tumor load clearly differed (median BCR-ABL/ABL ratio of the 1:20 dilutions were 0.73, 0.31 and 0.088 in b2a2, b3a2 and e1a2 samples respectively). Up to a dilution of 1:1,000, 27 out of 30 (90%) 2.5 mL samples tested positive. Two of the 3 failures derived from the 1:1,000 dilution of e1a2 samples containing lower BCR-ABL copy numbers than the respective b2a2 or b3a2 dilutions. For higher dilutions (1:10,000 to 1:2,000,000), an initial PB volume of 5 or 10 mL (2 tubes or 4 tubes) partly showed improved sensitivity (Figure 2A, online supplement).
We conclude that (i) standardization of quantitative PCR is feasible independent of the PCR machine used; (ii) test sensitivity depends on the volume of PB used. To detect a three-log reduction of the tumor load on a cellular basis (the clinical treatment target that best predicts optimal long-term survival), 2.5 mL PB seems to be sufficient in most cases. Higher sensitivities may be achieved using 10 mL PB; (iii) both total ABL and G6PD can be used as control genes. The comparability of RQ-PCR data does not depend on the use of identical platforms but on a common procedure to calculate results. External standards may help to control the differences in performance between laboratories.3 International agreements on the use of a limited number of PCR protocols optimized for each platform are needed. The implementation of international control and calibrator materials, and the prospective use of these protocols within clinical trials would be advisable.
Footnotes
Authors’ Contributions
MM, GS, LF: performed sample preparation, logistics, data evaluation, writing of the paper; HP: performed sample testing, contributed to writing of the paper; RP: performed sample testing, contributed to writing of the paper; RT: performed sample testing, contributed to writing of the pape; PP: sample preparation, logistics, performed sample testing, contributed to writing of the paper; EG: performed sample testing, contributed to writing of the paper; SB: logistics, contributed to writing of the paper; OO: logistics, contributed to writing of the paper; HS: logistics, contributed to writing of the paper; LW: logistics, contributed to writing of the paper; KM: performed sample testing, contributed to writing of the paper; HK: sample preparation, logistics, contributed to writing of the paper; US: sample preparation, contributed to writing of the paper; RH: contributed to writing of the paper; AH: logistics, writing of the paper.
The author reported no potential conflicts of interest.
Funding: the study was supported by Novartis Pharma, Nürnberg, Germany; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany; the Competence Network ‘Acute and chronic leukemias’, sponsored by the German Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Projektträger Gesundheitsforschung; DLR e.V.-01 GI9980/6), and the European LeukemiaNet within the 6th European Community Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development.
Received for publication December 17, 2006. Accepted for publication April 16, 2007.
References
|
TOPABSTRACTDesign and MethodsResults and DiscussionReferences |
|---|
- Lin HJ, Haywood M, Hollinger FB. Application of a commercial kit for detection of PCR products to quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA and proviral DNA. J Clin Microbiol 1996;34:329-33.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Müller MC, Merx K, Weisser A, Kreil S, Lahaye T, Hehlmann R, et al. Improvement of molecular monitoring of residual disease in leukemias by bedside RNA stabilization. Leukemia 2002;16:2395-9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Hughes TP, Kaeda J, Branford S, Rudzki Z, Hochhaus A, Hensley ML, et al. Monitoring CML patients responding to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors - Review and recommendations for ‘harmonizing’ current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts and kinase domain mutations and for expressing results. International Randomised Study of Interferon versus STI571 (IRIS) Study Group. Blood 2006.
- Cross NC, Feng L, Chase A, Bungey J, Hughes TP, Goldman JM. Competitive polymerase chain reaction to estimate the number of BCR-ABL transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia patients after bone marrow transplantation. Blood 1993;82:1929-36.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Hochhaus A, Reiter A, Saussele S, Reichert A, Emig M, Kaeda J, et al. Molecular heterogeneity in complete cytogenetic responders after interferon-a therapy for chronic myelogenous leukemia: low levels of minimal residual disease are associated with continuing remission. German CML Study Group and the UK MRC CML Study Group. Blood 2000;95:62-6.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Hughes TP, Kaeda J, Branford S, Rudzki Z, Hochhaus A, Hensley ML, et al. Frequency of major molecular responses to imatinib or interferon alfa plus cytarabine in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1423-32.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Müller MC, Gattermann N, Lahaye T, Deininger MW, Berndt A, Fruehauf S, et al. Dynamics of BCR-ABL mRNA expression in first-line therapy of chronic myelogenous leukemia patients with imatinib or interferon a/ara-C. Leukemia 2003;17:2392-400.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Cortes J, Talpaz M, O’Brien S, Jones D, Luthra R, Shan J, et al. Molecular responses in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase treated with imatinib mesylate. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:3425-32.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Gabert J, Beillard E, van dV, Bi W, Grimwade D, Pallisgaard N, et al. Standardization and quality control studies of ‘real-time’ quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction of fusion gene transcripts for residual disease detection in leukemia - a Europe Against Cancer program. Leukemia 2003;17:2318-57.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Eleaume H, Jabbouri S. Comparison of two standardisation methods in real-time quantitative RT-PCR to follow Staphylococcus aureus genes expression during in vitro growth. J Microbiol Methods 2004;59:363-70.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Hochhaus A, Lin F, Reiter A, Skladny H, Mason PJ, van Rhee F, et al. Quantification of residual disease in chronic myelogenous leukemia patients on interferon-alpha therapy by competitive polymerase chain reaction. Blood 1996;87:1549-55.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Paschka P, Müller MC, Merx K, Kreil S, Schoch C, Lahaye T, et al. Molecular monitoring of response to imatinib (Glivec((R)) in CML patients pretreated with interferon alpha. Low levels of residual disease are associated with continuous remission. Leukemia 2003;17:1687-94.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Merx K, Müller MC, Kreil S, Lahaye T, Paschka P, Schoch C, et al. Early reduction of BCR-ABL mRNA transcript levels predicts cytogenetic response in chronic phase CML patients treated with imatinib after failure of interferon alpha. Leukemia 2002;16:1579-83.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  G. Rosti, F. Palandri, F. Castagnetti, M. Breccia, L. Levato, G. Gugliotta, A. Capucci, M. Cedrone, C. Fava, T. Intermesoli, et al. Nilotinib for the frontline treatment of Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia Blood, December 3, 2009; 114(24): 4933 - 4938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. H. Kim, L. Sriharsha, W. Xu, S. Kamel-Reid, X. Liu, K. Siminovitch, H. A. Messner, and J. H. Lipton Clinical Relevance of a Pharmacogenetic Approach Using Multiple Candidate Genes to Predict Response and Resistance to Imatinib Therapy in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2009; 15(14): 4750 - 4758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Baccarani, G. Rosti, F. Castagnetti, I. Haznedaroglu, K. Porkka, E. Abruzzese, G. Alimena, H. Ehrencrona, H. Hjorth-Hansen, V. Kairisto, et al. Comparison of imatinib 400 mg and 800 mg daily in the front-line treatment of high-risk, Philadelphia-positive chronic myeloid leukemia: a European LeukemiaNet Study Blood, May 7, 2009; 113(19): 4497 - 4504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Baccarani, F. Pane, and G. Saglio Monitoring treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia Haematologica, February 1, 2008; 93(2): 161 - 169. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||