Published online 6 October 2008
Haematologica, Vol 93, Issue 12, 1837-1842 doi:10.3324/haematol.13273
Copyright © 2008 by Ferrata Storti Foundation

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jantunen, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jantunen, E.

Malignant Lymphomas

Autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly patients (60 years) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: an analysis based on data in the European Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry

Esa Jantunen¹, Carmen Canals², Alessandro Rambaldi³, Gert Ossenkoppele⁴, Bernardino Allione⁵, Didier Blaise⁶, Eulogio Conde⁷, Hervè Tilly⁸, Gordon Cook⁹, Fiona Clark¹⁰, Andrea Gallamini¹¹, Andrew Haynes¹², Nicolas Mounier¹³, Peter Dreger¹⁴, Michael Pfreundschuh¹⁵, Anna Sureda¹⁶, for the EBMT Lymphoma Working Party

¹ Department of Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
² Banc de Sang i Teixits, Barcelona, Spain
³ Divisione di Ematologia, Ospedale Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
⁴ Department of Hematology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
⁵ Hematology Department, H SS. Antonio e Biagio, Alessandria, Italy
⁶ Unitè de transplantation et de therapie cellulaire, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France
⁷ Servicio de Hematologia-Hemoterapia, Hospital U. Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
⁸ Hematology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
⁹ Blood and Bone Marrow Transplant Centre, St. James’ University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
¹⁰ Centre for Clinical Haematology, Birmingham, United Kingdom
¹¹ Division of Hematology, Az. Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
¹² Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom
¹³ Service d’Onco-Hématologie, Hopital l'Archet, Nice, France
¹⁴ Medizinische Klinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
¹⁵ Internal Medicine, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany
¹⁶ Clinical Hematology Division, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

Correspondence: Esa Jantunen, MD, PhD, Department of Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O.B. 1777, 70211 Kuopio, Finland. E-mail:esa.jantunen{at}kuh.fi

TOP ABSTRACT Introduction Design and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Background: There is currently limited experience on the feasibility and efficacy of autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Design and Methods: We analyzed the outcome of 2612 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with autologous stem cell transplantation between 2000 and 2005 and reported to the European Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. Four hundred and sixty-three patients (18%) were 60 years old at the time of the transplant (median, 63 years). When compared to 2149 patients <60 years old at the time of transplantation, the elderly patients had more frequently received at least two treatment lines (76% vs. 57%, p<0.001), were less commonly in first complete remission at the time of transplantation (23 % vs. 30 %, p=0.005) and received their transplants later after diagnosis (median time 14 months vs.7.5 months, p<0.001).

Results: Non-relapse mortality was higher in elderly patients at 100 days (4.4 % vs. 2.8 %), at 1 year (8.7% vs. 4.7%) and at 3 years (10.8% vs. 6.5%) (p=0.002). With a median follow-up of 12 months for the surviving patients for the elderly group and 15 months for the younger group, the risk of relapse was 38% and 32%, respectively (p=0.006).The progression-free survival was 51% and 62%, respectively, at 3 years (p<0.001). The overall survival rate was 60% vs. 70%, respectively, at 3 years (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Autologous stem cell transplantation is feasible in selected elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, although non-relapse mortality is somewhat higher than in younger patients. Both progression-free and overall survival rates are promising taking into account the generally poorer outcome of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Key words: autologous stem cell transplantation, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, elderly patients, non-relapse mortality, outcome.

TOP ABSTRACT Introduction Design and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, accounting for 30–40% of all new cases. The median age of the patients at diagnosis is more than 60 years. The proportion of elderly patients is increasing in most societies and consequently the number of DLBCL patients over 60 years of age is also continuously increasing.

Age over 60 years is a poor prognostic factor in the International Prognostic Index. Recent improvements in the management of DLBCL in elderly patients, including addition of rituximab to CHOP¹ and the use of CHOP-14,² have improved outcome in this most common type of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. However, a significant proportion of elderly patients with DLBCL fail to achieve a complete remission or experience a relapse associated with poor outcome.

