|
|
|||||||
Original Articles |
1 University Childrens Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
2 Childrens Hospital, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Hannover, Germany
3 Childrens Hospital, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
4 Robert-Rossle-Clinic, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch and
5 University Childrens Hospital, Giessen, Germany
Correspondence: Felix Niggli, MD, University Childrens Hospital Zurich, Steinwiesstrasse 75 Zurich, 8032 Switzerland., E-mail:felix.niggli{at}kispi.uzh.ch
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design and Methods: In a cohort of 1162 patients with childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia we analyzed whether there was a correlation between degree of anemia and leukemia subtype. We also studied the association between degree of anemia and event-free survival within the subtypes.
Results: Hemoglobin levels at diagnosis were distributed in a non-random pattern. The degree of anemia was significantly different for three distinct groups of patients compared to the remaining patients (mean hemoglobin; T-cell leukemia: 106 g/L versus 76 g/L (precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia); within precursor B-cell ALL: TEL-AML1 positive: 68 g/L versus 79 g/L; BCR-ABL positive: 93 g/L versus 76 g/L; each p<0.05). Furthermore, in contrast to the entire study group, patients with T-cell leukemia, TEL-AML1+, and BCR-ABL+ precursor B-cell leukemia had a more favorable prognosis if presenting with a higher hemoglobin level (
80 g/L).
Conclusions: These observations indicate that the formerly reported direct correlation between severity of anemia and survival in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia mainly reflects differences in the degree of anemia between distinct biological subgroups with different treatment outcomes. On the other hand, the inverse relationship between severity of anemia and survival found within specific subgroups suggests that very low hemoglobin levels at diagnosis are associated with more advanced disease in these subgroups.
Key words: childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, anemia, myeloid suppression, TEL-AML1.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The pathomechanism of anemia in childhood ALL is not completely understood. Anemia in children with cancer is associated with decreased erythropoietic activity but not with inadequate erythropoietin production, leading to the assumption that anemia in patients with leukemia mainly results from suppression of normal hematopoiesis in the bone marrow by infiltrating blasts.5,6
To further understand the pathophysiology of anemia in childhood ALL, it is important to consider the heterogeneity of diseases in these patients, including immunological subgroups (precursor B-cell ALL versus T-cell leukemia) and cytogenetic subgroups (e.g. TEL-AML1, E2A-PBX1, BCR-ABL, hyperdiploid karyotype with >50 chromosomes, and MLL gene rearrangements).
The differences in clinical features at presentation between patients with T-cell leukemia and precursor B-cell ALL are well recognized and include higher Hb levels in patients with T-cell leukemia.7–9 However, the prognostic influence of the initial Hb level in T-cell leukemia is controversial. In some studies, a higher Hb level was associated with a worse prognosis.10,11 In other series, there was no association, or even an opposite association.12,13 The Hb level at diagnosis is apparently not suitable for application in risk stratification strategies in current clinical trials.14
Precursor B-cell ALL is a heterogeneous disease comprising several distinct biological subtypes that are associated with different outcomes. Patients with t(1;19) leading to a E2A-PBX1 gene fusion, hyperdiploidy involving more than 50 chromosomes, or TEL-AML1 gene fusion have a favorable outcome, whereas those with t(4;11) leading to a MLL-AF4 gene fusion and a t(9;22) leading to a BCR-ABL gene fusion have a dismal prognosis.15 Despite the accurate analysis of the incidence and clinical relevance of these subtypes, it has not been reported whether there is any relationship between cytogenetic subtypes and degree of anemia.16–21
In the present study, we evaluated whether there is a correlation between degree of anemia and leukemia subtype. Furthermore, we studied the association between degree of anemia and event-free survival (EFS) within these subtypes of leukemia.
| Design and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 or Fishers exact test. Survival probabilities were calculated using the Kaplan and Meier method with differences compared by the log-rank test; standard error were calculated according to Greenwood.23–25 The probability of EFS (pEFS) was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the first event (death from any cause, tumor progression/relapse or non-response, or second malignancy) or to the date of last follow-up. The prognostic impact of anemia on treatment outcome was analyzed together with other known prognostic factors using Cox regression analysis.26 Statistical analyses were performed using the SAS program (SAS-PC, version 9.1, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.). The patients follow-up data were updated as of October 2005. | Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
80 g/L) had an increased risk of poor outcome compared to patients with lower Hb levels (Hb <80 g/L) (pEFS: 0.76 versus 0.8, log-rank p=0.05).
