Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia |
1 Hematology Branch, NHLBI
2 Office of Biostatistics Research, NHLBI
3 Department of Pharmacy, Clinical Center
4 Flow Cytometry Core Facility, NHLBI
5 Metabolism Branch, CCR, NCI
6 Laboratory of Pathology, NCI, of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
Correspondence: Adrian Wiestner MD, PhD, Hematology Branch, NHLBI, NIH Bld 10, CRC 3-5140 10, Center Drive 20892-1202 Bethesda, MD, USA. Email:wiestnera{at}mail.nih.gov
|
|
|---|
Design and Methods: Patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia were treated with lenalidomide 20 mg (n=10) or 10 mg (n=8) daily for 3 weeks on a 6-week cycle. Correlative studies assessed expression of co-stimulatory molecules on tumor cells, T-cell activation, cytokine levels, and changes in lymphocyte subsets.
Results: Lenalidomide upregulated the co-stimulatory molecule CD80 on chronic lymphocytic leukemia and mantle cell lymphoma cells but not on normal peripheral blood B cells in vitro. T-cell activation was apparent in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, weak in mantle cell lymphoma, but absent in normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells and correlated with the upregulation of CD80 on B cells. Strong CD80 upregulation and T-cell activation predicted more severe side effects, manifesting in 83% of patients as a cytokine release syndrome within 8–72 h after the first dose of lenalidomide. Serum levels of various cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-
, increased during treatment. CD80 upregulation on tumor cells correlated with rapid clearance of leukemic cells from the peripheral blood. In contrast, neither the severity of the cytokine release syndrome nor the degree of T-cell activation in vitro correlated with clinical response.
Conclusions: Upregulation of CD80 on tumor cells and T-cell activation correlate with unique toxicities of lenalidomide in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. However, T-cell activation appears to be dispensable for the drugs anti-tumor effects. This provides a rationale for combinations of lenalidomide with fludarabine or alemtuzumab.
Key words: chronic lymphocytic leukemia, lenalidomide, tumor flare, CD80, cytokine release syndrome.
|
|
|---|
Multiple biological effects of lenalidomide have been described; however, the relative contributions of individual effects to this drugs anti-cancer activity remain to be defined. Despite the rapid decrease in leukemic cell count in patients at the start of treatment,1 lenalidomide has no apparent pro-apoptotic effect on CLL cells in vitro.4,8 Lenalidomide has been thought to modulate the tumor microenvironment by downregulating cytokines including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF
), interleukin (IL)-6, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). However, clinical studies in CLL have reported increased serum cytokine levels during lenalidomide treatment.1,2 A postulated inhibitory effect on bone marrow angiogenesis could not be confirmed.2
Immune activation is thought to be an important effect of lenalidomide and related immunomodulating drugs. Lenalidomide can activate T cells, NK cells, or both and in some situations can lead to an expansion of immune effector cells in vivo.9–11 Lenalidomide has been found to enhance immunological synapse formation, which could increase the anti-tumor effect of immune effector cells.12 Upregulation of co-stimulatory molecules and/or surface antigens on CLL cells, which could render the leukemic cells more immunogenic, has been described.4,8 A partially overlapping mechanism of action has been attributed to DNA oligonucleotides containing CpG motifs that are also known to increase expression of co-stimulatory molecules and to cause immune activation.13,14 However, evidence linking immune activation and clinical response to lenalidomide is missing.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Table 1. Patients characteristics at the start of lenalidomide treatment.
|
, TNF-
, IL-1
, IL-1β, IL-1R
, IL-2, IL4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, CXCL5, CXCL8/IL-8, CCL2, CCL3, and CCL4 were measured using Fluorokine MultiAnalyte Profiling (F-MAP) kits from R&D systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA) on a Luminex IS100 instrument (Luminex Corp. Austin, TX, USA) and analyzed using Masterplex software (Hitachi Software Engineering America, South San Francisco, CA, USA) (Online Supplementary Table S2).
Peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets and lymph node analysis
T, B and NK cells stained with CD4 APC, CD3 FITC, CD8 PE, CD45 PerCP, CD16, and CD56 PE and CD 19 APC using the BD FACS Sample Prep Assistant IVD (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) were quantified at the indicated times on a FACS Caliber using FACS multiSET software (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Core biopsies from superficial lymph nodes obtained prior to lenalidomide treatment and on day 8 of cycle 1 of treatment in 11 patients were stained for CD3, CD68 and CD56. The number of CD3+ cells was scored in five representative high-power fields. Images were captured at 400x fold magnification on an Olympus Bx41 microscope (Center Valley, PA, USA).
