Haematologica
HOME HELP FEEDBACK TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SUBSCRIPTIONS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 12 June 2008
Haematologica, Vol 93, Issue 8, 1278-1280 doi:10.3324/haematol.12688
Copyright © 2008 by Ferrata Storti Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by González-Vicent, M.
Right arrow Articles by Díaz, M. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by González-Vicent, M.
Right arrow Articles by Díaz, M. A.

Stem Cell Transplantation

Extracorporeal photochemotherapy for steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease in low-weight pediatric patients. Immunomodulatory effects and clinical outcome

Marta González-Vicent, Manuel Ramírez, Antonio Pérez, Alvaro Lassaletta, Julián Sevilla, Miguel Ángel Díaz

Hospital Niño Jesús, Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Section, Madrid, Spain

Correspondence: Marta González Vicent, Stem Cell Transplant Unit, Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Section, Hospital Niño Jesús Madrid, Spain. Phone: international +34.915035938. Fax: international +34-915035902. E-mail:mgonzalezv.hnjs{at}salud.madrid.org

Key words: extracorporeal photochemotherapy, GVHD, pediatrics.

Pediatric patients with refractory graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) have been considered for extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP). The main problems with ECP in children, especially in the smaller ones, are technical difficulties of leukaphereses with a large extracorporeal volume. Only a few pediatric centers have experience with ECP, mainly with older children.1,2 We report the clinical outcome in very low-weight pediatric patients who underwent ECP for refractory GVHD and the effect on the lymphocyte subsets. Between September 2003 and April 2007, 11 children with a body weight lower than 25 kg underwent ECP by refractory GVHD. Patients’ characteristics are shown in Table 1. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine and methotrexate. Diagnosis (clinical and histological) and classification of GVHD was made according to published criteria.3 Steroid refractory was defined as failure to respond to 2 mg/kg/day of 6-methilprednisolone after five days (acute GVHD) and flare-up of disease activity upon tapering (chronic GVHD). All patients received cyclosporine A or mycophenolate mofetil and steroids as first-line therapy. ECP was used as second-line treatment in 4 patients who received etanercept prior to ECP. Written informed consent was obtained from all patient’s parents and our institution’s ethics committee approved the study. Lymphocytopheresis was performed using a continuous-flow cell separator (Spectra, COBE, Lakewood, CO, USA; version 6.1) processing 2 blood volumes as previously reported.4 The product was diluted with normal saline to a volume of 300 mL by the addition of 3 mL of 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) aqueous solution (Gerot Pharmaceutika, Vienna, Austria) to achieve a product concentration of 200 ng/mL. This final product was transferred to a UVA-permeable bag (MacoPharma, Tourcoing, France), exposed to UVA irradiation (UV-MATIC irradiator, Vilbert Lourmat, France) at a dose of 2 J/cm2 and reinfused.5 The average time of ECP procedure was 180 minutes. The machine was primed with packed red blood cells in patients with body weight <15 kg. No standard prophylaxis of hypocalcemia was used.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Table 1. Patients’ characteristics and outcome (n=11).

 
ECP sessions were performed twice a week (consecutive days) until clinical improvement for acute GVHD. Patients with chronic GVHD were given EPC on two consecutive days (one cycle) at 2-week intervals. Progressive tapering of immunosuppressive therapy and discontinuation of ECP depended on clinical response which was defined according to previously published crtiteria.6

Flow cytometry analyses (FACSCanto II, Beckton Dickinson) were carried out on peripheral blood samples. We studied the L-selectin (CD62L) and the CD45RA expression on CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes. This combination allowed us to distinguish naive (TN, CD62L+ CD45RA+), central memory (TCM, CD62L+CD45RA), effector memory (TEM, CD62L-CD45RA), and terminal differentiated T cells (TT, CD62L-CD45RA+), as described elsewhere.7 We compared the proportion of each of these four subpopulations, as well as the L-selectin positive and L-selectin negative ones, in peripheral blood before the first (pre-) and after the last (post-) ECP procedures. We compared the changes related to the ECP with the T-lymphocyte subset reconstitution in children without GVHD to find out whether ECP could mimic a normalization of T-lymphocyte subsets. One hundred and eighteen ECP procedures were performed with a median of 9 procedures (range: 2–25) per patient. ECP was started at a median of 191 days (range: 12–1635) after transplant. Eight patients were thrombocytopenic at the time of starting ECP.

CR was achieved in 5 cases and PR in 6. CR of skin, liver and gut involvement was achieved in 10/11, 3/4 and 5/8 cases respectively. The median time to response was three weeks. Clinical outcome is shown in Table 1.