High-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard of care in patients with relapsed chemosensitive aggressive lymphomas.³ The issue is more controversial in patients receiving ASCT after the first-line treatment. Some studies performed in the pre-rituximab era suggested that ASCT is more beneficial than conventional therapy in patients with high-risk disease^4–6 but most randomized studies have not confirmed these observations.^7–11

Limited data are available on the feasibility and efficacy of ASCT in elderly patients with DLBCL. This is due to the fact that the upper age limit in studies including ASCT has been about 60 years and has only recently been increased to 65 years. A general assumption has been that ASCT is associated with higher toxicity and hence less clinical utility in elderly patients.

Current knowledge on the feasibility and efficacy of ASCT in DLBCL patients 60 years or over is based on several small reports.^12–18 Only four series including at least 20 transplanted DLBCL patients over 60 years of age have been published.^19–22 Although these reports give some hints on early non-relapse mortality and outcome, they are too small to facilitate proper analysis of risk factors for non-relapse mortality or prognostic factors for long-term outcome. Therefore, a retrospective analysis based on data in the European Blood and Marrow Transplant (EBMT) registry was undertaken by the Lymphoma Working Party.

TOP ABSTRACT Introduction Design and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The EBMT is a voluntary organization comprising 525 transplant centers mainly from Europe. Member centers are required to submit minimal essential data (Med-A form) from consecutive patients to a central lymphoma registry in which patients may be identified by subtype of lymphoma and type of transplantation. Participating transplant centers are subject to on-site audits to assess data accuracy and consecutive reporting. Informed consent was obtained locally according to regulations applicable at the time of transplantation. Since January 1, 2003 all EBMT centers have been required to obtain written informed consent prior to data registration following the Helsinki Declaration of 1975.

The EBMT database was used to identify patients with DLBCL aged 18–75 years old treated with a first ASCT between 2000 and 2005. Altogether there were 6758 patients in the registry of whom 1327 (20 %) were 60 years old at the time of transplantation.

Only fully documented transplants with EBMT MED-B forms (www.ebmt.org) were finally included in the present study (n=2612). By multivariate analysis this subgroup of patients was shown to be representative of all reported patients receiving ASCT for DLBCL in the study period.

Patients 60 years old at the time of transplantation (n=463, 18%) were compared with younger patients (n=2149) transplanted during the same period with regards to non-relapse mortality and outcome. The number of patients 60 years with DLBCL reported increased from 172 in year 2000 to 265 in year 2005 (an increase of 54% during the study period). The median age of the elderly group of patients was 63 years (range, 60–74). Within this group of patients 311 (67%) were 60–64 years old, 139 patients (30%) 65–69 years old, and only 13 patients (3%) 70–74 years old at the time of ASCT. The median age of the younger group of patients was 47 years old (range, 18–59).

Patient and transplant characteristics
The characteristics of the patients and transplants of the study population are presented in Table 1. Patients transplanted at the age of 60 years or more less commonly had B-symptoms and bulky disease at the time of diagnosis than had the younger patients. On the other hand, the elderly patients received ASCT later, had more often received at least two treatment lines and were less commonly in first remission at the time of transplantation. The median follow-up for the surviving patients was 14.5 months.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]

Table 1. Patient and transplant characteristics according to age at the time of autologous stem cell transplantation.

Statistical methods
The main goal of this study was to investigate the risk of non-relapse mortality and outcome after ASCT in DLBCL patients 60 years or older, and compare these with the risk of non-relapse mortality and outcome in younger patients, while adjusting for significant patient, disease- and transplant-related variables. All the analyses were executed in the entire patient cohort, considering age at ASCT (<60 years vs. 60 years) the main study variable.

Patient and transplant characteristics were compared between groups using the ² test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and the t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables. The probabilities of progression-free survival were calculated from the time of transplantation using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimate, with the variance estimated by Greenwood’s formula, and compared by the log-rank test. Neutrophil engraftment, non-relapse mortality and relapse or progression after ASCT were calculated using cumulative incidences to account for competing risks, and compared by Cox univariate analysis. Potential prognostic factors for non-relapse mortality were studied in multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazards regression. Some risk factors in the Cox model contained a category for unknown to avoid loss of information. The assumption of proportional hazards for each factor in the Cox model was tested using time-dependent covariates. All variables satisfied the proportionality assumption. All variables were tested for a significant interaction with the main factor under study. All p values were two-sided.

