Plasmacitoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasms |
1 Institute of Pathology, Spedali Civili, University of Brescia, Brescia
2 Unit of Hematopathology, University of Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola, Bologna
3 Institute of Hematology, University of Perugia, Perugia
4 Institute of Pathology, Policlinico "S. Matteo", University of Pavia, Pavia and
5 Institute of Hematology, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
Correspondence: Brunangelo Falini, MD, Institute of Hematology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy. E-mail:faliniem{at}unipg.it
|
|
|---|
Key words: plasmacytoid dendritic cells, acute myeloid leukemia, NPM1, nucleophosmin, mutations, antibodies, immunohistochemistry.
|
|
|---|
Among the most compelling evidence that AML with mutated NPM1 represents an entity is that NPM1 mutation – or its immunohistochemical surrogate, cytoplasmic nucleophosmin5 – is specific for AML6 (usually of de novo origin), is very stable during the course of the disease,7 is mutually exclusive of AML carrying recurrent genetic abnormalities8 and associates with distinct gene expression9 and microRNA profiles.10 However, no investigation has, as yet, been carried out into the relationship between NPMc+ AML and the blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell (BPDC) neoplasm11 (previously known as blastic NK-cell lymphoma or agranular CD4+/CD56+ hematodermic neoplasm), that has been also introduced as a distinct entity in the new WHO classification.11
Distinction between these two pathological conditions is important since they may share some clinical and pathological features (e.g. high frequency of cutaneous and leukemic dissemination, expression of the macrophage-restricted CD68 molecule and CD34-negativity).11 On the other hand, since BPDC is generally associated with genetic abnormalities and dismal clinical evolution, the study of nucleophosmin status in BPDC could be of interest in the process of designation of AML with mutated NPM1 as a distinct clinico-pathological entity.
In this study, we provide evidence that the immunohistochemical study of subcellular distribution of nucleophosmin allows the two entities to be genetically separated. In fact, nucleophosmin is cytoplasmic in NPMc+ AML (because of the presence of NPM1 mutations) but nucleus-restricted in BPDC neoplasm (because of a germline NPM1 gene). Our results, have important diagnostic implications, further clarify the cell of origin of NPMc+ AML, and justify the inclusion of AML with mutated NPM1 and BPDC neoplasm as separate entities in the new WHO classification.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Table 1. Phenotypic features of 13 BPDC neoplasms.
|
The antibody-antigen reaction was revealed by immunoalkaline phosphatase (APAAP) or immunoperoxidase, according to standard procedures.1
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (148K): [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Figure 1. Expression pattern of nucleophosmin (NPM) in BPDC neoplasm (skin involvement). (A) Dense dermal infiltrate by immature tumor cells, not involving the epidermis (skin biopsy; hematoxylin-eosin; x200; inset, x500). (B–E) Leukemic cells express the classical BPDC neoplasm phenotype, that includes CD4, CD56, CD123, and TCL1. (F) Leukemic cells show a nucleus-restricted positivity for nucleophosmin, which is indicative of wild-type NPM1 gene. (B–F): paraffin sections from skin biopsy immunostained with anti-CD4, anti-CD56, anti-CD123, anti-TCL1 and anti-nucleophosmin (monoclonal antibody, clone 376). Immunoperoxidase procedure, hematoxylin counterstain; x 800.
|
![]() View larger version (139K): [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Figure 2. Expression pattern of nucleophosmin (NPM) in BPDC neoplasm (bone marrow involvement). (A) Diffuse marrow infiltration by blast cells. A residual megakaryocyte is present (bone marrow biopsy; hematoxylineosin; x800). (B) Leukemic cells express the macrophage-restricted form of the CD68 antigen with a dot-like pattern; the arrow indicates a histiocyte. (C) Most leukemic cells are strongly positive for the CD123 molecule. (D) Leukemic cells show a nucleus-restricted positivity for nucleophosmin which is indicative of wild-type NPM1 gene. A mitotic figure (arrow) shows the expected nucleophosmin cytoplasmic positivity. (B–D) Paraffin sections from bone marrow trephines immunostained with monoclonal antibodies against CD68 (PG-M1), CD123, and nucleophosmin (clone 376). (B) and (D), immunophosphatase alkaline (APAAP) technique; hematoxylin counterstain; x800; (C): immunoperoxidase procedure hematoxylin counterstain; x800.
