Amyloidosis |
1 Department of Medicine
2 Stem Cell Transplantation Program of the Section of Hematology-Oncology and
3 Amyloid Treatment and Research Program, Department of Medicine;
4 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and
5 Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
Correspondence: Vaishali Sanchorawala, MD, Section of Hematology/Oncology, FGH 1007, 820 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02118, USA. E-mail:vaishali.sanchorawala{at}bmc.org
|
|
|---|
Key words: AL amyloidosis, stem cell transplantation, liver disease.
|
|
|---|
Untreated AL amyloidosis has an overall poor prognosis, with a median survival of 10–14 months from diagnosis.6 In patients treated with oral melphalan and prednisone, the median survival is marginally increased to 17 months6,7 with a 5-year and 10-year survival rate of 16% and 5%, respectively.8 In patients with hepatic involvement, the median survival seems to be even less, reported as nine months, with 5-year and 10-year survival rates of 13–17% and 1–7%, respectively.5
High-dose intravenous melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDM/SCT) has become a first-line treatment for selected patients with AL amyloidosis. HDM/SCT has been shown to induce both hematologic and clinical remissions in AL amyloidosis, and it appears to prolong survival substantially when hematologic remissions are achieved.9–11 Recently, we reported the long-term follow-up of 80 patients treated with HDM/SCT with a median survival of 57 months.12 In the present study, we have carried out a retrospective analysis of hepatic response after HDM/SCT treatment for patients with AL amyloidosis related liver disease.
|
|
|---|
2 using the Southwest Oncology Group criteria, left ventricular ejection fraction >40%, room air oxygen saturation >95%, lung diffusion capacity >50%, and supine systolic BP >90 mmHg, as described in our previous reports.10 Hepatic involvement was defined as liver enlargement palpated below the costal margin in the absence of heart failure or alkaline phosphatase >1.5 times institutional upper limit of normal, as described by criteria established in the Consensus Opinion from the 10th International Symposium on Amyloid and Amyloidosis.14 All patients had hepatitis B and hepatitis C serologies checked prior to undergoing HDM/SCT. Hematopoietic stem cells were mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone, and a minimum yield of at least 2.5x106 CD 34+ cells/kg was required to proceed to HDM. Patients received 100–200 mg/m2 of intravenous melphalan in two divided doses followed by stem cell transplantation 24–72 h afterwards. All patients were assessed for hematologic and organ responses within 3–6 months, at one year post-transplant, and annually thereafter. Hematologic and hepatic responses were determined as reported previously10 and by the Consensus Opinion from the 10th International Symposium on Amyloid and Amyloidosis.10,14 Hepatic response was defined as greater than 30% reduction in hepatomegaly on physical exam or a 50% decrease of an elevated alkaline phosphatase level. Treatment-related mortality was defined as death within 100 days of the SCT.
|
|
|---|
clonal plasma cell dyscrasia. Light chain sequence information was available for 33 patients. For these 33 patients, the light chain subfamily distribution was
1 (33%);
4 (3%);
1 (24%),
2 (18%);
3 (6%); and
6 (15%). By
2 analysis, this distribution of light chain subfamilies is similar to that of the entire group of AL amyloidosis patients that we have sequenced.15 No patient had serological evidence of chronic hepatitis B or C infection.
Treatment characteristics
Of 69 patients with hepatic involvement and AL amyloidosis, 42 (61%) patients received full high-dose melphalan at 200 mg/m2, while 27 (39%) received modified high-dose melphalan at 100–140 mg/m2. The median number of stem cells collected was 8.2x106 CD34+ cells/kg (range 1.2–26). The median number of stem cells infused after HDM was 5.62x106 CD34+ cells/kg (range, 1.2–13).
Assessment of treatment results
The treatment-related mortality in these patients was 13% (9/69). The most common cause for treatment-related mortality was sepsis (n=5); and other causes included cardiac arrhythmia (n=1), pulmonary embolism (n=1), respiratory failure (n=1), and spontaneous hepatic rupture (n=1). In addition, 2 more patients (3%) died of complications related to amyloidosis prior to the one year follow-up evaluation.
Using intent-to-treat analysis, the overall survival at one, two and five years was 81%, 75% and 61%, respectively, by Kaplan-Meier estimates. The median survival of these 69 patients was 90 months (7.5 years), with a mean follow-up of 47 months (Figure 1). Hematologic responses were assessed in 58 (84%) surviving patients at one year following treatment with HDM/SCT. A complete hematologic response was achieved by 53% (31/58) of patients, and of these 19 patients had received full high-dose melphalan at 200 mg/m2. In addition, 40% (23/58) achieved a partial hematologic response at one year following HDM/SCT. Hepatic responses were also assessed in the 58 (84%) patients at one year following treatment with HDM/SCT. Hepatic responses were observed in 57% (33/58) at one year and 63% (19/30) at two years.