Cumulative incidences were calculated using the NCSS 97 software. All other computations were performed using the SPSS 13.0 statistical package.

TOP ABSTRACT Introduction Design and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Table 1 presents the patients’ and transplant characteristics according to age group.

Hematologic engraftment
No differences were observed in the numbers of CD34⁺ cells infused or in the use of growth factors post-transplantation between the two groups. The number of CD34⁺ cells infused was 5.2x10⁶/kg (range, 0.6–47.2) in younger patients and 5.2x10⁶/kg (range, 1.7–42.1) in patients over 60 years old. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was used in 61% and 62% of the younger and older patients, respectively. Among the elderly patients G-CSF was associated with more rapid neutrophil engraftment (11 days vs. 13 days, p<0.001).

Neutrophil recovery occurred in all but 1.1% of patients (0.9% in younger patients and 1.7% in patients over 60 years of age at ASCT), with a median time to reach an absolute neutrophil count above 0.5x10⁹/L of 11 days in both groups. The cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment was 99% (95% CI: 98.7–99.5) in the younger patients and 98.3% (95% CI:97.1–99.5) in the elderly patients (p=n.s.).

Non-relapse mortality
The rate of non-relapse mortality was higher in the group of elderly patients at all time points analyzed (Figure 1). Non-relapse mortality in the elderly and younger groups was 4.4% vs. 2.8% at 100 days after ASCT, 8.7% vs. 4.7% at 1 year, and 10.8% vs. 6.5% at 3 years, respectively (p=0.002). No differences were observed in non-relapse mortality at 100 days between patients aged 60–64 and those aged 65–69 (4.4% vs. 4.2%). In multivariate analysis four factors were statistically significantly associated with non-relapse mortality: age 60 years (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1.–2.3, p=0.01), two or more lines of therapy prior to ASCT (RR 1.9,95% CI 1.3–2.8, p=0.001), poor performance status at ASCT (RR 3.8, 95% CI 2.2–6.7, p=0.001), and refractory disease at ASCT (RR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1–3.3, p=0.02).

View larger version (10K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]

Figure 1. Non-relapse mortality according to age at the time of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Solid line: patients 60 years old; dotted line: patients <60 years old; p=0.002.

Infections were the main cause of non-relapse mortality among the elderly patients (56%) followed by multiorgan failure (16%), second malignancy (13%), pulmonary toxicity (3%) and cardiac toxicity (3%). Causes of death did not differ between younger and elderly patients except for second malignancy, which was more common in the elderly patients (13% vs. 5%). The risk of developing second malignancy was 2.5% vs. 1.4% at 3 years and 7.5% vs. 2.6% at 5 years, respectively (RR 2.2, 95%CI 1.0–4.7, p=0.05).

Relapse risk
The cumulative risk of relapse at 3 years was 38% in the elderly patients and 32% in the younger patients (p=0.006) (Figure 2). In a multivariate analysis, four factors remained significant for the risk of relapse: no rituximab therapy prior to ASCT (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3–2.0), p<0.001), two or more lines of prior therapy (RR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4–2.0, p=0.001), poor performance status at ASCT (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1.–2.5, p=0.02) and refractory disease at ASCT (RR 2.8, 95% CI 2.1–3.7, p=0.001). On the other hand, in a multivariate analysis, the elderly patients showed only a trend towards a higher relapse risk (RR 1.2, 95% CI 0.9–1.4, p=0.06).

View larger version (10K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]

Figure 2. Relapse risk after autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma according to age at transplant. Solid line patients 60 years old; dotted line <60 years old.