Statistics
Changes in surface antigen expression and lymphocyte subsets were examined by paired t tests. MFI measurements of surface antigens were compared using an unpaired t test, assuming unequal variances. Pearsons correlation coefficient was used to describe correlations. All tests were two-tailed and a p value of less than 0.05 was used as the criterion for statistical significance.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Figure 1. Upregulation of co-stimulatory molecules and T-cell activation. Upregulation of CD80, CD86 and CD95 on malignant B cells from patients with CLL, MCL and on normal B cells with (A) lenalidomide or (B) CpG. CD69 upregulation on T cells in the same samples: (C) lenalidomide, (D) CpG. (E) correlation between B-cell and T-cell responses to lenalidomide: CLL (open squares), MCL (gray diamond), normal donors (black triangles).
|
Clinical presentation of immune stimulation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a potentially life-threatening cytokine release syndrome
The unique side effects of lenalidomide in CLL appear to be related to immune activation. This is exemplified by patient 13, who 16 h after his first dose of 10 mg developed fatigue and back pain. On hospital admission he was febrile to 40.1°C, slightly hypotensive, without a rash or change in lymphadenopathy. Lenalidomide was withheld and intravenous hydration was started. Within hours the fever rose to 41°C and the patient developed hypotensive shock that was controlled with 8 L of intravenous fluids and methylprednisolone. There was no increase in white cell count, no evidence of tumor lysis syndrome and a work-up for infection was negative. All symptoms resolved over 3 days. This clinical presentation is reminiscent of the acute cytokine release syndrome experienced by CLL patients within hours of the first administration of rituximab16 or with the administration of oblimersen,17 a CpG antisense nucleotide. We, therefore, measured the cytokine serum levels in patient 13 during the acute presentation, finding a striking increase in inflammatory cytokines, most notably TNF
and IL6 (Figure 2A). We then measured cytokine levels in prospectively collected serum from day 8, cycle 1 in an additional 12 patients (Figure 2B). The levels of the cytokines and chemokines, IL8/CXCL8, TNF
, CCL2, CCL3, and CCL4 and the soluble receptor IL-1R
showed statistically significant increases on day 8 compared to pretreatment levels (p <0.05, Figure 2B). IFN
, IL-1
, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-17 were below the limit of detection in all samples (Online Supplementary Table S2). An increase in cytokines was already apparent on day 4 in the four patients available for analysis, suggesting that cytokine release within the first few days of treatment is a general reaction to lenalidomide. This interpretation is consistent with the rapid onset of clinical symptoms (see below).
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Figure 2. Cytokine release in CLL patients treated with lenalidomide: (A) daily after the initiation of lenalidomide in patient L13 and (B) in patients pre-treatment (squares, n=13), on day 4 (triangle, n=4) and on day 8 (diamonds, n=13) of lenalidomide treatment. (C) CRP serum levels. (D) Correlation of CRP (maximal value week 1) and cytokine release score.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Table 2. Adverse events during cycle 1 of lenalidomide therapy define a clinical cytokine release syndrome.
|
![]() View larger version (51K): [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Figure 3. Effect of lenalidomide on lymphocytes: (A) percent change compared to pre-treatment cycle 1 day 8. Patient 11: no data. (B) Mean and standard deviation of cell counts. (C) CD3 T-cell content in lymph node biopsies pre-treatment (white columns) and on day 8 of cycle 1 (black columns). (D) CD3 staining in lymph node core biopsies.
|
T-cell activation and leukemic cell clearance are distinct effects of lenalidomide
The severity of clinical side effects summarized in the cytokine release score correlated with the in vitro response to lenalidomide (Figure 4A) measured by upregulation of CD80 on CLL cells (r=0.71, p=0.001), and CD69 on T cells (r=0.75, p=0.001), and inversely with treatment-induced changes in T-cell numbers (r =–0.64; p=0.006, data not shown). There was no correlation between the clinical score and the decrease in leukemic cell count, age, RAI stage, number of prior therapies, renal impairment, or bulky disease. The average score in all patients was 2.89 (range, 0–9) with no difference between the 20 mg and the 10 mg cohort (mean scores of 2.95 and 2.81, respectively, p=0.9).
