Haematologica, Vol 95, Issue 1, 169-171 doi:10.3324/haematol.2009.015545
Copyright © 2010 by Ferrata Storti Foundation
Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia |
Molecular or cytogenetic monitoring and preemptive therapy for central nervous system relapse of acute promyelocytic leukemia
Sumimasa Nagai,
Yasuhito Nannya,
Shunya Arai,
Yumiko Yoshiki,
Tsuyoshi Takahashi,
Mineo Kurokawa
Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Correspondence: Mineo Kurokawa, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyoku, Tokyo 1138655, Japan. Phone: international +81.3.5800.9092. Fax: international +81.3.5840-8667. E-mail: kurokawa-tky{at}umin.ac.jp
Key words: acute promyelocytic leukemia, central nervous system, fluorescence in situ hybridization, polymerase chain reaction, preemptive therapy.
We read with great interest the article by Montesinos et al.1 concerning central nervous system (CNS) relapse of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). They reported a low incidence of CNS involvement at first relapse in APL patients following therapy without CNS prophylaxis.1 The optimal management of APL relapse in CNS has taken on increasing significance.2 Here we report our experience concerning CNS relapse of APL and introduce a new approach with molecular or cytogenetic monitoring in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as contrasted with the observations by Montesinos et al.1
Since 2005, we experience of 6 patients with first relapse of APL at The University of Tokyo Hospital. These patients received different first-line therapies with or without prophylactic intrathecal chemotherapy (IT) and high-dose cytarabine (HDAraC), which are effective for CNS leukemia. All these first-line therapies included all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and anthracycline. Patients characteristics are shown in Table 1. The patients with relapsed APL received arsenic trioxide and prophylactic IT except case 1, who received ATRA, HDAraC, and prophylactic IT. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was performed after achieving molecular complete remission.
Early detection of CNS invasion of malignant cells by polymerase
chain reaction (PCR) or fluorescence
in situ hybridization (FISH)
has been adopted in some cases with CNS lymphoma or acute lymphoblastic
leukemia.
3–5 Although an article reported that the introduction
of routine lumbar puncture detected subclinical CNS leukemia
in some newly diagnosed APL cases,
6 monitoring by PCR or FISH
in CSF of APL patients has never been described. We evaluated
the PCR and/or FISH monitoring in cases 3–6 (
Table 1).
None of the 6 cases showed CNS involvement at the moment of
first relapse and all the cases initially had isolated hematologic
or molecular bone marrow relapse. However, 4 out of 6 cases
subsequently showed overt or subclinical CNS relapse during
salvage therapy for first relapse of APL. All the cases with
CNS relapse were with intermediate- or high-risk score,
7 which
was consistent with the observations by Montesinos
et al.
1 Case
5 showed simultaneous appearance of CNS involvement of APL and
subarachnoid hemorrhage, as we described previously.
8 He received
therapeutic IT repeatedly until all markers of CNS relapse,
including cytology, PCR, and FISH, turned negative. Surprisingly,
in the other 3 cases, we detected subclinical CNS relapse at
the moment of routine prophylactic IT. For these patients, we
provided preemptive IT or HDAraC repeatedly until the markers
of CNS relapse turned negative. Although cytological examination
detected subclinical CNS relapse in case 1, cytology remained
negative in cases 4 and 6 when PCR and/or FISH markers turned
positive. In addition, because cytology turned negative earlier
than PCR and FISH markers in case 5, these novel monitoring
methods were also useful for determining when to finish therapy
for overt CNS relapse. Therefore, PCR and/or FISH were more
sensitive than conventional cytological monitoring for detecting
CNS relapse and residual disease during the preemptive therapy.
On the other hand, it has been mentioned that the PCR approach
in CSF has some pitfalls.
3,9 It is sometimes difficult to obtain
sufficient DNA for PCR when cell counts are low, and false-positive
results may be obtained owing to contamination with blood in
the lumbar puncture procedure.
3,9 In fact, we could not obtain
sufficient DNA for PCR in some CSF samples (
Table 1). It is
noteworthy that FISH analysis was positive in spite of negative
PCR result in some samples of cases 4 and 5. This indicates
that PCR results were false-negative because of insufficient
material, suggesting superiority of FISH to PCR in monitoring
CNS relapse in CSF samples when cell counts are low. False-positive
results owing to contamination with blood were not suggested
in our PCR and FISH analyses.
Montesinos et al.1 did not mention whether their patients with isolated first bone marrow relapse experienced subsequent CNS relapse.
We consider this information to be indispensable because our observations indicated that subsequent CNS relapses during salvage therapy of relapsed APL are highly common, even if an incidence of CNS involvement at the moment of first relapse is low. We prevented and managed overt CNS relapses by adopting molecular monitoring and prophylactic or preemptive IT. Because overt CNS relapse can cause neurological symptoms and is difficult to cure, early detection is important. Therefore, we believe that these strategies should be considered for patients with relapsed APL, as contrasted with the undetermined role of CNS prophylaxis for patients with newly diagnosed APL.

References
- Montesinos P, Diaz-Mediavilla J, Deben G, Prates V, Tormo M, Rubio V, et al. Central nervous system involvement at first relapse in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with all-trans retinoic acid and anthracycline monochemotherapy without intrathecal orophylaxis. Haematologica 2009;94 9: 1242–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Nagai S, Takahashi T, Kurokawa M. Beneficial and adverse effects of molecularly targeted therapies for acute promyelocytic leukemia in central nervous system. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 2009;[Epub ahead of print].
- Gleissner B, Siehl J, Korfel A, Reinhardt R, Thiel E. CSF evaluation in primary CNS lymphoma patients by PCR of the CDR III IgH genes. Neurology 2002;58 3: 390–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- de Haas V, Vet RJ, Verhagen OJ, Kroes W, van den Berg H, van der Schoot CE. Early detection of central nervous system relapse by polymerase chain reaction in children with B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Ann Hematol 2002;81 1: 59–61.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- van Oostenbrugge RJ, Hopman AH, Arends JW, Ramaekers FC, Twijnstra A. Treatment of leptomeningeal metastases evaluated by interphase cytogenetics. J Clin Oncol 2000;18 10: 2053–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Breccia M, Carmosino I, Diverio D, De Santis S, De Propris MS, Romano A, et al. Early detection of meningeal localization in acute promyelocytic leukaemia patients with high presenting leucocyte count. Br J Haematol 2003;120 2: 266–70.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Sanz MA, Lo Coco F, Martin G, Avvisati G, Rayon C, Barbui T, et al. Definition of relapse risk and role of nonanthracycline drugs for consolidation in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia: a joint study of the PETHEMA and GIMEMA cooperative groups. Blood 2000;96 4: 1247–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Nagai S, Asai T, Watanabe T, Oshima K, Hangaishi A, Kanda Y, et al. Simultaneous appearance of central nervous system relapse and subarachnoid hemorrhage during the treatment for acute promyelocytic leukemia. Ann Hematol 2008;87 7: 593–5.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- DeAngelis LM, Cairncross JG. A better way to find tumor in the CSF? Neurology 2002;58 3: 339–40.[Free Full Text]