|
100x109/L) was found (Table 2A). There was no association between degree of anemia and age among patients with T-cell leukemia (Table 2B).
|
100x109/L) which was, however, only statistically significant in the TEL-AML1+ subgroup (Table 2A). Furthermore, younger age (<10 years) was associated with lower Hb levels at diagnosis in both groups (Table 2B). Patients enrolled in the ALL-BFM 95 trial did not undergo screening for the E2A-PBX1 gene fusion. Therefore, anemia could not be analyzed separately in this subgroup of patients.
The second aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate whether there is an association between Hb level and prognosis within the subgroups. Due to a limited number of patients in the MLL-AF4 group, this evaluation could only be performed for T-cell leukemia, TEL-AML1+, BCR-ABL+, and hyperdiploid karyotype precursor B-cell ALL.
Among children with T-cell leukemia, the Hb level at diagnosis was significantly associated with EFS. Patients presenting with lower Hb levels at diagnosis had an increased risk of poor outcome compared to patients with higher Hb level [(pEFS: 0.77 (Hb
80 g/L, n=114) versus 0.54 (Hb <80 g/L, n=24), p=0.03, and 0.82 (Hb
110 g/L, n=67) versus 0.65 (Hb <110 g/L, n=71), p=0.03)] (Figures 1 and 2). There was a trend for a similar difference in the TEL-AML1+ subgroup. Again, an advantage was observed for patients with higher Hb level as compared to those with lower Hb levels [(pEFS: 0.97 (Hb
80 g/L, n=66) versus 0.89 (Hb <80 g/L, n=175), log-rank p=0.12, 6-year pEFS p=0.01)]. In addition, there was a significant association between anemia and EFS within the BCR-ABL+ subgroup. Treatment failed in all patients who were diagnosed with BCR-ABL rearrangement in combination with lower Hb level at diagnosis [(pEFS: 0.35 (Hb
80 g/L, n=17) versus 0 (Hb <80 g/L, n=8), p=0.02)]. No substantial association was found between Hb level and prognosis for hyperdiploid karyotype leukemias [(pEFS: 0.85 (Hb
80 g/L, n=74) versus 0.88 (Hb <80 g/L, n=86), log-rank p=0.52, 6-year pEFS p=0.51)].
|
|
80 g/L) and leukocyte count (
100x109/L) at diagnosis, age (
10 years), and prednisone response (the presence of
1,000 blasts per microliter of peripheral blood at day 8 was defined as a prednisone poor response). Due to the limited number of patients, no Cox model was constructed for the BCR-ABL group. In T-cell leukemia, only a prednisone poor response was an independent prognostic factor (RR=5.74, 95%CI 2.62–11.44, p<0.001). All data including those for Hb, leukocytes, and age are presented in Table 3A. Applying the Cox model to the TEL-AML1 subgroup, no independent risk factor could be identified (Table 3B). Thus, when adjusted for other risk factors, Hb is not an independent risk factor.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
80g/L). However, the observed difference was only moderate and did not take into consideration the heterogeneity of childhood ALL. Until now, no studies evaluated a possible correlation between degree of anemia and leukemia subtype. Our study demonstrates that Hb levels at diagnosis are distributed in a non-random pattern in childhood ALL. As expected, patients with T-cell leukemia presented with significanty higher Hb levels at diagnosis than did patients with precursor B-cell ALL. Although the basis for this difference is not well understood, it is likely that biological regulation of bone marrow infiltration, cell clone proliferation, and circulating peripheral blasts substantially differentiate T-cell leukemia from precursor B-cell ALL. In addition to the difference in the Hb level between T-lineage ALL and precursor B-cell leukemias, we also found a statistically significant difference in Hb level between both BCR-ABL+ and TEL-AML1+ ALL and precursor B-cell ALL without these fusions. Several studies have analyzed the clinical and biological features in ALL patients carrying the translocation t(12;21) leading to the TEL-AML1 gene fusion.27–38 None of those studies reported a low Hb level to be associated with TEL-AML1. One study addressed this issue, but failed to demonstrate a correlation between Hb and TEL-AML1, probably due to the limited number of patients analyzed (11/51 patients TEL-AML1+).39 However, a possible association between lower Hb levels at diagnosis and the TEL-AML1 subtype were observed for the first time recently by a group from China.40 The analysis of 95 pediatric ALL patients including 20 TEL-AML1+ cases revealed a significantly lower Hb level in the TEL-AML1+ patients than in the other patients (61 g/L versus 76 g/L; p=0.003). Their findings have now been confirmed by our data. We add significant information having evaluated a much larger group of patients and having conducted a comprehensive subgroup analysis.