Survival after autologous stem cell transplantation
The elderly patients had a lower progression-free survival rate than that of the younger patients (Figure 3). The progression-free survival rate was 51% vs. 62% at 3 years, respectively (p<0.001). In a multivariate analysis the following factors were associated with poorer progression-free survival: age 60 years (RR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0–1.5, p=0.02), no rituximab therapy prior to ASCT (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2–1.8, p<0.001), two or more lines of therapy before ASCT (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.4–2.0, p=0.001), poor performance status (RR 2.1, 95% CI 1.5–2.9, p=0.001), and refractory disease (RR 2.7, 95% CI 2.1–3.5, p=0.001). Elderly patients who had had two or more treatment lines prior to ASCT had a poorer progression-free survival than that of younger patients (RR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0–1.5, p=0.04). The impact of rituximab therapy prior to ASCT was specifically analyzed as a function of disease status at transplantation. Previous rituximab use did not have any impact on the progression-free survival of patients autografted in first complete remission. The absence of prior rituximab therapy was, however, associated with poorer progression-free survival in patiens transplanted in second complete remission (p=0.03).

View larger version (11K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]

Figure 3. Progression-free survival after autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma according to the age at transplant. Solid line patients 60 years; dotted line <60 years old.

The overall survival rate was inferior in the group of elderly patients when compared to that in younger patients (Figure 4). Overall survival was 60% vs. 70%, respectively, at 3 years (p<0.001). In multivariate analysis seven factors were associated with lower overall survival: male gender (RR 1.2, 95% CI 1–1.4, p=0.04), age 60 years (RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2–1.7, p=0.001), no rituximab therapy prior to ASCT (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2–1.9, p<0.001), elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase level at diagnosis (RR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.6, p=0.008), two or more lines of therapy prior to ASCT (RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.5–2.2, p=0.001), poor performance status at ASCT (RR 2.7, 95% CI 1.8–3.9, p=0.001) and refractory disease at ASCT (RR 2.9, 95% CI 2.2–3.9, p=0.001).

View larger version (10K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]

Figure 4. Overall survival after autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma according to the age at the time of transplant. Solid line patients 60 years old; dotted line: <60 years old.

TOP ABSTRACT Introduction Design and Methods Results Discussion References

 
This retrospective study based on data collected in the EBMT registry considered more than 2600 transplanted DLBCL patients with MED-B reports available. Notably there were 463 patients 60 years old at the time of transplantation, allowing some estimation of non-relapse mortality and outcome in elderly patients with DLBCL. The main observations were a somewhat higher non-relapse mortality rate among the elderly patients than among the younger ones, but a reasonable outcome after ASCT. These observations are of importance, especially with regards to a generally poorer outcome of elderly patients with DLBCL.

The proportion of elderly DLBCL patients transplanted increased during the study period. There may be several reasons for this. Increasing experience with ASCT in many centers might be one explanation as might be improvements in transplant settings including, for example, the use of blood progenitor cells and better supportive care. In addition, the proportion of elderly patients in the population is increasing and, therefore, so too is the proportion of elderly DLBCL patients in most affluent societies. Consequently, more elderly and often otherwise fit patients are considered for ASCT if they have poor initial features or relapse after first-line therapy.

The rate of early non-relapse mortality, i.e. within 100 days of ASCT, among the elderly patients in this series (4.4%) compares favorably with the rates in many earlier smaller series in which a significant proportion of the patients had DLBCL.^19,20 A probable explanation is that the present series includes only patients transplanted more recently while previous studies have included patients transplanted during a longer time period. Of note, there was no statistically significant difference in non-relapse mortality between patients aged 60–64 and those aged 65–69 in our analysis. The number of patients over 70 years old was too small for any meaningful analysis. In general the causes of non-relapse mortality were comparable in younger and older patients, with infectious complications predominating. The only major difference was in the risk of second malignancies, which was higher in elderly patients.

The follow-up of this registry analysis is relatively short. However, taking into account that the median time to relapse after ASCT in patients with DLBCL is only 4 months,²³ the observation time is sufficient to be able to estimate the risk of relapse. With regards to non-relapse mortality it is likely that the proportion of cardiovascular deaths would increase in the elderly patients and the relative proportion of infectious causes would decrease with prolonged follow-up. The same holds true with second malignancies, most of which may have nothing to do with treatment of DLBCL as such.

