Myeloproliferative Neoplasms |
Institute of Hematology, Catholic University, Rome
Correspondence: Valerio De Stefano, Institute of Hematology, Catholic University, Largo Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy. E-mail:valerio.destefano{at}rm.unicatt.it
|
|
|---|
Key words: essential thrombocythemia, thrombosis, JAK2 V617F mutation, inherited thrombophilia.
|
|
|---|
The JAK2 V617F mutation is detectable in the large majority of patients with PV and in about half of patients with ET;9 in the latter, the phenotype shows multiple features resembling PV, such as increased hemoglobin and white blood cells.10,11 The JAK2 mutation is associated with enhanced platelet and leukocyte activation as well as plasma hypercoagulability.12,13 This, and the evidence that leukocytosis is associated with an enhanced hazard for thrombosis,4,14,15 could be a plausible basis underlying in ET an increased risk for thrombosis in the patients with the mutation in comparison with those without.
A meta-analysis of 2,436 patients with ET estimated that the JAK2 mutation was associated with a 1.8-fold increased risk for thrombosis.16 In contrast, in a recently published cohort of 657 patients with ET, the JAK2 mutation did not influence the risk for thrombosis.15 Such discrepancies could be explained, in part, by different mutational loads in the patients investigated, related to whether the individuals harbored the mutation in the homozygous status (i.e. >50% mutant allele burden), who are more prone to overall thrombosis17 and to arterial thrombosis.15 The effect of the combined carriership of the JAK2 V617F mutation and the inherited thrombophilia on the thrombotic risk is unknown. In the present study, we tackled this issue by assessing in a cohort of patients with ET the risk of thrombosis according to the JAK2 V617F mutational load and to the presence of inherited thrombophilia.
|
|
|---|
The JAK2 V617 mutation was detected by allele-specific polymerase chain reaction according to Baxter et al.19 The sequencing analysis was carried out according to Wolanskyj et al.20 Heterozygous or homozygous status was defined as a mutant allele burden
50% or > 50%, respectively. Screening for thrombophilia included measuring antithrombin and protein C functional activities, free protein S antigen, and fasting homocysteine; searching for the FV Leiden, for the PT G20210A, and for antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, and anti-β2glycoprotein I).8,21
All the assays were performed blinded to the diagnosis and clinical history of the patients.
Study end-points
The events of interest were thromboses that occurred as inaugural manifestation of ET or during follow-up. Inaugural thromboses encompass the events occurring within the two years preceding the diagnosis, translating the knowledge that 75% of thromboses which indicate PV occur within this interval of time.22 The recorded events were cerebrovascular disease [ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA)], acute coronary syndrome (acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris), peripheral arterial thrombosis, retinal artery or vein occlusion, thrombosis of deep veins (including cerebral and splanchnic veins), and pulmonary embolism. Splanchnic venous thrombosis includes occlusion of hepatic, portal, mesenteric, and splenic veins. Moreover, superficial vein thromboses diagnosed by ultrasound objective methods were also computed. Diagnosis of first or recurrent major thrombosis was accepted only if objectively proven according to previously published criteria.23
Clinical characteristics
The clinical characteristics of the investigated patients are shown in Table 1. Thirty-eight (28.7%) suffered from thrombosis, arterial in two-thirds of the cases and venous in one-third. Thrombosis was inaugural in 34 cases and occurred during the follow-up in 10 (4 first thromboses and 6 recurrences). Recurrences were myocardial infarction in one case, splenic infarction in one, superficial vein thrombosis in 2, pulmonary embolism in one, and cerebral venous thrombosis in one. After diagnosis of ET, the patients with thrombosis of splanchnic or cerebral veins received long-term oral anticoagulation. All the remaining patients received antiplatelet agents, independently of the occurrence of a previous thrombosis. Forty-nine patients were prescribed cytoreduction: hydroxyurea in 32 cases, interferon in 11, and anagrelide in 6. We computed a total observation time of 454 years (median 3.2, range 1–6).
|
View this table: [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Table 1. Patients characteristics.
|
2 test, and the Mann-Whitney test employed when appropriate (statistical significance p<0.05). The relative risk (RR) for thrombosis with the 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was estimated by a 2 x 2 contingency table.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Table 2. Patients characteristics according to the JAK2 mutational status. ET-related thrombotic events are recorded, after the exclusion of those that occurred prior to two years before the diagnosis. Statistically significant values of the relative risk for thrombosis are in bold.
