Published online 12 August 2008
Haematologica, Vol 93, Issue 9, 1418-1420 doi:10.3324/haematol.12807.
Copyright © 2008 by Ferrata Storti Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goemans, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Kaspers, G. J.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goemans, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Kaspers, G. J.L.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Outcome for children with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia in the Netherlands following initial treatment between 1980 and 1998: survival after chemotherapy only?

Bianca F. Goemans1, Rienk Y.J. Tamminga2,3, Carin M. Corbijn2, Karel Hählen2,4, GertJan J.L. Kaspers1,2

1 Department Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam
2 Dutch Childhood Oncology Group (DCOG), the Hague
3 Department Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Beatrix Children’s Hospital, UMCG, Groningen
4 Department Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Sophia Children’s Hospital, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Correspondence: Bianca F. Goemans, MD, PhD, Department of Pediatric Oncology-Hematology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Phone: international +31.20.4442420. Fax: international +31.20. 4442422. E-mail:bf.goemans{at}vumc.nl

Key words: acute myeloid leukemia, relapse, chemotherapy, stem cell transplantation.

We report the outcome of Dutch pediatric relapsed AML patients and focus on patients treated with chemotherapy alone. Median time from first complete remission to relapse was nine months. Second complete remission (CR2) was achieved in 63%. Overall, only 16% of patients were survivors. When only patients who achieved CR2 were analyzed, 50% of the patients treated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation and 24% of the patients treated with chemotherapy alone, were long-term survivors.

The prognosis of children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has improved markedly over the last decades with 5-year overall survival rates (5-year pOS) in the most recent treatment protocols as high as 50–60%.1 In the Netherlands, children with AML are treated according to protocols developed by the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group (DCOG). Since 1980, four protocols for the treatment of childhood AML have been completed, and overall survival has improved from 18% to 42%.2,3 Relapse remains the most frequent cause of treatment failure, with a cumulative risk of relapse of 30–40% in most pediatric AML studies.1 In the consecutive Dutch AML protocols, the cumulative risk of relapse was 60, 43, 47 and 26% respectively.3 Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is generally recommended as part of treatment of relapsed AML.4 Formal evidence for this recommendation is lacking, despite evidence of a graft-versus-leukemia effect in AML. At initial diagnosis of high-risk AML, alloSCT seems no better than chemotherapy only.4 Therefore, the need for alloSCT in relapsed AML may be questioned, at least as a general recommendation.

We studied all Dutch children and adolescents with AML that were initially diagnosed and treated between 1980 and 1998 and relapsed before 1st January 2007. The patients were initially treated according to the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group (DCOG) protocols AML-80, AML-82, AML-87 and AML-92/94.2,3 We focussed on patients reported to be alive without disease after treatment with chemotherapy only for their relapse and summarized the relevant literature. Since autologous SCT has been reported to provide similar results to intensive chemotherapy, and does not have a graft-versus-leukemia effect, these patients (n=9) were included in the chemotherapy only group.5 Most patients were treated with a reinduction regimen containing cytarabine, most frequently in combination with an anthracycline and etoposide.

A total of 113 relapsed AML cases were identified, with a median time from first complete remission (CR1) to relapse of nine months (range 1–61 months). Ninety of these patients were treated with curative intent and CR2 was achieved in 63%. In univariate analysis, sex, age, WBC, FAB-type and SCT in CR1 were not associated with achievement of CR2. None of the patients who failed to achieve remission on first-line treatment when treated for their initially diagnosed AML (n=11) achieved CR2, compared to 72% of patients who did achieve CR1 on first-line treatment ({chi}2 p<0.0001). CR1 duration (CR1≤1 year or CR1>1 year) correlated significantly with the probability of achieving CR2 (55 vs. 76%, p=0.04) and 10-year pOS (13 vs. 30%, p=0.02) in univariate analysis. The overall 10-year pOS was 16% (standard error (SE) 3%), with 18 disease-free long-term survivors.

AlloSCT was performed in 16 out of the 57 CR2 patients, with 8 (50%) long-term survivors. Ten out of the 41 patients (24%) treated without alloSCT survived. This comparison is biased by the fact that to be able to undergo SCT, it is necessary to have a suitable donor, to maintain CR2 until the SCT and to be in a relatively good condition. In multivariate analysis using Cox-regression, we corrected alloSCT in CR2 for time to transplant. In this analysis of pOS alloSCT was not an independent favorable prognostic factor (HR=0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26–1.24, p=0.15), as was also the case for CR1 duration (HR=1.5, 95% CI 0.78–2.88, p=0.23). This study was limited by its retrospective nature, the diverse treatment schedules used, and the relatively small number of patients, especially when prognostic factors were analyzed. The 10 long-term survivors treated at relapse without alloSCT (7 chemotherapy only, plus 3 auto-SCT) did not have unique or similar clinical or cell biological features and included 6 patients with relapse within 12 months from CR1 (Table 1). Some of these 10 patients had been treated in the 1990s with relatively intensive chemotherapy at initial diagnosis. In 10 out of 18 survivors, late effects of treatment were reported such as secondary malignancies, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and neurological problems. Late effects were more frequently reported in children who received a SCT than in children who did not, with 9/12 patients who were treated with SCT reporting late effects, compared to 1/6 patients treated with chemotherapy alone ({chi}2 p=0.019). In the literature, 6 papers describe the outcome of cohorts of pediatric relapsed AML patients (Table 2).6–11 Overall probabilities of survival at 2–5 years ranged from 12% to 34%. Including the patients in this study, 109 relapsed pediatric AML patients treated with chemotherapy alone were reported in literature and 34 of these 91 patients were reported as survivors (31%), which is surprisingly high. However, patient selection may have occurred, and some patients may not have received optimal treatment at initial diagnosis according to current standards.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Table 1. Long-term survivors of pediatric relapsed AML after treatment with chemotherapy alone.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Table 2. Reports of the outcome of children with relapsed AML.