![]() View larger version (9K): [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Figure 1. Overall survival of patients with hepatic involvement after high-dose intravenous melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation.
|
We have demonstrated improvement in AL amyloidosis associated liver disease following high-dose intravenous melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDM/SCT). A hepatic response, defined as a greater than 30% reduction in hepatomegaly on physical exam or a 50% decrease of alkaline phosphatase levels, occurred at one year in 57% of surviving patients and was sustained during subsequent follow-up in the vast majority. This outcome compares favorably to renal responses, defined as a 50% reduction in 24 h urinary protein excretion, which occurs in 36% of patients at one year and 52% of patients at two years.16 The greater rate of hepatic responses may reflect the regenerative capacity of the liver. In addition, it has been proposed that amyloidogenic light chains may have direct, reversible toxic effects on hepatic sinusoidal cells.17
Untreated systemic AL amyloidosis with hepatic involvement has a very poor prognosis, with a median survival of 8–9 months. The five-year survival rate is 13–17%.5,18 In a multi-center trial of the IBMTR registry data, hepatic involvement in AL amyloidosis showed a trend towards worse one year survival following HDM/SCT, as compared to no hepatic involvement (71% vs. 59%, p=0.07) Recently, we reported the long-term follow-up on 80 patients treated with HDM/SCT with a median survival of 57 months and a one year survival of 78%.12 The present retrospective study suggests hepatic involvement in AL amyloidosis does not predict worse outcome, with a median survival of 90 months (7.5 years) after HDM/SCT and 5-year survival of 61%. Hepatic involvement does not lead to an increase in treatment-related mortality. Treatment-related mortality in this retrospective study was 13%, which is comparable to reports from our own center and others.9,10 One patient with liver involvement died from spontaneous hepatic rupture following HDM/SCT with sepsis; this case is described in a separate report.19 There were no other deaths from hepatic failure.
Hepatic involvement also appears to not predict a poorer hematologic response. In systemic amyloidosis treated with HDM/SCT at larger, singlecenter trials, hematologic complete response was achieved in 33–51%.11 In this study, hematologic complete response was achieved in 53% of evaluable patients. It is important to note that patients with hyperbilirubinemia (serum bilirubin > 2.0 mg/dL) due to hepatic involvement should receive HDM/SCT with great caution. In this present study, no patient had serum bilirubin of >2.0 mg/dL. There was no patient who had worsening of liver function tests after HDM/SCT.
The Consensus Opinion from the 10th International Symposium on Amyloid and Amyloidosis defines hepatic response14 in part as reduction of hepatomegaly using radiographic imaging. This study had patients enrolled from 1998 to 2006, making it difficult to adapt to these criteria, published in 2005, for all patients. In our study hepatic response was assessed by physical exam as well as by reduction in alkaline phosphatase levels.
Effective treatment regimens, besides HDM/SCT, exist and should be offered to patients who are ineligible for this aggressive treatment. In a study of patients ineligible for HDM/SCT, 46 patients were treated with melphalan and high-dose dexamethasone.20 Six patients had hepatic involvement and one patient had hepatic response with normalization of alkaline phosphatase after treatment. Similarly, in patients treated with thalidomide and dexamethasone, one of 7 patients showed hepatic response, although this regimen was poorly tolerated.21 A prospective randomized clinical trial published by the French group suggested similar overall survival for patients treated with oral melphalan and dexamethasone compared to HDM/SCT.22 In this study, 3 out of 10 patients had hepatic response in the oral melphalan and dexamethasone arm compared to 5 out of 16 patients in the HDM/SCT arm.
In summary, hepatic involvement in patients with AL amyloidosis does not increase treatment-related mortality from HDM/SCT or reduce the hematologic response rate, and hepatic responses follow the hematologic responses over 1–2 years after HDM/SCT.
|
|
|---|
SG designed research, performed research, analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. DCS designed research, performed research, analyzed data and critically reviewed the manuscript. MS edited manuscript with critical review. KTF collected and analyzed data, designed research. KQ edited manuscript with critical review. GD performed statistical analysis. VS designed research, performed research, analyzed data, wrote the manuscript.
The authors reported no potential conflicts of interest.
Funding: this clinical research was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (P01 HL68705), the Gerry Foundation, and the Amyloid Research Fund at Boston University.
Received for publication October 13, 2008. Revision received February 18, 2009. Accepted for publication March 3, 2009.
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||