There was a significant increase in the CD4/CD8 ratio. We found that the proportion of L-selectin expressing T lymphocytes significantly diminished after ECP, both in CD4 and CD8 cells (Table 2). No changes were observed in CD4 and CD8 naive subsets. In patients without GVHD, these analyses showed a progressive decrease in the proportion of CD62L positive memory CD8 lymphocytes, but no significant changes in the expression of CD62L by CD4 lymphocytes (unpublished data). No patient developed hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic treatment. Only 2 patients (the smaller patients, weight 9 Kg) needed a fluid bolus because of vasovagal effects, but the procedures were not stopped. No symptomatic hypocalcemia was presented. Three episodes of catheter-related infection (staph. species) were seen. No ECP-related severe infections were observed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Table 2. CD4 and CD8 subsets pre- and post-extracorporeal photo-chemotherapy.

 
Only one patient transplanted in refractory disease relapsed post-trasplant. Four patients died: one of microangiopathy and 3 of fungal infections.

Several reports have been published about successful treatment of GVHD by ECP in adults using the UVAR XTS system (Therakos, Inc.).6,8,9 Only a few pediatric centers perform ECP1,10 and the main problems are related to the ECP technique itself. As small children may not tolerate the fluid shift during ECP using the UVAR XTS machine, an alternative approach by means of a continuous-flow cell separator (COBE Spectra) has been developed.11 This procedure allows the processing of more mononuclear cells in a smaller volume with a shorter duration than with the UVAR system. Vasovagal effects were the most frequent adverse events but no procedure was interrupted for this reason. There was no increase of severe infections due to the ECP procedure. Our findings show changes in the immune reconstitution of patients who underwent ECP with a decrease in the proportion of T-lymphocytes expressing L-selectin. This change mimics the normal reconstitution kinetics (in patients without GVHD) after transplant for CD8 lymphocytes, but not for CD4. The proportion of L-selectin expressing T lymphocytes significantly diminished after ECP, both in CD4 and in CD8 cells. The reasons for these changes are currently unknown. L-selectin is an important T-cell homing receptor for T-cell entry into lymph nodes via high endothelial venules. Expression of CD62L is rapidly lost following T-cell receptor activation, leading to exit from the lymph node into the periphery and sites of inflammation. CD62Lneg and CD62Lpos also differ in their functional abilities, such as cytokine secretion and cytolytic potential.12 Our results suggest that ECP may have an impact on the trafficking patterns of T lymphocytes, redirectioning T cells from lymphoid to extralymphoid organs.

In conclusion, ECP is well tolerated using the described method in small children with minimal side effects during therapy. Clinical response seems to be associated with change in the peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets.


    References
 TOP
 References
 

  1. Dall’Amico R, Rossetti F, Zulian G, Montini L, Murer B, Andreetta C, et al. Photopheresis in paediatric patients with drug-resistant chronic graft-versus-host disease. Br J Haematol 1997;97:848-54.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  2. Chan KW. Extracorporeal photopheresis in children with graft-versus-host disease. J Clin Apher 2006;21:60-4.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  3. Glucksberg H, Storb R, Fefer A, Buckner CD, Neiman PE, Clift RA, et al. Clinical manifestations of graft-versus-host disease in human recipients of marrow from HLA-matched sibling donors. Transplantation 1974;18:295-304.[ISI][Medline]
  4. Sevilla J, González-Vicent M, Madero L, Díaz MA. Peripheral blood progenitor cell collection in low-weight children. J Hematother Stem Cell Res 2002;11:633-42.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  5. Salvaneschi L, Perotti C, Zecca M, Bernuzzi S, Viarengo G, Giorgiani G, et al. Extracorporeal photochemotherapy for treatment of acute and chronic GVHD in childhood. Transfusion 2001;41:1299-305.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  6. Greinix HT, Volc-Platzer B, Rabitsch W, Gminhart B, Guevara-Pineda C, Kalhs P, et al. Successful use of extracorporeal photochemotherapy in the treatment of severe acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood 1998;92:3098-104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Lanzavecchia A, Sallusto F. Dynamics of T lymphocyte responses: intermediates, effectors, and memory cells. Science 2000;290:92-7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Foss FM, DiVenuti GM, Chin K, Sprague K, Grodman H, Klein A, et al. Prospective study of extracorporeal photopheresis in steroid-refractory or steroid-resistant extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease: analysis of response and survival incorporating prognostic factors. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005;35:1187-93.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  9. Peritt D. Potential mechanisms of photopheresis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006;12:7-12.[ISI][Medline]
  10. Kanold J, Merlin E, Halle P, Pailland C, Marabelle A, Rapatel C, et al. Photopheresis in pediatric graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic marrow transplantation: clinical practice guidelines based on field experience and review of literature. Transfusion 2007;47:2276-89.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  11. Andreu G, Leon A, Heshmati F, Tod M, Menkes CJ, Baudelot J, et al. Extracorporeal photochemotherapy: evaluation of two techniques and use in connective tissue disorders. Transf Sci 1994;15:443-54.[CrossRef]
  12. Greinix HT, Socie G, Bacigalupo A, Holler E, Edinger MG, Apperley JF, et al. Assessing the potential role of photopheresis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006;38:265-73.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by González-Vicent, M.
Right arrow Articles by Díaz, M. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by González-Vicent, M.
Right arrow Articles by Díaz, M. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SUBSCRIPTIONS