Based on these results, we question whether an alloSCT in CR2 is the only chance of cure for children with relapsed AML, as is commonly thought.4 A randomized clinical trial to prove this has never been performed. Especially when a matched donor is unavailable, intensive chemotherapy may be preferable over a mismatched or haplo-identical donor SCT, which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.12,13 Currently, however, it is not known how to identify the patients who do not need an alloSCT for cure after relapse. Results of the ongoing International BFM Study Group Pediatric Relapsed AML protocol, will contribute to this discussion in the near future. The Dutch and literature data suggest that randomized studies of the role of alloSCT in sub-groups of relapsed AML are required. Meanwhile, experimental allogeneic SCT procedures, such as haplo-identical and mismatched unrelated donor SCT, should be carefully balanced against the chance of cure by chemotherapy only in patients in good quality second complete remission of AML.


arrow
References
TOP
 References
 
  1. Kaspers GJ, Creutzig U. Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: international progress and future directions. Leukemia 2005;19:2025-9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. van der Does-van den Berg A, Hahlen K, Colly LP, Vossen JM. Treatment of childhood acute nonlymphocytic leukemia with high-dose cytosine arabinoside, 6-thiogua-nine, and doxorubicin without maintenance therapy: pilot study ANLL-80 of the Dutch Childhood Leukemia Study Group (DCLSG). Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1988;5:93-102.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Kardos G, Zwaan CM, Kaspers GJ, de Graaf SS, de Bont ES, Postma A, et al. Treatment strategy and results in children treated on three Dutch Childhood Oncology Group acute myeloid leukemia trials. Leukemia 2006;19:2063-71.[Web of Science]
  4. Bierings M, Nachman JB, Zwaan CM. Stem cell transplantation in pediatric leukemia and myelodysplasia: state of the art and current challenges. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 2007;2:53-63.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Woods WG, Neudorf S, Gold S, Sanders J, Buckley JD, Barnard DR, et al. A comparison of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, autologous bone marrow transplantation, and aggressive chemotherapy in children with acute myeloid leukemia in remission. Blood 2001;97:56-62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Stahnke K, Boos J, Bender-Gotze C, Ritter J, Zimmermann M, Creutzig U. Duration of first remission predicts remission rates and long-term survival in children with relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia. Leukemia 1998;12:1534-8.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Wells RJ, Adams MT, Alonzo TA, Arceci RJ, Buckley J, Buxton AB, et al. Mitoxantrone and cytarabine induction, high-dose cytarabine, and etoposide intensification for pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia: Children’s Cancer Group Study 2951. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:2940-7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Webb DK, Wheatley K, Harrison G, Stevens RF, Hann IM. Outcome for children with relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia following initial therapy in the Medical Research Council (MRC) AML 10 trial. MRC Childhood Leukaemia Working Party. Leukemia 1999;13:25-31.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Aladjidi N, Auvrignon A, Leblanc T, Perel Y, Benard A, Bordigoni P, et al. Outcome in children with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia after initial treatment with the French Leucemie Aique Myeloide Enfant (LAME) 89/91 protocol of the French Society of Pediatric Hematology and Immunology. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:4377-85.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Rubnitz JE, Razzouk BI, Lensing S, Pounds S, Pui CH, Ribeiro RC. Prognostic factors and outcome of recurrence in childhood acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer 2007;109:157-63.[Medline]
  11. Abrahamsson J, Clausen N, Gustafsson G, Hovi L, Jonmundsson G, Zeller B, et al. Improved outcome after relapse in children with acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2007;136:229-36.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Veys P, Amrolia P, Rao K. The role of haploidentical stem cell transplantation in the management of children with haematological disorders. Br J Haematol 2003;123:193-206.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Drobyski WR, Klein J, Flomenberg N, Pietryga D, Vesole DH, Margolis DA, et al. Superior survival associated with transplantation of matched unrelated versus one-antigen-mismatched unrelated or highly human leukocyte antigen-disparate haploidentical family donor marrow grafts for the treatment of hematologic malignancies: establishing a treatment algorithm for recipients of alternative donor grafts. Blood 2002;99:806-14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goemans, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Kaspers, G. J.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goemans, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Kaspers, G. J.L.