Our data strongly suggest that there is a correlation between leukemia subtype and the degree of anemia indicating distinct mechanisms in the formation of erythropoietic insufficiency. Lower Hb levels (Hb <80 g/L) were more often diagnosed in leukemia subtypes associated with a favorable outcome (TEL-AML1+, hyperdiploid karyotype). In contrast, more aggressive leukemia subtypes (T-cell leukemia and BCR-ABL+ precursor B-cell leukemia) were associated with higher Hb levels (Hb
80 g/L).22 We suppose that the correlation between degree of anemia and survival is due to the correlation between degree of anemia and the distinct biological subgroups that are associated with different outcomes.
Evaluating the TEL-AML1+ subgroup, anemia was more pronounced among younger patients (<10 years). There was a trend for a similar difference in the BCR-ABL+ subgroup. It is possible that lower baseline Hb levels in the younger population before developing leukemia might contribute to this finding; however, an additional impact of other biological factors cannot be excluded. Patients carrying the TEL-AML1 translocation are overrepresented in the younger age group (<10 years). We think it is rather unlikely that lower baseline Hb levels before developing leukemia exclusively contributes to the strong association of TEL-AML1 and severe anemia (Hb <80 g/L). This assumption is based upon the observation that the mean Hb level was lower in the TEL-AML1 subgroup than in the other subgroups in older patients (>10 years).
As regards the predictive power of Hb level in subgroups, the literature data on the prognostic influence of Hb in T-cell leukemia are controversial.10–13 Based on our data, higher Hb levels in this group of patients were clearly associated with better outcome compared to lower Hb levels. We observed a similar trend in the TEL-AML1+ subgroup. Due to an unusual late relapse, there was no overall significance in this group using the log-rank test, however, EFS at 6 years was significantly different between the two groups. Despite a limited number of patients (n=25), estimation of EFS revealed striking differences within the subgroup of BCR-ABL+ precursor B-cell leukemia. Again, a low Hb level at diagnosis was an adverse prognostic marker. Despite the reported (univariate) association between anemia and EFS within the mentioned subgroups, the Hb level at diagnosis was not an independent risk factor and, therefore, of negligible value for risk assignment. The predictive power of treatment response was much stronger than that of the initial Hb level.
To summarize, initial degree of anemia in childhood ALL is non-randomly distributed. Moreover, in contrast to the group of patients considered as a whole, patients with T-cell leukemia, TEL-AML1+, and BCR-ABL+ precursor B-cell leukemia have a more favorable prognosis if presenting with higher Hb levels. Given that it was observed in several series that a higher Hb level is associated with poorer outcome, it was assumed that this reflects conditions with a high proliferation rate of an aggressive leukemic cell clone (shorter history in fast disease).41,42 Based on our data, this hypothesis is not sustainable for (at least) the three ALL subtypes mentioned above. This is further supported by the observation that hyperleukocytosis was associated with lower Hb levels. We suggest that lower Hb levels or severe anemia at diagnosis might correspond to conditions of advanced disease. It is possible that patients presenting with higher Hb levels or mild anemia are detected at an early stage of disease, and are, therefore, more susceptible to chemotherapeutic interventions.
| Footnotes |
|---|
OT: prepared the study, collected data, and wrote the manuscript; MS: designed the study, and contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data and to writing the manuscript; GC, WDL: collected and analyzed data; SL: collected data and contributed to writing manuscript; BWS: analyzed and interpreted data and contributed to writing manuscript; MZ: analyzed data and performed the statistical analyses; MS: collected, analyzed and interpreted the data, designed the study and wrote manuscript; FKN: collected and interpreted data, designed the study and wrote the manuscript.
The authors reported no potential conflicts of interest.
Received for publication April 1, 2008. Revision received July 18, 2008. Accepted for publication July 21, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | TABLE OF CONTENTS | ARCHIVE | SUBSCRIPTIONS |