|
Risk of thrombosis in the patient groups
The distribution of thromboses according to the presence of the JAK2 mutation is shown in Table 2. The rate of ET-related first thrombosis was higher in the patients with the mutation (30/83, 36.1%), in comparison with those without (8/49, 16.3%, p=0.01). The rate of first thrombosis was significantly higher both in homozygotes (5/8, 62.5%, p=0.01) and heterozygotes (25/75, 33.3%, p=0.03). The RR for thrombosis was increased 2-fold in heterozygotes, and 3.8-fold in homozygotes as compared with patients without the mutation (Table 2). A separate analysis showed that the RR was statistically significant only with regard to arterial thrombosis and to the homozygous status (RR 4.9 in comparison with wild-type patients) (Table 2). The analysis restricted to thrombotic inaugural manifestations provided a similar estimate, whereas during the follow-up the RR for thrombosis was 6.1-fold increased among homozygotes, but was not influenced by the heterozygous state (Table 2). During follow-up, the incidence of thrombosis was 2.2 percent patient-years: 1.8 among the wild-type individuals, 1.6 among the heterozygotes, and 7.9 among the homozygotes. Thrombosis was a first event in 4 patients (receiving hydroxyurea [n=2] or interferon [n=2]) and a recurrence in 6 (receiving hydroxyurea [n=3] or interferon [n=1], or no cytoreduction [n=2]); overall, after diagnosis of ET only 2 events out of 10 occurred in the absence of cytoreduction. The prevalence of inherited thrombophilia did not differ among the patient groups (JAK2 V617F absent vs. heterozygous vs. homozygous) (p=0.34). Overall, the RR for thrombosis associated with thrombophilia was 2.70 (95% CI 1.55– 4.70). Among the patients with the JAK2 mutation, those with thrombophilia had a RR of 2.56 (1.58– 4.15) in comparison with those without thrombophilia. Among patients without thrombophilia those with the JAK2 mutation had an RR of 1.94 (95% CI 0.96–3.96) in comparison with those without the mutation. The carriers of both the JAK2 mutation and inherited thrombophilia had an RR of 5.0 (95% CI 2.41–10.34) in comparison with patients with neither the mutation nor thrombophilia, suggesting an additive interaction between the two risk factors (Table 3). Such an increase in the RR was significant only as regards the inaugural thromboses (RR 4.57, 95%CI 1.88–11.10). During the follow-up the carriers of both the JAK2 mutation and inherited thrombophilia had an RR of 8.16 (95%CI 0.58–114.40) in comparison with patients with neither the mutation and thrombophilia, without achieving statistical significance likely due to the small number of events. None of them had a recurrent thrombosis.
|
View this table: [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Table 3. Relative risk for thrombosis at any time in the overall patients and after stratification by age according to the presence of the JAK2 V617F mutation and thrombophilia. Statistically significant values of the relative risk for thrombosis are in bold.
|
Inherited thrombophilia produced a limited impact on the overall risk for thrombosis at any time, which was 2.7-fold increased among the carriers with respect to the non-carriers. This small increase in risk is in agreement with the mild clinical penetrance associated with heterozygosity of FV Leiden or PT G20210A.8 However, in the presence of both the JAK2 mutation and inherited thrombophilia, the risk was 5-fold increased in comparison with non-carriers of either alteration, suggesting an additive interaction.
After stratification of the patients according to age, the presence of the JAK2 mutation was associated with a 3.8-fold enhanced risk for thrombosis only in those <60 years, but not in those >60 years. In the group of the younger patients with the JAK2 mutation, the presence of thrombophilia increased the risk for thrombosis at any time 2.2-fold in comparison with mutated patients without thrombophilia and 7.7-fold in comparison with wild-type patients without thrombophilia. We acknowledge that the results of our study are based on a small number of individuals carrying both inherited thrombophilia and the JAK2 mutation. Indeed, the characteristics of our cohort reflect the current knowledge concerning ET as regarding the rate of thrombosis, the rate of the JAK2 V617F mutation and its homozygosity, and the phenotype associated with the mutation. Finally, the prevalence of inherited thrombophilia was similar to that found in the general population. Therefore, our results are unlikely to be biased and can be generalized. In conclusion, in the younger patients with ET the thrombotic risk is higher in the JAK2 V617F-mutated and is further increased by the presence of inherited thrombophilia. Accordingly, it can be suggested that the knowledge of the JAK2 mutation (especially in the homozygous state) and of thrombophilia could allow a further risk stratification among the low-risk patients <60 years without history of thrombosis. The magnitude of the thrombotic risk in such patients and the final opportunity of employing such criteria for risk stratification and for tailored therapeutic measures during the follow-up must be confirmed by prospective trials.
VDS conceived and designed the study and was responsible for the statistical analysis, the final interpretation of the data, and the final drafting of the manuscript; VDS, ER, TZ were responsible for the recruitment and clinical management of the patients, and the evaluation of the thrombotic events; TZ, AC, CL were responsible for the laboratory screening for thrombophilia; PC, AF, CL were responsible for the laboratory screening for JAK2 V617F mutation and for sequencing analysis; TZ, ER, AC were responsible for the final database collecting the laboratory and clinical data; GL as senior author critically revised the paper and gave important intellectual contribution. All authors were involved in the final revision of the article, interpretation of the data and final approval of the version to be published.
The authors reported no potential conflicts of interest.
Funding: this study was supported by a grant from the Funds of the Catholic University.
Received for publication August 28, 2008. Revision received January 2, 2009. Accepted for publication January 7, 2009.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Cervantes, E. Arellano-Rodrigo, and A. Alvarez-Larran Blood cell activation in myeloproliferative neoplasms Haematologica, November 1, 2009; 94(11): 1484 - 1488. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||