All transplanted patients are to some extent selected based on either patient or disease-related characteristics or both. It is likely that elderly patients are even more selected than younger patients but this is impossible to judge on the basis of a retrospective registry analysis. It would be interesting to ask transplant centers whether they have exactly the same inclusion and exclusion criteria for older and younger patients with DLBCL. The answers to this question could offer insight into the patient selection process used in various centers and give some basis for guidelines. Various co-morbidity indices have been used in the allogeneic setting.^24,25 Such instruments might be useful also in elderly patients for whom ASCT is contemplated.

In this registry series, elderly patients with DLBCL had poorer progression-free and overall survival rates than those of younger patients. This was in part due to a higher risk of relapse and limited salvage options after relapse but also due to higher non-relapse mortality. Taking into account the facts that elderly patients had more often received ASCT after at least two treatment lines and were less often in the first complete remission at the time of transplantation, the outcome of the elderly population seems to be reasonable.

Due to more common co-morbid conditions, elderly patients tend to have more toxicities associated with high-dose therapy. There may be ways to improve this.²⁶ In addition to patient selection, the conditioning regimen also appears to be important. Regimens based on total body irradiation have conventionally been used cautiously in elderly patients, which was also apparent in this registry analysis. BEAM was the most commonly used regimen both in elderly and younger patients. In multivariate analysis of the present study, no differences were observed in the outcomes according to the conditioning regimen used. Routine use of G-CSF after stem cell infusion might be advisable especially in elderly patients. The combined use of radioimmunotherapy together with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell support might be one possibility to increase the efficacy of the autologous procedure without increasing early treatment-related toxicities.²⁷

To conclude, ASCT is feasible in selected, elderly patients with DLBCL although non-relapse mortality is higher than in younger patients. The outcome seems to be reasonable when considering the generally poorer outcome of non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas in elderly patients. More studies are needed to optimize patient selection as well as to decrease early and long-term toxicity of ASCT. Age, as such, should no longer be considered a contraindication to ASCT in patients up to 70 years of age with non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas.

 
Authorship and Disclosures

EJ conceived and designed the study and was responsible for the final interpretation of the data and the final draft of the manuscript; CC was responsible for the statistical analysis, interpretation of data and creation of the tables and figures; AR, GO, BA, DB, EC, HT, GC, FC, AH, NR, NM, PD and MP participated in patients' care, data recording and interpretation and analysis of the data; AS participated in the design of the study, interpretation of the data, critically reviewed the manuscript and gave an important intellectual contribution. All authors were involved in the final revision of the manuscript and final approval of the version to be published. The authors reported no potential conflicts of interest.

Received for publication April 28, 2008. Revision received July 1, 2008. Accepted for publication July 16, 2008.