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] [Download PPT slide] |
Figure 4. Pearsons correlation between the upregulation of cell surface markers in response to lenalidomide in vitro and clinical outcome: (A) for the cytokine release score (n=17), and (B) for peripheral blood response of patients measured as reduction in B-cell count on day 21 compared to pre-treatment (n=10).
|
|
|
|---|
, IL-6, CCL2, CCL3 and CCL4. The source of these cytokines and the interactions leading to their release remain to be defined. CLL cells are an unlikely source for many of them, and in vitro studies failed to detect IL-6 or TNF
production by leukemic cells.4 The in vitro response to lenalidomide, measured by CD80 expression on CLL B cells and CD69 expression on T cells, was strongly correlated with the occurrence and severity of the cytokine release syndrome. The predictive value of these markers for severe clinical reactions will have to be validated in an independent cohort. Given the severity of side effects, it is conceivable that a test based on the in vitro response to lenalidomide could be used to stratify patients; such a strategy could reduce the need for low starting doses that is currently pursued. Our first ten patients started treatment with 20 mg daily before the dose was changed to 10 mg. This dose reduction has not had any noticeable impact on the cytokine release syndrome and two of the most severe reactions occurred in the 10 mg cohort. Because lenalidomide induces expression of co-stimulatory molecules on responsive cells over a wide concentration range,4 it is likely that doses much lower than 10 mg have to be used to avoid reactions in patients at risk.
Whether or not immune activation is required for the clinical activity of lenalidomide is controversial. In support is the observation that flare reactions may herald better clinical responses.3 However, other investigators have not made this observation.2 A recent report suggested that tumor-infiltrating immune cells may be responsible for the lymph node swelling and, by extension, for anti-tumor activity.4 In contrast, our analysis of matched lymph node biopsies obtained pre-treatment and on day 8 of cycle 1 from 11 patients, i.e. during the peak of the flare reaction, did not confirm increased T-cell infiltration. Differences between our study and that Andritsos et al. include the type of biopsies and their timing. Andritsos and colleagues compared a tonsil that had been surgically removed on day 28, a week after lenalidomide had been stopped, to a pre-treatment lymph node biopsy. Thus the observed differences in T-cell content could be related to the different tissues analyzed or to a rebound of T cells in the period off lenalidomide. Consistent with earlier reports,1 we observed a rapid reduction in ALC even in the first cycle. However, T-cell activation, the presence of a cytokine release syndrome or tumor flare reaction, and upregulation of FAS (CD95) on tumor cells did not correlate with the decrease in leukemic cells. Thus, we found no evidence to link T-cell activation or the occurrence of a cytokine release syndrome to clinical responses in CLL. Also, our finding that MCL tumor cells responded to lenalidomide in a manner similar to CLL cells but only induced minimal activation of autologous T cells in vitro is consistent with the notable absence of flare reactions in this disease. These observations, in light of a 50% response rate to lenalidomide in MCL, support the notion that anti-tumor effects may be independent of T-cell activation. The severity of the cytokine release syndrome in CLL appears to be determined by tumor characteristics, which raises the possibility of prospectively identifying patients at risk of severe reactions.
The main predictor of leukemic cell clearance, which reached an average of 62% by day 21, was lenalidomide-induced upregulation of CD80 on CLL cells in vitro (Figure 4B). Response data are currently not mature enough to test whether CD80 could serve as a predictor of overall response, and this should be addressed prospectively. It will also be interesting to test whether CD80 upregulation on tumor cells correlates with clinical responses in other B-cell malignancies. Whether CD80 expression is just a marker of unidentified biological effects of lenalidomide on CLL cell biology or whether it has a functional role in mediating leukemic cell clearance remains to be determined. In this regard it is interesting to note that CD80 is a signaling molecule that has been reported to transmit growth inhibitory and pro-apoptotic signals in B-cell lymphoma cells.18,19
While we cannot exclude that lenalidomide could have different mechanisms of action in different diseases, we favor the hypothesis that T-cell activation in CLL causes increased toxicity independently of anti-tumor effects. This provides a rationale to test the combination of lenalidomide with immunosuppressive agents such as glucocorticoids, purine analogs or alemtuzumab.
This work was presented in part at the annual American Society of Hematology meeting December 6th to 9th 2008 in San Francisco, CA, USA.
GA, NN, XT, SS, TH, JV, CB, WHW and AW were investigators of the study. GA, NN, BV, KK, FG, LS, JPM, and SP performed the laboratory work for this study. GA, NN, XT and AW participated in the statistical analysis. GA, JPM, and AW coordinated the research. GA, NN, XT, SP and AW wrote the manuscript. The authors report no potential conflicts of interest.
Funding: this work was supported by the NIH Intramural Research Program.
Received for publication January 12, 2009. Revision received March 18, 2009. Accepted for publication March 20, 2009.
|
|
|---|
. J Immunol 1999;163:380-6.Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. G. Ramsay and J. G. Gribben Immune dysfunction in chronic lymphocytic leukemia T cells and lenalidomide as an immunomodulatory drug Haematologica, September 1, 2009; 94(9): 1198 - 1202. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||