|
Our immunohistological results clearly indicate that cytoplasmic expression of nucleophosmin (the surrogate marker for NPM1 mutation)5 is mutually exclusive of BPDC neoplasm and other PDC proliferations. These findings concur with reports that 10–20% of BPDC neoplasms are associated with, or develop into AML, which can evolve from underlying myelodysplasia,11 and that PDC nodules are not infrequently present in myelodysplastic syndromes. NPM1 mutation, on the contrary, appears to be characteristic of de novo AML13 and mutually exclusive of myelodysplastic syndromes.14 Cytogenetically, the two conditions are also quite different. Most cases of NPMc+ AML are associated with normal karyotype,1 while about two-thirds of BPDC neoplasms have an abnormal karyotype,11 which is usually characterized by complex, albeit not specific, chromosome aberrations. Mutual exclusion of NPM1 mutation and BPDC neoplasm may reflect not only different underlying genetic backgrounds but also diverse cells of origin. BPDC is thought to derive from the precursors of plasmacytoid dendritic cells, a specialized subset of dendritic cells that are also known as professional type-1 interferon producing cells or plasmacytoid monocytes.15 A multilineage potential in some cases of BPDC neoplasm is suggested by immunophenotypic heterogeneity with regards to TdT, association with myeloid disorders and expression of lymphoid markers (such as CD2, CD5 and, more rarely, CD3).11 Although multilineage involvement is also a feature of NPMc+ AML,16 it is restricted to the compartment of myeloid cells since NPM1 mutations do not target lymphoid cells.17 Our results suggest that NPM1 mutations may also spare the yet poorly understood pathways leading to PDC generation in bone marrow.18 The results presented herein also have implications in the differential diagnosis between BPDC neoplasm and myelomonocytic (M4) or monoblastic/monocytic (M5) leukemia.19 This may represent a major diagnostic dilemma, because all these pathological conditions, in addition to bone marrow infiltration, may show skin or lymph node involvement, negativity for CD34 and expression of the macrophage-restricted CD68 molecule. Immunohistochemical detection in paraffin sections of several PDC-associated molecules, including CD123 (interleukin-3
-chain receptor), TCL1, CD2AP,12 CD56 and CD4 is a valid diagnostic assay. However, none of these markers is specific for BPDC neoplasm, as AML cells may express TCL1, or CD123, as well as CD56, associated or not with CD4. Immunostaining for nucleophosmin can be of help in distinguishing AML or myeloid sarcoma with mutated NPM1, especially the subset with MPO–/CD4+/CD56+ phenotype, which is characterized by aberrant cytoplasmic NPM,20 from the BPDC neoplasm which shows nucleus-restricted NPM positivity. The distinction between BPDC neoplasm and NPMc+ AML is clinically elevant since BPDC is usually very aggressive,11 with a median survival of 12–14 months, whilst NPMc+ AML, in the absence of a concomitant internal tandem duplication of FLT3 (FLT3 -ITD), has a favorable prognosis.2 In conclusion, our results point to subcellular nucleophosmin expression as another marker to be added to the battery of morphological, immunohistochemical and cytogenetic studies which are required in the differential diagnosis between BPDC neoplasm and AML. Anti-NPM immunohistochemistry appears to be particularly useful since, given the rarity of BPDC neoplasm and the small size of skin biopsies (the most frequently involved site), fresh material for cytogenetic and molecular studies more often is not available. Moreover, our results provide additional information on the NPMc+ AML cell of origin and justify the inclusion of AML with mutated NPM1 and BPDC neoplasm as separate entities in the new WHO classification of myeloid neoplasms.11,21
BF had the original idea of the study and wrote the manuscript. FF and SAP performed immunohistochemical studies and helped write the manuscript. CA, MPM, MP, AV and MFM provided and analyzed samples.
The authors reported no potential conflicts of interest.
The online version of this paper contains a supplementary appendix. Funding: this work was supported by the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (A.I.R.C.) (to MFM and BF) and Fondazione Berlucchi (to FF). Acknowledgments: we thank Roberta Pacini, Manola Carini, Simona Righi, and Wilma Pellegrini for performing the immunohistochemical stainings, Mrs. Claudia Tibidò for the secretarial assistance and Dr G A Boyd for English language editing.
Received for publication August 26, 2008. Revision received September 29, 2008. Accepted for publication October 2, 2008.
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||