TOP ABSTRACT Introduction Design and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, Herbrecht R, Tilly H, Bouabdallah R, et al. CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2002;346:235-42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Pfreundschuh M, Trumper L, Kloess M, Schmits R, Feller AC, Rube C, et al. Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of elderly patients with aggressive lymphomas: results of the NHL-B2 trial of DSHNHL. Blood 2004;104:634-41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Philip T, Guglielmi C, Hagenbeek A, Somerts R, van dert Lelie H, Bron D, et al. Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared to salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy sensitive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1540-5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Haioun C, Lepage E, Gisselbrecht C, Salles G, Coiffier B, Brice P, et al. Survival benefit of high-dose therapy in poor-risk aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: final analysis of the prospective LNH87-2 protocol – a Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adulte study. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:3025-30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Gianni AM, Bregni M, Siena S, Brambilla C, Di Nicola M, Lombardi F, et al. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation compared with MACOP-B in aggressive B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1290-7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Milpied N, Deconinck E, Gaillard F, Delwail V, Foussard C, Berthou C, et al. Initial treatment of aggressive lymphoma with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell support. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1287-95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Verdonck LF, van Putten WLJ, Hagenbeek A, Schouten HC, Sonneveld P, van Imhoff GW, et al. Comparison of CHOP chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation in slowly responding patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1045-51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Kluin-Nelemans HC, Zagonel V, Anastasopoulou A, Bron D, Roozendaal KJ, Noordijk EM, et al. Standard chemotherapy with or without high-dose chemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a randomised phase III EORTC study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:22-30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Gisselbrecht C, Lepage E, Molina T, Quesnel B, Fillet G, Lederlin P, et al. Shortened first-line high-dose chemotherapy for patients with poor-prognosis aggressive lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:2472-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Kaiser U, Uebelacker I, Abel U, Birkmann J, Truemper L, Schmalen-berg H, et al. Randomized study to evaluate the use of high-dose therapy as a part of primary treatment for ‘aggressive’ lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:4413-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Martelli M, Gherlinzoni F, De Renzo A, Zinzani PL, De Vivo A, Cantonetti M, et al. Early autologous stem cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy as front-line therapy in high-risk, aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: an Italian randomized multicenter trial. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:1255-62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Moreau P, Milpied N, Voillat L, Colombat P, Mahe B, Rapp MJ, et al. Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation as front-line therapy in patients aged 61–65 years: a pilot study. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998;21:1193-6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
13. Leger CS, Bredeson C, Kearns B, Bence-Bruckler I, Atkins H, Huebsch L. Autologous blood and marrow transplantation in patients 60 years and older. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2000;6:204-10.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
14. Jantunen E, Mahlamäki E, Nousiainen T. Feasibility and toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy supported by peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in elderly patients (60 years) with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: comparison with patients <60 years treated within the same protocol. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000;26:737-41.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
15. Olivieri A, Capelli D, Montanari M, Brunori M, Massidda D, Poloni A, et al. Very low toxicity and good quality of life in 48 elderly patients auto-transplanted for haematological malignancies: a single centre experience. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001;27:1189-95.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
16. Zallio F, Cuttica A, Caracciolo D, Gavarotti P, Bergui L, Giaretta F, et al. Feasibility of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilisation and harvest to support chemotherapy intensification in elderly patients with poor prognosis non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann Hematol 2002;81:448-53.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
17. Bitran JD, Klein L, Link D, Kosirog-Glowacki J, Stewart C, Raack D, et al. High-dose myeloablative therapy and autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in elderly patients (greater than 65 years of age) with relapsed large cell lymphoma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2003;9:383-8.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
18. Villela L, Sureda A, Canals C, Sanz MA Jr, Martino R, Valcarcel D, et al. Low transplant-related mortality in older patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. Haematologica 2003;88:300-5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Gopal AK, Gooley TA, Golden JB, Maloney DG, Bensinger WI, Petersdorf SH, et al. Efficacy of high-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in adults 60 years of age and older. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001;27:593-9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
20. Jantunen E, Itälä M, Juvonen E, Leppä S, Keskinen L, Vasala K, et al. Autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly (60 years) patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a nation-wide analysis. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006;37:367-72.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
21. Buadi FK, Micallef IN, Ansell SM, Porrata LF, Dispenzieri A, Elliot MA, et al. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for older patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006;37:1017-22.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
22. Hosing C, Saliba RM, Okoroji GJ, Popat U, Couriel D, Ali T, et al. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous progenitor cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients >65 years of age. Ann Oncol 2008;19:1166-71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Kuittinen T, Wiklund T, Remes K, Elonen E, Lehtinen T, Kuitttinen O, et al. Outcome of progressive disease after autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a nationwide survey. Eur J Haematol 2005;75:199-205.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
24. Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storb R, Baron F, Sandmaier BM, Maloney DG, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantatation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT. Blood 2005;106:2912-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Artz AS, Pollyea DA, Kocherginsky M, Stock W, Rich E, Odenike O, et al. Performance status and comorbidity predict transplant-related mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006;12:954-64.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
26. Jantunen E. Autologous stem cell transplantation beyond 60 years of age. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006;38:715-20.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
27. Gopal AK, Rajendran JG, Gooley TA, Pagel JM, Fisher DR, Petersdorf SH, et al. High-dose 131-tositu-momab (anti-CD20) radioimmunotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for adults >60 years old with relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:1396-402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jantunen, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jantunen, E.